Go ahead, keep avoiding my question.
How did Siri create a College of Cardinals to elect a Pope while under surveillance? I'm going to follow you like a bad shadow until you give me an answer to this question.
You are just too scared to call yourselves sedevacantists. That's all that this is.
I cannot stand this dishonesty anymore, especially with Roscoe bleating every two seconds about how he isn't a sedevacantist. Yes, you actually are. Do you think conjuring up a Pope out of thin air makes you better than a sedevacantist? Do you think sedevacantists don't want a Pope? Do you think sedevacantist is a dirty word?
We are without a Pope. Whether he is in hiding or whether he doesn't exist. The Catholic of today has no Pope who can teach us or guide us. You can quibble with words all you want. Go ahead, say you're "sedeprivationist" or "sede-impedist." You know what I smell? Fear. Also: Misunderstanding of Vatican I.
It was NOT PROPHECY when they wrote about the "visible succession of Popes." CHURCH COUNCILS HAVE NOT EVER, NOR WILL THEY EVER DEAL IN PROPHECY. It said "Let those who say there SHOULD NOT be a visible succession of Popes be anathema."
In other words, let those who question the office of the Papacy itself, the democrats of the day, the advocates of collegiality, and all of the modernists who think the idea of the Vicar of Christ outmoded -- because there were many who thought this way -- be anathema.
When Siri's successor shows himself, I will acknowledge him as Pope just as you do. Until then, do you have any information about him? No? Then what exactly do you think you're accomplishing with all of this? I'm not being sarcastic, I really want to know.