Author Topic: Gregory XVII A Bad Pope? (Read 1063 times)

roscoe · « **on:** August 05, 2009, 10:48:48 PM »

It is possible that this Pope was the worst of all times-- even worse than Boniface and the two infamous Medici's but I doubt it. I consider Urban 6 and Ben 15 as anti-popes.

At any rate he was True Pope until he died in 1989 and three of us in this Forum have formally declared so. It seems as if the editor of TCW is intent on biting the hand that feeds him as he has offended 2 of them.

Those of us who cannot find any actual evidence that Fr Feeney was suppressed or censored by the Pope or Holy Office for his position of BoD( or anything else) are bemused at efforts to describe us as 'filthy', 'spiritually dead' or 'fanatics'.

If that isn't enough, why is it necessary to describe Fr Feeney as a 'pervet'? Ciao

roscoe · « **Reply #1 on:** August 05, 2009, 10:50:36 PM »

My error there as Boniface is of course an anti-pope and I am holding to that.

roscoe · « **Reply #2 on:** August 05, 2009, 11:21:54 PM »

GV-- I have found you Pope who mistakenly appointed a Freemason to high ecclsiastical position. I have been informed that Lienart was promoted by Pius XII(XI) in 1928.

There are those who attempt to create the caricature of 'Leo the liberal' and use the fraudulent allegations against Card Rampolla to do so. The SSPX in the forms of Mr Hiembichner and Yves Chiron have been at the center of smearing Card Rampolla.

There is no need what so ever to apologise for Pope Leo.

roscoe · « **Reply #3 on:** August 05, 2009, 11:24:24 PM »

I have also been informed that SSPX really goes ballistic when anyone tries to defend FR Feeney.

Dawn · « **Reply #4 on:** August 06, 2009, 07:29:08 AM »

He called Feeney a pervert? How ignorant. It was also because of Fr. Feeney making a statement that the Jesuits should not be attending class at Harvard with known atheists, enemies of the Church and sɛҳuąƖ perverts that put the nail in the Feeney coffin. Fr. Feeney was an embarrasment to the libertines running the AmerChurch in those days. It was not enough to "ban him" they have to assasinate his person even now.

Dawn · « **Reply #5 on:** August 06, 2009, 08:21:59 AM »

That he was elected Pope I have no doubt. What happened next is anybody's guess. The part that always got me was that he should have been willing to risk martyrdom ( atleast shouted to anyone who would listen) when the papacy was stolen from him and given to John 23.

Belloc · « **Reply #6 on:** August 06, 2009, 02:18:53 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

and three of us in this Forum have formally declared so.

By what authority do you have to declare anyone a Pope? Kinda Protestant-like........self scripture interpretation............

roscoe · « **Reply #7 on:** August 06, 2009, 02:39:13 PM »

There are 3 of us here who believe that Card Siri was actually elected and that it was the legitimate Curia of 1958 that declared him true Pope.

Belloc · « **Reply #8 on:** August 06, 2009, 02:52:47 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

There are 3 of us here who believe that Card Siri was actually elected and that it was the legitimate Curia of 1958 that declared him true Pope.

ok, thats fine.....

Thought initally you all meant someone else......Siri issue is interesting, but as you mean him and not others, I have not had a chance to examine all evidence, I will stop speaking on the matter..... :reading: :reporter: