Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: Croixalist

I don't know how many here actively follow Eric Gajewski, aka TradCatKnight but in the event that you do, I think it's time to drop him like a hot potato. After checking out one of his videos a ways back, I caught on to the fact that this man is entirely convinced that he is the Great Catholic Monarch.

Doesn't everybody know that InfiniteFaith is the GCM?

Has he actually made that claim?

He isn't certain of it.  But he seems to be pretty proud of his odds.  LoL


OCT 2014 - http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Why-I-thought-I-might-have-a-chance-at-being-the-GCM

Hello everyone. I decided to make this thread because a number of individuals keep bringing up an old thread of mine. The thread was about the Great Catholic Monarch, and I had posted some genealogy of mine that traces back to Charlemagne. I also speculated a bit on whether or not I could possibly be this character. Of course,to this day, people on this forum want to keep bringing it up and calling me crazy. To be honest, I think its kind of funny how they keep bringing it up and following me around with it. I decided to make this thread to sort of rub the terd in their face. In my next post I will build my case for being the GCM. For now, I am going to attach a powerpoint that shows that the Angelic Pope and the GCM are alive today. I have attached this powerpoint on this forum before, but since then I have made changes to it and added more information. Please feel free to view it, and I highly suggest reading Daniel 11 along with it.


P.S. I realize people are going to slander me for this, but I think it will be fun and I'm not worried about it.

Here's a few more quotes that are non-monarch related but range from dangerously irresponsible to merely annoying to just plain stupid.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/skZKgZnH6wU [/youtube]

First the irresponsible:

Planet X (this one comes straight from Voight)
Source: "Fear or Faith? Fright or Flight?"
47:06-47:59

This is just a reiteration of Catholic prophecy. Get off the coastlines get out of major cities, uh you know. There's some people who're just going to say Ok I'm going to stay here actually had a couple of  traditionalists priests say that. "You know we're just, this is where we are this is where we are" If that's you know the position th-that you take and you feel that's the way Our-Our Lady and Lord are leading you that's fine that's not going to take away from what I have to say to what Our Lady and Lord hold me accountable to. I have to preach it and say it from the top of the mountaintops, so to speak, from the top of the fortress. Get off the coastlines get out of the major cities. You know we're- it's- we're getting dangerously close now uh to Planet X's arrival uh which in my opinion still will be, the first time we'll see it is in December 2016 although some uh more notable scientists say it's quite possible this-this upcoming December.

I only met Voight once when he came down to say mass at my chapel one week many years back. I remember being disappointed because he started hawking some weird alternative health remedy in the Church basement after Mass.

Planet X/Nibiru might still have something to it, but unless you have some true revelation from Heaven it's pretty outrageous to start telling people they need to move. I don't think there's ever been a seer who has recommended that, only to increase devotion. Everything Gajewski says or does seems to be centered around building devotion to himself. You know, just so when everything breaks down, he'll have an Order all set to go.

Mind you, I'm not sure how he'd announce anything without all the vaunted social media at his disposal if anything should really break down but I'm sure he thinks his "eagles" will meet him in the air.

CERN, 3 Days of Darkness, and "Nephiliums"
Source: "Fear or Faith? Fright or Flight?"
1:05:25

So on that day as these evil men are now p-per um they're perfecting the Cern program where they literally through their latest technology and  please don't ask me how to explain it because I'm not a scientist again, but I-I have done an article on it to where I-I believe at a fundamental level we'll be able to understand things to where they can create wormholes now. A gateway, right, when you take a look at the uh masonic symbol you see the big "G" in there that stands for "Gateway" to the other side. So th-they're trying to bring all these demons into the world and so alls I'm saying is you know  with these Nephilium you know who knows what their going to pull out from the other side. I mean, of course we'll have to be inside on that day and thats probably the reason why when you read uh Merj-Marie Julie writings where if you're caught outside in those days y-you're gonna be so frightened of what you see and who knows? Maybe it is twenty-foot Nephiliums or whatever they're gonna be.

My first response to this is that he's got the prophecy completely wrong. the 3 Days of Darkness is about the Wrath of God, not Nephilim or "Nephilium." My second response is that this guy is a mouth-breather.

Goal Orientated!
Source: "Fear or Faith? Fright or Flight?"
2:38:41

Perhaps this is the business man in me, but I'm very goal orientated

Heroic Virtue in Using Anaogies Which He Loathes!
Source: "Fear or Faith? Fright or Flight?"
2:48:25

Uh, again I hate to use, I-I really hate to use analogies...

The Superior Ego Analogy
Source: "Fear or Faith? Fright or Flight?"
2:51:01

So, you know, we have to undertand that within the concept of the Eagle: the Eagle spreads his wings in faith and hope and he flies above the "Sea of Reason", I call it in my book. The Sea of Reason is below We can use reason to see the reflection of the sun above, right, as the eagle looks down into the water  but as Vatican I teaches although both you you know  work together, and reason is still good, but faith is superior to reason. It's superior. Th-The eagles flying far above that sea of reason. Do you follow that analogy? Uh, I of course, go into a long dissertation about it.

Dying for an analogy
Source: "Fear or Faith? Fright or Flight?"
1:55:55-1:56:21

Let me put it to you this way, another, you know, let me just... analogy. Again coming from my basketball background and I know I-I've put this in other blogs. We're not striving to just be on the team, we're- we're striving to make the team and to contribute significantly to the team. So, we're not content with just, you know, getting our skill level, so to speak, to, so where we can sit on the end of the bench although well that's still's good if you die in the state of grace for the sake of this analogy...

The Anti-Toastmaster

Just for fun or torture, try to count all the times he says "uh", "I mean", "you know", "so to speak", laughs inappropriately, breathes through his teeth and clucks his tongue!

Ecce Promo

You could also count how many times he says "TradCatKnight: The most viewed & followed traditional Catholic apostolate on the Internet", then look at the sheer amount of blog entries and social media accounts he maintains plus the occasional 3+ hour podcasts.

And now... Plagiarist!

http://www.eolutosin.com/7-principles-of-eagle/
https://orderoftheeagle.wordpress.com/7-principles/

He's so humble, the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is copying and pasting!

And now the dumbest part of his "apostolate": his awful "poetry". These are thinly veiled descriptions of himself whenever there's an eagle mentioned, or any other time really. Try, just try to make it through one of these as he reads it out!

The Egos Feed
Source: "Fear or Faith? Fright or Flight?"
2:44:42-2:46:12

The Eagles Feed

Are you not greater than the sparrow who still carnally feeds
O soldier of Christ with breastplate that reads:
Grafted into thine royalty, this profound Catholic dignity
The hour of fight strikes and excites the Eagles ready to recite their creed,
Yea, fast are the feet of those claiming to be free
Who yet hide behind self and the new world's dream
For a confirmed soldier in the divne army does not flee he rather stands firmly
He does not sway with the way and the winds of this modern world
For he is an eagle hidden in Mary, the great Tree
And uponst these majestic wings which he spreads
It is written "Faith and Hope"
with the eyes of fire rooted in charity
Yeah we takest to flight and fly above this apostasy
for it is in this one Catholic faith that Heaven still decrees
It is in our seeking of the Sacred Heart that we can only please
In which only hast the true unity, sursum corda,
And uponst his body the Eagles feed
So harken to heareth the Eagle speak
Now, who is with me?

Hopefully no one, TradCultKingth!

Is the "Order of the Eagle" supposed to be a real thing to come?

Is the "Order of the Eagle" supposed to be a real thing to come?

Eagle imagery has been associated with the GCM before. Not a whole lot, but it's there.

The son of man, the parvenu of the sea, shall be most invincible in war and shall subdue all Germany. The great house shall almost be pulled down. At last the Eagle will come from the North to the West, and shall, together with her children, be surrounded by the towers of Spain and they will raise Germany up again. The Eagle will also invade Mahometan countries and will carry the admirable sign in the Land of Promise. Peace and abundance shall return to the world.

The Great Monarch will be of French descent, large forehead, large dark eyes, light brown wavy hair, and an eagle nose. He will crush the enemies of the Pope and will conquer the East."

Then you've got the wings of a great eagle in Revelation. A possible connection to the child of Revelation?

And there were given to the woman two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the desert unto her place, where she is nourished for a time and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent.

As far as the "order" goes, it appears to have been lifted from the alleged correspondence between St. Francisco De Paola and a Simeon De Limena, Count of Montalto.

He shall he a great captain and prince of holy men, who shall be called the Holy Cross-bearers of Jesus Christ, with whom he shall destroy the Mohammedan sect and the rest of the infidels. He shall reform the Church of God by means of his followers, who shall be the best men upon earth in holiness, in arms, in science, and in every virtue, because such is the will of the Most High. They shall obtain the dominion of the whole world, both temporal and spiritual, and they shall support the Church of God until the end of time.

I say "alleged" for two reasons. First, I can't find any evidence supporting the actual existence of these letters, nor for that matter any "Simeon De Limena" in history outside of this prophecy. Secondly, it contains a prediction that clearly did not come true as St. Francisco died in 1507.

Four hundred years shall not pass when his Divine Majesty shall visit the world with a new religious order much needed, which shall effect more good among men than all other religious institutions combined.

So we have to admit the possibility of a hoax or forgery. If it is fake, I wouldn't be surprised if it was to help the cause of the very real Henry of Artois, who's claim died with him in 1883, well within the projected timeline of the prophecy. Even if we take it at face value, it doesn't say anything about an order of "eagles". Can anyone find a hawkmen prophecy out there?

I'm not a follower of Eric's posts per se, and I don't listen to his podcast, but he is on my Facebook "friends" list. I have noticed on my Fb "news feed" that his posts about Vladimir Putin are generally positive. Eric does seem to have a decent following. Now, this demands the following question: Due to your disdain for Putin & Russia, is your "calling out" Eric actually geared to get his followers to tune out Eric, thereby, effectively stop reading positive posts about Putin? The Catholic community does seem to have gone through a paradigm shift, at least to some degree, regarding Putin, which, generally, has turned supportive. I'm not crediting Eric for this shift by any means, but due to him having a decent following, surely some of his posts will help reinforce this positive perception of Putin. So, what's your real motivation in calling out Eric here on CathInfo? Just askin'...

I will admit that his apparent claim to being the Great Catholic Monarch is ridiculous and, perhaps, a bit disturbing, as well as his alignment with potentially schismatic clerics who go out of their way to divert the faithful from receiving the Sacraments from good, holy priests such as Fr. Zendejas.

Yes, Gajewski has been generally positive about Putin, which I disagree with him over. I also agree with his stance against Feeneyism and against the Dimond bros, but all that is secondary (at least to me). I have disagreed with various members here on various topics, you all know who you are! But on good faith and charity, I'm alerting people about a man who appears to be preying upon those very new to tradition and might not be aware that his underlying goal is to be "the one who gives the commands." As a layman, that ought to be pretty disturbing coming from the mouth of just about anyone.

It has something to do with what Bishop Williamson called a crisis of authority. As a layman I have only my sensus Catholicus to lead me on in the absence of priests, bishops, or a Pope who seem to have abandoned theirs. I realize that I'm not in a position to settle any issues, I can only recommend alternatives. I reserve the right to do the same in respect to my peers.

If we get into an ad hoc/ad hominem argument it won't end unless an actual authority, in this case Matthew, comes around to shut it down and or hand out bans. Otherwise, it would be quite chaotic. Same thing with the broader questions and I value my peace of mind and soul too much to get entangled too deeply anymore.  It takes me awhile to settle down after a round of vigorous disagreement so I'd rather not start up a new one. Hopefully most of us can agree that this kind of personality is toxic and should not be encouraged as long as he's under the wrong impression.

Now, I was hoping to keep this focused on Eric but if you absolutely insist on turning it into yet another Putin thread, then I suppose we could. Afterall, there are a few claiming that Putin might be the GCM too!

Quote from: ascent

I'm not a follower of Eric's posts per se, and I don't listen to his podcast, but he is on my Facebook "friends" list. I have noticed on my Fb "news feed" that his posts about Vladimir Putin are generally positive. Eric does seem to have a decent following. Now, this demands the following question: Due to your disdain for Putin & Russia, is your "calling out" Eric actually geared to get his followers to tune out Eric, thereby, effectively stop reading positive posts about Putin? The Catholic community does seem to have gone through a paradigm shift, at least to some degree, regarding Putin, which, generally, has turned supportive. I'm not crediting Eric for this shift by any means, but due to him having a decent following, surely some of his posts will help reinforce this positive perception of Putin.

Well, I'm not a fan of Eric, but I am neutral-to-favorable on Putin. So now what?

Russia's pretty much the only possible superpower a possible Catholic state could hope to make an alliance with.  USA's automatically going to be an enemy, no question, and you'd have to have some major economic pull for China to even consider it, and that's disregarding their general hatred of religion.

If one emerges, they'll have to make an alliance with a superpower to keep the US from military action.

Quote from: MrYeZe

Russia's pretty much the only possible superpower a possible Catholic state could hope to make an alliance with.  USA's automatically going to be an enemy, no question, and you'd have to have some major economic pull for China to even consider it, and that's disregarding their general hatred of religion.

If one emerges, they'll have to make an alliance with a superpower to keep the US from military action.

All roads lead back to Fatima before Rome in this case. Trust no one until the Consecration is accomplished. The errors of Russia go all the way back to when Catholicism, namely the authority of the Pope, was rejected. A Catholic restoration under the Russian Orthodox is as paradoxical as a restoration under the Novus Ordo. It won't happen because it can't happen. For the Consecration!

Yeah, but of all the superpowers, Russia's the least likely to invade for stupid reasons like "Instillin' democracy and freedum."

Quote from: MrYeZe

Quote from: Croixalist

Quote from: MrYeZe

Russia's pretty much the only possible superpower a possible Catholic state could hope to make an alliance with.  USA's automatically going to be an enemy, no question, and you'd have to have some major economic pull for China to even consider it, and that's disregarding their general hatred of religion.

If one emerges, they'll have to make an alliance with a superpower to keep the US from military action.

All roads lead back to Fatima before Rome in this case. Trust no one until the Consecration is accomplished. The errors of Russia go all the way back to when Catholicism, namely the authority of the Pope, was rejected. A Catholic restoration under the Russian Orthodox is as paradoxical as a restoration under the Novus Ordo. It won't happen because it can't happen. For the Consecration!

Yeah, but of all the superpowers, Russia's the least likely to invade for stupid reasons like "Instillin' democracy and freedum."

No nation has a chance without adopting Catholicism 100%, the US included. No natural turn of events will do the trick, all political entities must undergo conversion. I'm not just singling out Russia in that sense. Our Lady knows best, and Russia was among the first nations to split off from the Church. They're due. Here's hoping!

I'm not saying that they will. I'm just saying that if a Catholic State emerges in, say, Poland, that allying with Russia would be its best chance to protect its newly formed Catholic regime from incursions by the U.S., possibly Europe, though I doubt any European country but the UK could invade successfully without help from the U.S.

Quote from: ascent

I'm not a follower of Eric's posts per se, and I don't listen to his podcast, but he is on my Facebook "friends" list. I have noticed on my Fb "news feed" that his posts about Vladimir Putin are generally positive. Eric does seem to have a decent following. Now, this demands the following question: Due to your disdain for Putin & Russia, is your "calling out" Eric actually geared to get his followers to tune out Eric, thereby, effectively stop reading positive posts about Putin? The Catholic community does seem to have gone through a paradigm shift, at least to some degree, regarding Putin, which, generally, has turned supportive. I'm not crediting Eric for this shift by any means, but due to him having a decent following, surely some of his posts will help reinforce this positive perception of Putin. So, what's your real motivation in calling out Eric here on CathInfo? Just askin'...

I will admit that his apparent claim to being the Great Catholic Monarch is ridiculous and, perhaps, a bit disturbing, as well as his alignment with potentially schismatic clerics who go out of their way to divert the faithful from receiving the Sacraments from good, holy priests such as Fr. Zendejas.

Yes, Gajewski has been generally positive about Putin, which I disagree with him over. I also agree with his stance against Feeneyism and against the Dimond bros, but all that is secondary (at least to me). I have disagreed with various members here on various topics, you all know who you are! But on good faith and charity, I'm alerting people about a man who appears to be preying upon those very new to tradition and might not be aware that his underlying goal is to be "the one who gives the commands." As a layman, that ought to be pretty disturbing coming from the mouth of just about anyone.

It has something to do with what Bishop Williamson called a crisis of authority. As a layman I have only my sensus Catholicus to lead me on in the absence of priests, bishops, or a Pope who seem to have abandoned theirs. I realize that I'm not in a position to settle any issues, I can only recommend alternatives. I reserve the right to do the same in respect to my peers.  

Fair enough.  :cheers: