Nope. I'll disagree. He cited +Lefebvre only as a weapon against SVs (how all the Salza/Siscoe accounts started out), but if you read carefully what he was saying, he was implicitly condeming all Traditional Catholics as heretics/schismatics. I called out the last few registered accounts for this, and so he was trying to be a bit more subtle by pretending he was promoting +Lefebvre when in point of fact he was not.
Correct. Although 2Vermont is right that he is supportive of the
neo-SSPX/Bishop Fellay direction with his un-Catholic, legalistic mentality that we all have to hold hands with the neo-modernists and be part of their Conciliar Church in order to be Catholic. I was almost going to ask him if he and Bishop Fellay and his other friend go to the same Lodge...