Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Crisis in the Church => Topic started by: TomGubbinsKimmage on November 07, 2025, 06:57:52 AM
-
(https://i.imgur.com/qiNHJ5A.jpeg)
Now, before you resistance and SSPX types get all judgy judgy about poor Saint Pierre Thuc and the fruits of his work, I think we should safely presume that these children involved in these ordinations, were of such Joan of Arc level sanctity, that it was deemed only right and proper that they be involved in the Rites!
Problem solved!!!!
Here I was about to be all harsh on sedevacantism and Thuc for a second.....
Shame on me!
-
Now, before you resistance and SSPX types get all judgy judgy about poor Saint Pierre Thuc and the fruits of his work, I think we should safely presume that these children involved in these ordinations, were of such Joan of Arc level sanctity, that it was deemed only right and proper that they be involved in the Rites!
Problem solved!!!!
Here I was about to be all harsh on sedevacantism and Thuc for a second.....
Shame on me!
Could you explain the connection between the picture you posted and the late Archbishop Pierre Thuc? I am quietly following your threads in order to better understand the origins and workings of sedevacantism.
-
Could you explain the connection between the picture you posted and the late Archbishop Pierre Thuc? I am quietly following your threads in order to better understand the origins and workings of sedevacantism.
I would advise that TomGK would not be one to "follow" in order to better understand the origins and workings of sedevecantism.
-
Could you explain the connection between the picture you posted and the late Archbishop Pierre Thuc? I am quietly following your threads in order to better understand the origins and workings of sedevacantism.
Please read this
https://www.latinmassmaritimes.org/the-ringrose-affair-3
Father Ringrose has been a solid priest in the traditional movement for 40+ years.
-
(https://i.imgur.com/qiNHJ5A.jpeg)
Now, before you resistance and SSPX types get all judgy judgy about poor Saint Pierre Thuc and the fruits of his work, I think we should safely presume that these children involved in these ordinations, were of such Joan of Arc level sanctity, that it was deemed only right and proper that they be involved in the Rites!
Problem solved!!!!
Here I was about to be all harsh on sedevacantism and Thuc for a second.....
Shame on me!
Church emphasizes the right to voice opinions on matters concerning the good of the Church, but stresses that this must be done with due reverence and a focus on charity.
Publicly disrespecting a bishop can be considered a sin of scandal if it leads others to disrespect authority or lose their faith.
Publicly revealing a bishop's faults (even if true) to cause harm to their reputation is a sin of detraction.
Publicly inciting disobedience or hatred against a bishop is a canonical offense and is punishable by law.
If the disrespect is a public attack with malicious intent, it could be considered a mortal sin.
You might want to stop.
-
Could you explain the connection between the picture you posted and the late Archbishop Pierre Thuc? I am quietly following your threads in order to better understand the origins and workings of sedevacantism.
It's just another Bishop of the Thuc line.
It is said that there are over 400 of them.
So there is endless comedy material to be posting up.
This has been a long time coming. The sedes have been appearing serious in the last ten years or so to people. When in reality they are a joke.
The mad stuff they get up to is to be considered bad fruit. Compared to the sane line of Lefebvre and Williamson.
-
Please read this
https://www.latinmassmaritimes.org/the-ringrose-affair-3
Father Ringrose has been a solid priest in the traditional movement for 40+ years.
I have consistently referred to them as DOGMATIC sedes. Did you somehow miss me say this. Really when I say sede I mean the dogmatic ones.
Father Ringrose is a NON dogmatic sede. We have ALWAYS tolerated those.
However people like sean johnson and some of our clergy have acted like it was the greatest evil in the world to be a sede. When it is just a theological opinion. A foolish one, but stil a theological opinion.
My attacks are directed at the DOGMATIC sedes, especially those who follow the Thuc line. Because it is through this line we see the full consequences of the foolishness of Dogmatic sedevacantism.
I hope this clears things up!
-
Church emphasizes the right to voice opinions on matters concerning the good of the Church, but stresses that this must be done with due reverence and a focus on charity.
Publicly disrespecting a bishop can be considered a sin of scandal if it leads others to disrespect authority or lose their faith.
Publicly revealing a bishop's faults (even if true) to cause harm to their reputation is a sin of detraction.
Publicly inciting disobedience or hatred against a bishop is a canonical offense and is punishable by law.
If the disrespect is a public attack with malicious intent, it could be considered a mortal sin.
You might want to stop.
I hope people are scandalized. Because it is a Pharisaical scandal, and a necessary step to true humility and not being a fool.
We have seen some of the foolishness exhibited with Ladislaus treating him like a Saint. And others not even able to read two threads back to find basic information.
-
the sane line of Lefebvre and Williamson.
Before +Williamson consecrated Ballini, Stobnicki, and Morgan, he told me, himself, that he was losing his mind. Did it happen to +Thuc, also? Doesn't matter.
Unless the Church declares a bishop unfit, his consecrations and ordinations are valid. Go read Canon law.