Palau’s vision includes an explicit command: “Be silent, it is a secret and a mystery; write no more on this matter.” This injunction applies to identifying the individual who may serve as the Antichrist’s visible head. It does not forbid diagnosing or warning about a corrupting system that infiltrates institutions. Highlight: analyze structures and prepare; do not publicly name a contemporary person as the Antichrist.

What Palau describes (summary)
Palau portrays a twofold reality: (1) a systemic infiltration — a seductive, political‑religious order that “seduced the whole world” and exerts social and institutional domination; and (2) a personal culmination — a “son of perdition” who will function as the system’s visible head. The text emphasizes both the structural nature of the danger and the prudential secrecy surrounding the person.

Concrete indicators to watch for now

• Doctrinal ambiguity: repeated official or widespread statements that blur core doctrines (e.g., on sacraments, authority, or the nature of the Church).
• Institutional politicization: ecclesial structures increasingly subordinated to secular political agendas or managerial frameworks.
• Substitution of ends: humanitarian or social goals presented as replacements for sacramental and evangelical priorities.
• Centralized coercion: pressure on clergy or faithful to conform to policies that contradict received doctrine or conscience.
• Public veneration of secular unity: rhetoric that prizes a human‑centered “universal brotherhood” in ways that marginalize supernatural faith.

From St. Athanasius' "History of the Arians"

77. Constantius the precursor of Antichrist

Terrible indeed, and worse than terrible are such proceedings; yet conduct suitable to him who assumes the character of Antichrist. Who that beheld him taking the lead of his pretended Bishops, and presiding in Ecclesiastical causes, would not justly exclaim that this was 'the abomination of desolation Daniel 9:27 ' spoken of by Daniel? For having put on the profession of Christianity, and entering into the holy places, and standing therein, he lays waste the Churches, transgressing their Canons, and enforcing the observance of his own decrees. Will any one now venture to say that this is a peaceful time with Christians, and not a time of persecution? A persecution indeed, such as never arose before, and such as no one perhaps will again stir up, except 'the son of lawlessness 2 Thessalonians 2:8,' do these enemies of Christ exhibit, who already present a picture of him in their own persons. Wherefore it especially behooves us to be sober, lest this heresy which has reached such a height of impudence, and has diffused itself abroad like the 'poison of an adder Proverbs 23:32,' as it is written in the Proverbs, and which teaches doctrines contrary to the Saviour; lest, I say, this be that 'falling away 2 Thessalonians 2:3,' after which He shall be revealed, of whom Constantius is surely the forerunner. Else why is he so mad against the godly? Why does he contend for it as his own heresy, and call every one his enemy who will not comply with the madness of Arius, and admit gladly the allegations of the enemies of Christ, and dishonour so many venerable Councils? Why did he command that the Churches should be given up to the Arians? Was it not that, when that other comes, he may thus find a way to enter into them, and may take to himself him who has prepared those places for him? For the ancient Bishops who were ordained by Alexander, and by his predecessor Achillas, and by Peter before him, have been cast out; and those introduced whom the companions of soldiers nominated; and they nominated only such as promised to adopt their doctrines.

******************************************
Athanasius, History of the Arians §77 — plain sense

Athanasius clearly teaches that a future lawless figure will enter into and take possession of a church already prepared by heretical, imperial‑backed usurpers. He describes a two‑stage process: (1) orthodox bishops are expelled and compliant nominees installed; (2) those prepared structures are left open so that “when that other comes, he may thus find a way to enter into them, and may take to himself him who has prepared those places for him.” The effect Athanasius intends is that the lawless one will assume authority within the counterfeit ecclesial body rather than merely being an external antagonist.







St. Athanasius furnishes a historical instance that functions as a prophetic type: under imperial patronage, Arian partisans were installed into episcopal offices, outwardly professing Christianity while subverting doctrine, and using canonical authority to impose their decrees. Athanasius himself reads these events in the language of Daniel and 2 Thessalonians, treating Constantius as a forerunner of the lawless one. That combination of;

(1) institutional takeover,
(2) outward orthodoxy with inward heresy, and
(3) canonical/legal manipulation

is precisely the mechanism Palau identifies as the way a false church will be prepared and handed over to the Antichrist. Athanasius therefore supplies both a concrete precedent and an explicit theological reading that reinforce Palau’s prophetic pattern.

Where Palau treats the mechanism (pre‑Vatican II primary texts)

• Collected Writings of Francisco Palau (19th century material, ed. Eulogio Pacho / Monte Carmelo editions). These volumes gather his prophetic reflections and pastoral essays in which he repeatedly warns of an anti‑Christian revolution that will work through ecclesiastical structures.
• “My Relations with the Church” (Spanish: Mis relaciones con la Iglesia / sometimes translated as My Relations with the Church). In the later chapters Palau diagnoses a crisis of authority and describes how false pastors and corrupted governance will prepare the Church for a period of great apostasy.
• “The Church of God as Pictured in Holy Scripture” (title appears in Palau’s cycle on the Church). Here Palau contrasts the true mystical Church with a counterfeit body that will appear Christian while being emptied of grace and truth; he treats the takeover as institutional and juridical, not merely doctrinal.

How Palau’s language maps to the canonical/legal‑manipulation mechanism

• Purge and replacement of pastors: Palau speaks of a cleansing in reverse — orthodox pastors driven out and replaced by those who will conform to the prevailing anti‑Christian order.
• Use of office and law: He emphasizes that the enemy will use ecclesiastical office, canonical forms, and juridical procedures to give error the appearance of legitimacy.
• Outward orthodoxy, inward corruption: Palau repeatedly warns that the counterfeit will keep Christian rites and language while subverting doctrine from within.
• Eschatological function: For Palau the institutional takeover is not merely historical abuse but the very preparation that makes a “body of the Antichrist” possible; he pairs this with hope in a future Restorer (an Elijah‑like figure) who will renew the Church.
• ***************************

St. Athanasius' again:

80. Duty of separating from heretics

One might say much more against this detestable and antichristian heresy, and might demonstrate by many arguments that the practices of Constantius are a prelude to the coming of Antichrist. But seeing that, as the Prophet Isaiah 1:6 has said, from the feet even to the head there is no reasonableness in it, but it is full of all filthiness and all impiety, so that the very name of it ought to be avoided as a dog's vomit or the poison of serpents; and seeing that Costyllius openly exhibits the image of the adversary 2 Thessalonians 2:4; in order that our words may not be too many, it will be well to content ourselves with the divine Scripture, and that we all obey the precept which it has given us both in regard to other heresies, and especially respecting this. That precept is as follows; 'Depart, depart, go out from thence, touch no unclean thing; go out of the midst of them, and be separate, that bear the vessels of the Lord Isaiah 52:11.' This may suffice to instruct us all, so that if any one has been deceived by them, he may go out from them, as out of Sodom, and not return again unto them, lest he suffer the fate of Lot's wife; and if any one has continued from the beginning pure from this impious heresy, he may glory in Christ and say, 'We have not stretched out our hands to a strange god ; neither have we worshipped the works of our own hands, nor served the creature more than You, the God that hast created all things through Your word, the Only-Begotten Son our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom to You the Father together with the same Word in the Holy Spirit be glory and power for ever and ever. Amen.'

*******************************
"neither have we worshipped the works of our own hands."

Novus Ordo "Preparation of Gifts":

"Blessed are you, Lord God of all creation, for through your goodness we have received the bread we offer you: fruit of the earth and work of human hands, it will become for us the bread of life."

https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/28158.htm