Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from  (Read 2680 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lover of Truth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8700
  • Reputation: +1158/-863
  • Gender: Male
http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/francis-chaos-interview.htm

He did it again...

Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from Africa
francis-head.jpg

When you see this microphone in front of this face, you know it’s time to run for the hills...


Boy, this is really getting old. You know how it works: Francis departs from his umpteenth trip by plane, and during the flight he pulls out a microphone and takes questions from members of the press. The Bergoglian jaw starts moving, and at that point, the sky’s the limit as to what words will leave his mouth.

In the latest case, that of November 30, 2015, nothing short of chaos ensued, as usual. We give you the highlights — or rather, lowlights — below, although we will refrain from any substantial commentary. After two-and-a-half years of this man pretending to be Pope, there really shouldn’t be a need for a whole lot of additional remarks at this point. It’s all been said. Bergoglio is simply recycling the same errors and heresies and offering them in different wrapping paper here and there.

What follows is an excerpt of an English translation of the transcript of the in-flight press conference given by the “Pope” on November 30, provided by Rome Reports. The transcript is posted at the Vatican web site in the original Italian.

“Idolatry is when a man or a woman loses his or her ID card, in other words their identity as God’s children and prefers to seek a tailor-made God.”

“Today I went to the mosque, I prayed there, the Imam got into the Popemobile to go for a short ride among the refugees. There is one small group that is very violent, I believe they are Christians or they claim to be Christians but it’s not ISIS, it’s something else.”

[on the press:] “We need professionalism.”

[on the role of religious leaders in political matters:] “They should be priests, pastors, Imams, Rabbis. Their political intervention is indirect, they preach values, real values and one of the greatest values of all is fraternity between us. We are all God’s children, we all have the same Father. I don’t like the word tolerance, we need to live peacefully alongside one another, develop friendships. Fundamentalism is a disease that exists in all religions. In the Catholic Church we have some – many – who believe they possess the absolute truth and they go on sullying others through slander and defamation and this is wrong. I say this because it is my Church. Religious fundamentalism must be combatted. It is not religious, God is lacking, it is idolatric.”

[on the AIDS/HIV epidemic in Africa and possibly allowing the use of condoms to help ease it:] “The question seems biased to me. Yes, it is one of the methods, the morality of the Church faces a bit of a predicament here. The fifth or the sixth commandment: defend life or a sɛҳuąƖ relationship that is open to life. But this is not the problem. There is a greater problem than this: this question makes me think of the question they once asked Jesus: tell me Master, is it acceptable to heal on a Saturday? Healing is obligatory! Malnutrition, exploitation, slave labour, the lack of drinking water, these are the problems. We’re not talking about which plaster we should use for which wound. The great injustice is social injustice, the great injustice is malnutrition. I don’t like making such casuistic reflections when there are people dying because of a lack of water and hunger. Think about arms trafficking. When these problems cease to exist, then I think we can ask ourselves the question: is it acceptable to heal on a Saturday? Why are arms still being manufactured? Wars are the leading cause of death. Forget about whether it is acceptable or not to heal on a Saturday. Make justice and when everyone is healed, when there is no injustice in this world, then we can talk about Saturday.”

[on the crisis between Russia and Turkey:] “I don’t know what the Vatican thinks. What do I think? I think wars are sinful, they destroy humanity, they are a cause of exploitation and human trafficking. They need to stop. Twice, both in New York and Kenya, I said to the United Nations: your work should not be that of a declamatory nominalism. Here in Africa, I saw how the Blue Helmets work but it is not enough. Wars are not a thing of God, God is the God of peace, he created a beautiful world. In the Bible, we read about a brother killing a brother: the first world war. And it pains me deeply to say this.”

[on the climate change conference taking place in Paris, whether we can expect progress to be made:] “I am not certain but what I can say is that it is either now or never. I think the first conference took place in Tokyo…little was achieved. Every year the problems get worse. At a university meeting on what kind of a world we want to leave behind for our children, one person said: are you sure there will be any children of this generation still around? We are on the verge of ѕυιcιdє, to use a strong word and I am certain that people in Paris are aware of this and want to do something about it.”

[on the contribution of Islam and Mohammed to the world:] “Dialogue is possible, they have many values and these values are constructive. I am also friends with a Muslim, a world leader. We are able to talk. He has his values, I have mine, he prays and so do I. Many values; prayer, fasting. You cannot wipe out a religion just because there are some or a number of groups of fundamentalists at one moment in history. It is true, there have always been wars between faiths and we too need to ask for forgiveness: Catherine de’ Medici was no saint and that war that lasted 30 years, St. Bartholomew's Day massacre… We also need to ask for forgiveness. But they have values and dialogue is possible. Today I went to the mosque, the Imam wanted to come with me. A Pope and an Imam both got into the Popemobile. Think of all the wars we Christians have waged. It wasn’t the Muslims who were responsible for the Sack of Rome.”

(Excerpts taken from: “Full text of the Pope's press conference aboard the papal plane”, Rome Reports, Nov. 30, 2015)


It says a lot that while Bergoglio’s words quoted above would have been unthinkable to be taken as “papal” even just three years ago, at this point so much has happened that many will probably think this is no big deal. That’s how desensitized we have become to this bunk. Francis is turning the papacy (what the world views as the papacy) into a complete laughing stock, so that by the time he is done, the Pope (again, in the eyes of the world) will be nothing but a “regular guy”, even worse, a doddering fool running off his mouth, who cannot be taken seriously by any thinking human being. We have said before that it is time to publicly disassociate oneself from Francis, else we be cause for scandal.

Again Francis has spoken on his pet topics, such as the “idolatry” of money, and has once more blasted those evil “Catholic fundamentalists”. If you have not done so yet, we encourage you to listen to TRADCAST 009 (the latest episode of our free podcast program), in which we take apart Francis’ obsessive denunciations of figurative “idolatries” while at the same time encouraging and accepting real idolatry, the idolatry of literally adoring the creature, as is done by pagans. As far as those Catholic fundamentalists, where are they? Who are they? Bergoglio is constantly denouncing the very people that barely even exist in his 1.1-billion-member religion. You know, those evil people who “proselytize” in his church, for example — the way he talks, you’d think his religion is full of people trying to make others into Catholics, whether by genuine means (the true meaning of “proselytism”) or by dishonest and dishonorable means (the special Novus Ordo meaning of “prosleytism”). Where are those people? Yes, there are some, no doubt, but their percentage is as tiny as their influence.

While Muslim terrorism has engulfed the world in the most horrific murders crying to Heaven for vengeance — committed by people who simply follow their oh-so-peaceful Koran, a book Benedict XVI once said he has respect for (see footnote 3 here)— when asked about it, what does Francis do? He goes off on alleged crimes of Catholics from centuries ago. The Muslim religion has a history of bƖσσdshɛd from the very beginning, yet no denunciation apart from attacking Catholics in ages past.

Some of Francis’ other statements, such as the ones about the world’s alleged committing of ѕυιcιdє from carbon emissions etc., and his shameful castigation of Catholic morality as essentially pedantic in the face of physical evils such as starvation and malnutrition, are so undignified, laughable, and idiotic as not to deserve comment.

What’s one more act of apostasy? Francis prays inside Islamic Mosque on Nov. 30, 2015, as he finishes his trip to Africa


What will happen next? It will probably be business as usual: Those in the Novus Ordo Sect who aren’t completely brain-dead yet are going to denounce this latest interview for the farce that it is (although we know they still won’t conclude that the man himself is a farce, i.e. not the Pope), while the typical Novus Ordo news organs will simply report everything matter-of-factly. Michael Voris and his Church Disneyland enterprise will pretend nothing happened; Chris Ferrara will blow another fuse on the next Remnant Forum show while drawing absolutely no legitimate conclusions from this; Michael Matt will whine and wring his hands about it while promoting the new Salza-Siscoe book that argues that the bumbling Argentinian apostate is in fact the Vicar of Christ to whom, nevertheless, somehow no one is allowed to submit, and this under pain of eternal damnation. Mark Shea will post a dumb meme on his cash-cow blog and leave a sarcastic comment directed at those of his readers who dare to be critical of Francis, while “Father” Zuhlsdorf will be distracting you with important photos of his latest extravagant dinner. As Mundabor struggles to find new superlative expletives to hurl at the head of his religion, Jimmy Akin is probably already busy trying to come up with 12 Things to Know and Share to “explain” to his lemmings why there is really nothing in this interview that should trouble you. Finally, Louie Verrecchio will welcome the opportunity to lay into Francis to raise more funds for his new-found mission to be yet another resistance blogger and speaker to tell the world exactly what umpteen other writers and speakers in his camp are already saying — with absolutely no hope of ever changing the situation.

Welcome to “Catholicism” in 2015. You can’t make this stuff up.
"I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church


Offline Meg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6173
  • Reputation: +3147/-2941
  • Gender: Female
Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2015, 09:27:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth


    .....yet another resistance blogger and speaker to tell the world exactly what umpteen other writers and speakers in his camp are already saying — with absolutely no hope of ever changing the situation.

    Welcome to “Catholicism” in 2015. You can’t make this stuff up.


    Lover of Truth, what do you yourself propose as a sure method of changing the situation?
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #2 on: December 01, 2015, 11:02:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    [on the AIDS/HIV epidemic in Africa and possibly allowing the use of condoms to help ease it:] The question seems biased to me. Yes, it is one of the methods, the morality of the Church faces a bit of a predicament here. The fifth or the sixth commandment: defend life or a sɛҳuąƖ relationship that is open to life. But this is not the problem. There is a greater problem than this: this question makes me think of the question they once asked Jesus: tell me Master, is it acceptable to heal on a Saturday?

    What is a Protestant to think of this?  Or, is Francis speaking with consideration of what Protestants might think when they hear him talking like this?

    To a Protestant, the fifth Commandment is "Honor thy father and thy mother."  And the sixth Commandment is "Thou shalt not kill."  So is he saying to Protestants something about a "sɛҳuąƖ relationship that is open to life" in regards to honoring one's parents?  

    Also, what they asked Our Lord was whether it was acceptable to heal on the Sabbath, not "on a Saturday."  What he's saying here makes more sense to Jєωs and 7th Day Adventists than it does to Christians.

    Just for kicks, I tried "heal on the Sabbath" and "heal on a Saturday" in a search engine.  The former got all manner of hits for Mark 3, Luke 13 and Matthew 12.  But the latter was all full of community projects and calendar events like "Heal the Bay" and "Willowbrook survivor" with no mention of the Bible passages or of Jesus.

    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1158/-863
    • Gender: Male
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #3 on: December 01, 2015, 12:33:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Meg
    Quote from: Lover of Truth


    .....yet another resistance blogger and speaker to tell the world exactly what umpteen other writers and speakers in his camp are already saying — with absolutely no hope of ever changing the situation.

    Welcome to “Catholicism” in 2015. You can’t make this stuff up.


    Lover of Truth, what do you yourself propose as a sure method of changing the situation?


    This is the type of question that a thoughtful individual would ask!  Very excellent question!!!

    Since we cannot predict outcomes we can only suggest what appears to be a good step without claiming it to be sure.  

    First, people must preach from the housetops that these charlatans are not legitimate Catholic authorities.  Once the Novus Ordo Sect is no longer taken seriously in its claim to being the Catholic Church, it will fall apart.  Imagine how powerful we would be if all resistance adherents became public Sedevacantists. The new church would be embarrassed to the bone. Plus, we reproduce. We must have a situation where people publicly laugh at the idea that Mr Cupich is the archbishop of Chicago, for example.  And we must convert the Swiss Guards.  :wink: Conversion of the Vatican would be great, but for the safety of souls, they must first be expelled.  All they have accomplished, apart from leading billions to Hell, is to totally mess up Catholic ecclesiology, where heretics are part of the Church etc.  To say Cupich is a heretic but insist he's still a Catholic archbishop doesn't accomplish anything.  Those of good will (the laity, invalid and valid priests, and bishops) need a sure guide whom they can be sure will give them bread instead of stones or the Eucharist instead of bread.

    The sure method is TRUTH.  But this depends on the will of the people being good.  What sure method is there of making bad willed people good willed people?  Perhaps you have an answer.  But we must instruct the ignorant.  Which may mean instructing them on the fact that if they are culpably ignorant they face a fearful Judgement.  It means those of good will with the time and ability to study legitimate sources on ecclesiology do so without letting the fear of the fact that the conciliar Church is about as Catholic as their leader is Pope.  They must allow themselves to come to the accurate conclusion and publicly articulate it.  If all the clergy of good will, assuming the vast majority of traditional leaning clerics are of good will, preached the vital truth that we must have nothing to do with heretics lest we follow them into the pit, the people would follow and we would be at least heading towards a more visible to the natural eye Catholic Church again.  That is a Catholic Church which is Catholic. :smile: The One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church would be closer to being on every street corner than scattered abroad as it is now.  Once we get to this point you will then be able to contact one of the now many sound clergy instead of me or Novus Ordo Watch as to what the next sure [good] step should be.  But let's do what we can to get to that point first.
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1158/-863
    • Gender: Male
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #4 on: December 01, 2015, 12:50:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • To be clear, having nothing to do with heretics means not belonging to the Church in which they are in charge.  
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church


    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5768
    • Reputation: +4621/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #5 on: December 01, 2015, 01:13:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jorge Bergoglio
    Today I went to the mosque, I prayed there.


    Interestingly, this is precisely the example that Saint Thomas gives as evidence of apostasy.  But we all already knew he is an apostate, though some of us are in denial and most of us say that it doesn't matter that the pope's an apostate.

    Offline MMagdala

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 876
    • Reputation: +342/-78
    • Gender: Female
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #6 on: December 01, 2015, 02:21:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: TKGS
    Quote from: Jorge Bergoglio
    Today I went to the mosque, I prayed there.


    Interestingly, this is precisely the example that Saint Thomas gives as evidence of apostasy.  But we all already knew he is an apostate, though some of us are in denial and most of us say that it doesn't matter that the pope's an apostate.


    I was astounded to read this, even from JB.   How could ANYONE who identifies as Catholic seriously pray in a mosque, let alone the titular leader of the Roman Catholic Church, which has dogmatically declared Islamists to be infidels?  And why would you even walk into a mosque in the first place?

    I have to wonder about that rumored brain tumor.

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1158/-863
    • Gender: Male
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #7 on: December 01, 2015, 02:24:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: TKGS
    Quote from: Jorge Bergoglio
    Today I went to the mosque, I prayed there.


    Interestingly, this is precisely the example that Saint Thomas gives as evidence of apostasy.  But we all already knew he is an apostate, though some of us are in denial and most of us say that it doesn't matter that the pope's an apostate.


    Yeah.

    "He's still the Pope."
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church


    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #8 on: December 01, 2015, 02:54:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth


    First, people must preach from the housetops that these charlatans are not legitimate Catholic authorities.  Once the Novus Ordo Sect is no longer taken seriously in its claim to being the Catholic Church, it will fall apart.  Imagine how powerful we would be if all resistance adherents became public Sedevacantists. The new church would be embarrassed to the bone. Plus, we reproduce. We must have a situation where people publicly laugh at the idea that Mr Cupich is the archbishop of Chicago, for example.  And we must convert the Swiss Guards.  :wink: Conversion of the Vatican would be great, but for the safety of souls, they must first be expelled.  All they have accomplished, apart from leading billions to Hell, is to totally mess up Catholic ecclesiology, where heretics are part of the Church etc.  To say Cupich is a heretic but insist he's still a Catholic archbishop doesn't accomplish anything.  Those of good will (the laity, invalid and valid priests, and bishops) need a sure guide whom they can be sure will give them bread instead of stones or the Eucharist instead of bread.



    I have a few thoughts regarding the above explanation. I can understand how you might believe that we just need to inform people, as much as possible, that the authorities in Rome are not legitimate Catholic authorities. The problem with this is that many (most) traditionalists do hold the SV view, so they cannot, in good conscience and sincerity, preach something that they do not believe. It would be dishonest.

    Regarding..."Once the Novus Ordo Sect is no longer taken seriously...", well, I just don't think that the majority of Catholics are going to adopt the SV position, under any circuмstances that I can think of. Even if all trads became SV, which isn't really possible, I don't think that they would be taken seriously, because it really doesn't make sense to people. Catholics are supposed to have a Pope, whether he's good or bad.

    Informing people of what truth is isn't always that difficult, but it needs to be a truth that has the possibility of being accepted. In my opinion.

    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #9 on: December 01, 2015, 03:21:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: TKGS
    Quote from: Jorge Bergoglio
    Today I went to the mosque, I prayed there.

    Interestingly, this is precisely the example that Saint Thomas gives as evidence of apostasy.  But we all already knew he is an apostate, though some of us are in denial and most of us say that it doesn't matter that the pope's an apostate.


    Thank you for that note.  It is interesting indeed.  Nice catch, TKGS.

    On the mainstream media these days you can see defenders of Hilary Clinton saying that she is the front runner for the Dem nomination and has a strong chance of winning the election, but they stop short of saying she is a liar;  in fact, when asked specifically, they defer from uttering that word in her description.  Then the opposition says she lies, and lies and lies, but that's normal for her, and her constituency expects lies because that's where she comes from:  from a history of lies, so it's nothing new.  

    If we can have Catholics today who are Democrats in America, this goes a long way towards explaining why Pope Francis can get away with saying blatant words of apostasy and the Catholics who hear him don't have any problem with it.  

    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #10 on: December 01, 2015, 03:26:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Meg
    I can understand how you might believe that we just need to inform people, as much as possible, that the authorities in Rome are not legitimate Catholic authorities. The problem with this is that many (most) traditionalists do hold the SV view, so they cannot, in good conscience and sincerity, preach something that they do not believe. It would be dishonest.

    This makes no sense to me.  You're contradicting yourself, Meg.

    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #11 on: December 01, 2015, 03:33:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Bellator Dei

    Whether one accepts the truth or not, it should not deter us from proclaiming it.

    John 8:32 - And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

    Quote from: Matthew 10:34-35
    Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword. For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

    Douay-Rheims Commentary - I came to set a man at variance: Not that this was the end or design of the coming of our Saviour; but that his coming and his doctrine would have this effect, by reason of the obstinate resistance that many would make, and of their persecuting all such as should adhere to him.




    As far as resisting those in authority in the Church, isn't that what the SSPX has historically done, while ABL was alive? He resisted without becoming SV. There is not need to become SV in order to resist a Pope.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #12 on: December 01, 2015, 03:34:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Neil Obstat
    Quote from: Meg
    I can understand how you might believe that we just need to inform people, as much as possible, that the authorities in Rome are not legitimate Catholic authorities. The problem with this is that many (most) traditionalists do hold the SV view, so they cannot, in good conscience and sincerity, preach something that they do not believe. It would be dishonest.

    This makes no sense to me.  You're contradicting yourself, Meg.

    .


    No, not a contradiction. SV's want all trads to adopt the SV position. How is that possible, when most don't believe the SV position? Do you want trads to all be forced to adopt the SV position without believing that it's true?
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #13 on: December 01, 2015, 03:45:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Dominicans of Avrille have two recent articles called...'On the Deposition of the Pope'. They use two or three sources, and one of the sources is particularly interesting, and includes points made on the subject by Cajetan, which no doubt the SV's have an understanding of already.

    Catejans's SECOND POINT in the theological realm says that the power of a pope is not derived from the Church, nor does it come from her, but from Christ, therefore never is the power of the Church superior  to that of the Pope, even in case of heresy. It's also mentioned that Christ prescribed only to avoid the heretic, to be separated from him, not to communicate with him. There isn't anything, that I can see from Cajetan's point that says that the faithful are to declare him as not being the Pope, and the Church as having apostacized.

    http://www.dominicansavrille.us/on-the-deposition-of-the-pope-part-1-of-2/
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Francis Makes Another Mess: Chaos Interview during Return Flight from
    « Reply #14 on: December 01, 2015, 04:03:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Bellator Dei


    On the other hand, Catholics who believe that Bergoglio is the pope and set up churches and parishes and celebrate Mass outside of communion with him and his diocesan bishops; they hold a schismatic position.      

     


    Then you believe that Archbishop Lefebvre was a schismatic or at least held a schismatic position, is that correct?
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29