Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Francis Denies Divinity of Christ  (Read 22489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Francis Denies Divinity of Christ
« Reply #145 on: October 14, 2019, 10:10:21 AM »
Poche, the devil is the author of the FIRST sin (his own).  You can’t blame him for what you confess to a priest, that’s called free will and you chose evil.  You could say the devil is the author of all temptation but not all sins.  As usual, +Francis’ theology is embarrassingly inept and shockingly blasphemous.

Re: Francis Denies Divinity of Christ
« Reply #146 on: October 14, 2019, 12:23:44 PM »
I totally agree. I too put Mark 79 on ignore a couple of months ago. I'm glad that this forum has that option.
I'm glad it has the feature as well.
Thank you, Meg!  :)


Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Francis Denies Divinity of Christ
« Reply #147 on: October 14, 2019, 12:54:42 PM »
I'm glad it has the feature as well.
Thank you, Meg!  :)
I am soooooo hurt. [sniff]

Re: Francis Denies Divinity of Christ
« Reply #148 on: October 14, 2019, 04:12:19 PM »
You have to be beyond imbecilic to suggest "made sin" and "was made a devil" are interchangeable. Let's pretend sin = devil, which just isn't true but we'll accept that for sake of argument. "made a devil" is not at all the same as "was made a devil". Just because God made the devil doesn't mean He made HIMSELF the devil. That's ridiculous. The watchmaker made a watch, therefore the watchmaker turned himself into a watch? Trying to pretend like those two entirely different things are somehow the exact same, in some desperate attempt to defend a dubious quote, is not only intellectually dishonest but also just plain stupid. Who do you expect to buy that nonsense? 

Re: Francis Denies Divinity of Christ
« Reply #149 on: October 14, 2019, 07:33:09 PM »


Quote
VCR:  The last 3 Popes broke first commandment by participating in false gods worship. They rejected Jesus.

Finally, a two sentence summary that I, a simple man, can easily understand and digest.  Wasn’t that a pope kissing the Koran? Weren’t those two popes flanked by an assorted leaders and teachers, representing false sects and strange religions? Wasn’t that a pope drinking some kind of slop in a shallow bowl, offered to him by a half naked shaman? Weren’t those popes visiting various mosques and ѕуηαgσgυєs, even going barefoot, hugging any rabbi or iman who would submit to their embraces.

These “popes,” collectively, have broken the 1st commandment over and over again.  It's in their writings.  It's in their public statements. It's depicted in numerous videos.  Real popes do not break the 1st commandment, at least that’s what I’ve always understood. They may have broken others, but the first one, never, to my knowledge  Show me one real pope, historically, who broke the 1st commandment, and was still considered to be a legitimate pope by the Church.
 
But I'm open to a correction of the historical record from anyone, except, of course, Poche. There are limits.

I know, I know.  When the next heretic is elected by the College of queers, Jews and communists, he and they can then decide together whether their immediate predecessors were indeed real popes or not.