Vow of obedience doesn't include selling Church property to a satanist.    

Yes, that is correct. The vow of obedience is primarily to God. But it is also to those who hold the place as His representatives on earth. The mother superior says, "It is your turn to do the dishes." then it is her turn to do the dishes. The mother superior could be an evil person but in her capacity as mother superior she holds the place as God's representative and the sisters have taken a vow that they will obey her. If the mother superior were to say, "Don't go to mass on Sunday" or "I want you to sell drugs on the street corner." I could see disobedience. Sometimes we have to resist the evil that is among us. But in a property sale I just think that the sisters wrong.      

When the sisters entered religious life they took three vows, the vow of poverty, chastity and obedience.
A vow is a solemn promise that one makes to God. These are solemn promises that are not made lightly that where you can hold your hands behind your back and cross your fingers. These are not the false promises of the Pharisees where if you swore by the Temple or the altar you were not obligated. These are promises that need to be fulfilled. The most famous of the promises is chastity, and while it is important it is not the first. The first is poverty. By the vow of poverty the religious gives up all right to the disposal of whatever goods they happen to possess.
For example, if you were to give $20 to a priest of the Society of St Pius X and say, "Go have a good time with this Father." He could go to the mass or to a restaurant etc... (The SSPX don't take a vow of poverty) On the other hand if you give this same $20 ti a religious sister and say, "Go have a good time with this sister." She would have to bring that money back to the convent and it would be the mother superior who decides how the $20 would be spent. The property really doesn't belong to them it in the sense that they really own it. It is only given in trust, but it is their superiors who can decide ultimately what actually happens to it.
      

Why didn't they use the property as a retreat center? Why didn't these nuns just donate the property to a thriving Catholic order?   And where is their Mother Superior?  ( they wanted to sell the property to a restaurant owner)

For the diocese to go to court against the sisters to sell property  to satanist is pure evil.  
 

Poche,

You lack discernment.

The Nuns had a duty to protect the property from desecration as much as they could.

The court injustice was so dramatic, that one of the Nuns died from the stress of it all.

You just can't seem to discern that the Novus ordo SCHISM, that has infiltrated our Catholic Church is selling off and desecrating Her assets.



It's everywhere... in your face, but you don't want to see it.

They also made a vow of poverty which means that while technically they may own the property their right to dispose of the property is dependent on the interpretation of their superiors (aka the bishop)

.
Did they also make a vow to abandon their Faith when given the command to do so by their superior?
What's that vow called, the vow of apostasy?
.
I knew a lifelong faithful nun who was faced with making enormous changes in 1969, when she was about 58 years old, and went to ask family members if she was wrong to be considering leaving her convent. She had spent about 40 years in missionary work with the Victory Knoll Sisters, working in remote places like Calexico near the Mexico border, teaching catechism, caring for the sick, and being a model of Our Lady to the poor. Her superior wanted her to get rid of her habit, and go out into the world looking for a job.

If Poche was a woman, he'd be pregnant in no time flat.

Oh, holding hands is OK. Oh, going walking by ourselves is OK. OH, kissing me on the cheek is OK. Oh, tickling my back is OK...………..