Author Topic: Michael Dimonds "MHFM" Reckless Driving Reported to Sheriff (Read 8536 times)

lewis · « **Reply #75 on:** May 15, 2011, 09:37:28 AM »

Quote from: Raoul76

Anne Catherine Emmerich said:
Quote
October, 1820

“As I was going through Rome with St. Francoise and the other saint, we saw a great palace engulfed in flames from top to bottom. I was very much afraid that the occupants would be burned to death because no one came forward to put out the fire. As we came nearer, however, the fire abated and we saw the blackened building. We went through a number of magnificent rooms (untouched by the fire), and we finally reached the Pope. He was sitting in the dark and slept in a large arm-chair. He was very ill and weak; he could no longer walk. The ecclesiastics in the inner circle looked insincere and lacking in zeal; I did not like them. I told the Pope of the bishops who are to be appointed soon. I told him also that he must not leave Rome. If he did so, it would be chaos. He thought that the evil was inevitable and that he should leave in order to save many things beside himself. He was very much inclined to leave Rome, and he was insistently urged to do so. ..."

This is clearly speaking of St. Pius X, I am sure of it.

Pius X was a "public" pope.

August 10, 1820

Venerable Anne-Catherine Emmerich Vision of the true impeded/hidden pope:

"He (the pope) can now trust but few people. That is mainly why he is hiding."

“Last night I was taken to Rome where the Holy Father immersed in his sorrow, is still hiding to ELUDE dangerous demands (made upon him by his captors). He is still very weak, and exhausted by sorrows, cares and prayers. He can now trust but few people. That is mainly why he is hiding. But he still has with him an aged priest who has much simplicity and godliness. He is his friend and because of his simplicity they did not think it would be worth removing him. But this man receives many graces from God. He sees and notices a great many things which he faithfully reports to the Holy Father. It was required of me to inform him while he was praying, of the traitors and evil doers who were to be found among the high ranking servants living close to him, so that he might be made aware of it”

“I see the Holy Father in great anguish. He lives in a palace other than before and he admits only a limited number of friends near him. I fear that the Holy Father will suffer many more trials before he dies. I see that the false Church of darkness is making progress and I see the dreadful influence it has on the people. The Holy Father and the Church are verily in so great a distress that one must implore God night and day…”

“I have been told to pray much for the Church and the (lawful) Pope…The people must pray earnestly for the extirpation (destruction) of the dark church (and its antipope).”

============

"I saw one of my successors taking to flight over the bodies of his brethren. He will take refuge in DISGUISE somewhere; and after a short retirement he will die a cruel death." (Prophecy of Pius X, who was publicly declared a saint)

lewis · « **Reply #76 on:** May 15, 2011, 09:44:57 AM »

Quote from: DecemRationis

Lewis,

Quote
There is a historical precedent of at least one "non-visible pope", or what could be called a "pope in eclipse", before. He prudently hid himself for approximately eight years in the catacombs, in perfect uniformity with God's Will. That Holy Father was declared a saint and intercedes for the true Church Militant today.

And who was that?

Pope Saint Caius

lewis · « **Reply #77 on:** May 15, 2011, 01:40:21 PM »

Quote from: Hobbledehoy

their (the Dimond's) ridiculous errors.

I would add DAMNING Error(s)!

Here is content from a Dimond Brothers video from Berlin, NJ; they don't want known ... actually I will start a new thread.

They are heretics and may be Marrano's ...

"Our enemies have on this been under no misapprehensions. From the outset, and with the greatest clearness of vision, they determined on their objective; first to separate you from Us and the Chair of Peter, and then to sow disorder among you." -Pope, St. Pius X

DecemRationis · « **Reply #78 on:** May 15, 2011, 01:54:20 PM »

Thank you, Lewis.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #79 on:** May 17, 2011, 02:08:48 PM »

Well, he is right that the Dimonds are highly dangerous. What strikes me about them is that their website is so prominent for two non-monk nobodies. There's no way to know if they are Marranos or infiltrators or not, though, as with so many people, it suffices to know they are spreading poisonous ideas and to stay away from their site. I was infected myself, though never becoming a full-blown Feeneyite ( see my sig ).

Raoul76 · « **Reply #80 on:** May 17, 2011, 02:15:37 PM »

However, was I really infected by the Dimonds, or by the devil directly, and I just used the Dimonds to bolster my supposed case?

Because of my whole experience with scrupulosity, I know that many of these people who say ridiculous things are not Marranos, but are mostly battling with pride. I think the devil makes certain people WANT to be the last Catholic on Earth -- it makes them feel heroic.

It is noticeable to me that some of the smartest people are in the most danger. The Dimonds are very smart; Gerry Matatics is very smart; I am no pea-brain myself. Something else I've noticed is that those who try to be notable laymen, who go on the lecture circuit, who make YouTube videos, put themselves more at risk of intellectual pride ( not to say vanity ). Someone like John Lane became a notable layman very naturally, but others thrust themselves out there in a really pushy way, like Gerry Matatics. He was apparently well-known as a Protestant and it's like, as soon as he became Catholic, he has to go around lecturing, he has to be an authority. Was that God's will?

I'd say all these little home-alone movements are caused by intellectual pride rather than infiltrators. It's about people desiring to be the center of attention and then contriving some excuse to make it happen, some new theory to get others to rally around. I'm sure many heretics started like this, just wanting to be original and get noticed. It's like you feel you need validation for your intelligence, so you break with God's will and you step out on your own, you trick yourself into thinking you have some mission that you don't have.

The solution, as St. Augustine says -- who was not unlike Gerry Matatics at all, a man very vulnerable to intellectual pride, as a quick glance at his painfully prolonged conversion shows -- is "If thou wouldst be great, make thyself the least first." It is other people who will decide if we are great, if we should be listened to, not ourselves. Many saints gradually built respect over long years of good works and sermons, after shunning the limelight it was thrust upon them. Today people do the opposite, they seek the limelight.

Darcy · « **Reply #81 on:** May 18, 2011, 12:00:38 PM »

Quote from: Raoul76

However, was I really infected by the Dimonds, or by the devil directly, and I just used the Dimonds to bolster my supposed case?

Because of my whole experience with scrupulosity, I know that many of these people who say ridiculous things are not Marranos, but are mostly battling with pride. I think the devil makes certain people WANT to be the last Catholic on Earth -- it makes them feel heroic.

It is noticeable to me that some of the smartest people are in the most danger. The Dimonds are very smart; Gerry Matatics is very smart; I am no pea-brain myself. Something else I've noticed is that those who try to be notable laymen, who go on the lecture circuit, who make YouTube videos, put themselves more at risk of intellectual pride ( not to say vanity ). Someone like John Lane became a notable layman very naturally, but others thrust themselves out there in a really pushy way, like Gerry Matatics. He was apparently well-known as a Protestant and it's like, as soon as he became Catholic, he has to go around lecturing, he has to be an authority. Was that God's will?

I'd say all these little home-alone movements are caused by intellectual pride rather than infiltrators. It's about people desiring to be the center of attention and then contriving some excuse to make it happen, some new theory to get others to rally around. I'm sure many heretics started like this, just wanting to be original and get noticed. It's like you feel you need validation for your intelligence, so you break with God's will and you step out on your own, you trick yourself into thinking you have some mission that you don't have.

The solution, as St. Augustine says -- who was not unlike Gerry Matatics at all, a man very vulnerable to intellectual pride, as a quick glance at his painfully prolonged conversion shows -- is "If thou wouldst be great, make thyself the least first." It is other people who will decide if we are great, if we should be listened to, not ourselves. Many saints gradually built respect over long years of good works and sermons, after shunning the limelight it was thrust upon them. Today people do the opposite, they seek the limelight.

My comment regards 'infiltrators'. I agree that the loners are likely besieged with pride as you describe and those that follow are afflicted with a sort of idolatrous guru worship or severe anxiety that manifests as scrupulosity.
The infiltrators would not have much need for smallish movements but are much more likely to be in larger movements that are gaining ground. Movements that are flesh and blood, where people really get out and talk to each other in person.

That is because relationships that form in person are more likely to be stronger.