Author Topic: Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke (Read 2590 times)

Petertherock · « **on:** February 24, 2015, 01:25:17 PM »

Yup...I know a lot of people don't like Voris and I'm one of them...but this needs to get out there.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/a4T6TGZIhKs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]

Ladislaus · « **Reply #1 on:** February 25, 2015, 08:11:18 AM »

Extremely vulgar and hostile objections to any opposition against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity invariably come from the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. Looks like the Basilian order has become infiltrated by homos at the top.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #2 on:** February 25, 2015, 11:01:02 AM »

Tim Scott sounds like one of those horrific St. Sebastion's Angels creatures.

PerEvangelicaDicta · « **Reply #3 on:** February 25, 2015, 11:39:44 AM »

I thought Mr. Voris was saying "the Bazillions".

Ladislaus · « **Reply #4 on:** February 25, 2015, 12:26:34 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

Extremely vulgar and hostile objections to any opposition against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity invariably come from the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. Looks like the Basilian order has become infiltrated by homos at the top.

I'll probably get sued for posting this. But at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #5 on:** February 25, 2015, 12:32:48 PM »

By the way, is Voris wearing pink lipstick in that video (accepted by the tie)?

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #6 on:** February 25, 2015, 12:38:20 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

By the way, is Voris wearing pink lipstick in that video (accepted by the tie)?

:roll-laugh2:

Ladislaus · « **Reply #7 on:** February 25, 2015, 12:55:13 PM »

Quote from: Capt McQuigg

Quote from: Ladislaus
By the way, is Voris wearing pink lipstick in that video (accepted by the tie)?

:roll-laugh2:

Sorry. I meant to type "accentuated" but got momentarily distracted.

I'm only partly joking. Watch the video.

Contrast it with other Voris videos; that's not his natural lip color.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #8 on:** February 25, 2015, 01:08:30 PM »

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post/something-queer-about-that-face/

You could ask my wife; I have an extremely high accuracy rate.

Tim Scott -- check
Thomas Rosica -- check
Michael Voris -- check

Unfortunately, I have similar vibes about a certain number of Traditional Catholic priests, but I won't mention names based on the "gαydar" alone.

IllyricumSacrum · « **Reply #9 on:** February 26, 2015, 12:46:57 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post/something-queer-about-that-face/

You could ask my wife; I have an extremely high accuracy rate.

Tim Scott -- check
Thomas Rosica -- check
Michael Voris -- check

Unfortunately, I have similar vibes about a certain number of Traditional Catholic priests, but I won't mention names based on the "gαydar" alone.

[/q

Much fewer in number than the N.O. But, man, do they stick out.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #10 on:** February 26, 2015, 06:12:55 AM »

Quote from: IllyricuмSacrum

Much fewer in number than the N.O. But, man, do they stick out.

Yep. I knew the entire Society of Saint John group before they were publicly exposed; ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs are actually quite attracted (via the "queer eye" phenomenon) to the aesthetics of the Tridentine Mass, so Traditional Catholics need to be especially vigilant.

Marlelar · « **Reply #11 on:** February 26, 2015, 09:41:20 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

... at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.

How?

Marsha

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #12 on:** February 27, 2015, 01:46:22 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus

Extremely vulgar and hostile objections to any opposition against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity invariably come from the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.

It's similar to sprinkling holy water on a demon or somebody under demonic possession.

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #13 on:** February 27, 2015, 02:56:56 AM »

Quote from: Marlelar

Quote from: Ladislaus
... at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.

How?

Marsha

Good point. Negative proof is a logical fallacy. A negative really can't be proven. Conversely, a pervert fag can go up to woman and kiss her as a means of displaying that he's "not a homo", but such act would be a charade. Likewise, it cannot be expected of a priest to engage in any sinful act or gesture with a woman in order to prove he's not a pervert fag.

Good old fashion "gαydar", discernment, honesty and prudential ability of vocation directors is necessary to weed out the pervert fαɢs from the selection process of entering seminaries. The key is to have a Faithful and loyal member of Holy Mother Church as vocational directors who are intrepid in being on guard against trojan horses of the perverted kind...

Ladislaus · « **Reply #14 on:** February 27, 2015, 05:23:12 AM »

Quote from: Marlelar

Quote from: Ladislaus
... at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.

How?

Marsha

Because they would be suing me for implying the contrary. If they're actually the ones bringing the lawsuit, they have to prove my statements wrong. I'm talking about the context of a civil suit.