Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Crisis in the Church => Topic started by: Petertherock on February 24, 2015, 01:25:17 PM
-
Yup...I know a lot of people don't like Voris and I'm one of them...but this needs to get out there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4T6TGZIhKs
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/a4T6TGZIhKs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]
-
Extremely vulgar and hostile objections to any opposition against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity invariably come from the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. Looks like the Basilian order has become infiltrated by homos at the top.
-
Tim Scott sounds like one of those horrific St. Sebastion's Angels creatures.
-
I thought Mr. Voris was saying "the Bazillions".
-
Extremely vulgar and hostile objections to any opposition against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity invariably come from the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. Looks like the Basilian order has become infiltrated by homos at the top.
I'll probably get sued for posting this. But at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.
-
By the way, is Voris wearing pink lipstick in that video (accepted by the tie)?
-
By the way, is Voris wearing pink lipstick in that video (accepted by the tie)?
:roll-laugh2:
-
By the way, is Voris wearing pink lipstick in that video (accepted by the tie)?
:roll-laugh2:
Sorry. I meant to type "accentuated" but got momentarily distracted.
I'm only partly joking. Watch the video.
Contrast it with other Voris videos; that's not his natural lip color.
-
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post/something-queer-about-that-face/
You could ask my wife; I have an extremely high accuracy rate.
Tim Scott -- check
Thomas Rosica -- check
Michael Voris -- check
Unfortunately, I have similar vibes about a certain number of Traditional Catholic priests, but I won't mention names based on the "gαydar" alone.
-
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post/something-queer-about-that-face/
You could ask my wife; I have an extremely high accuracy rate.
Tim Scott -- check
Thomas Rosica -- check
Michael Voris -- check
Unfortunately, I have similar vibes about a certain number of Traditional Catholic priests, but I won't mention names based on the "gαydar" alone.
[/q
Much fewer in number than the N.O. But, man, do they stick out.
-
Much fewer in number than the N.O. But, man, do they stick out.
Yep. I knew the entire Society of Saint John group before they were publicly exposed; ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs are actually quite attracted (via the "queer eye" phenomenon) to the aesthetics of the Tridentine Mass, so Traditional Catholics need to be especially vigilant.
-
... at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.
How?
Marsha
-
Extremely vulgar and hostile objections to any opposition against ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity invariably come from the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.
It's similar to sprinkling holy water on a demon or somebody under demonic possession.
-
... at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.
How?
Marsha
Good point. Negative proof is a logical fallacy. A negative really can't be proven. Conversely, a pervert fag can go up to woman and kiss her as a means of displaying that he's "not a homo", but such act would be a charade. Likewise, it cannot be expected of a priest to engage in any sinful act or gesture with a woman in order to prove he's not a pervert fag.
Good old fashion "gαydar", discernment, honesty and prudential ability of vocation directors is necessary to weed out the pervert fαɢs from the selection process of entering seminaries. The key is to have a Faithful and loyal member of Holy Mother Church as vocational directors who are intrepid in being on guard against trojan horses of the perverted kind...
-
... at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.
How?
Marsha
Because they would be suing me for implying the contrary. If they're actually the ones bringing the lawsuit, they have to prove my statements wrong. I'm talking about the context of a civil suit.