Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke  (Read 2392 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Petertherock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 673
  • Reputation: +0/-0
    • h
Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
« on: February 24, 2015, 01:25:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yup...I know a lot of people don't like Voris and I'm one of them...but this needs to get out there.



    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/a4T6TGZIhKs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/youtube]


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17390
    • Reputation: +9708/-4263
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #1 on: February 25, 2015, 08:11:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Extremely vulgar and hostile objections to any opposition against homosexuality invariably come from the homosexuals.  Looks like the Basilian order has become infiltrated by homos at the top.


    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4847
    • Reputation: +2190/-7
    • Gender: Female
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #2 on: February 25, 2015, 11:01:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Tim Scott sounds like one of those horrific St. Sebastion's Angels creatures.

    Offline PerEvangelicaDicta

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2050
    • Reputation: +1285/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #3 on: February 25, 2015, 11:39:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I thought Mr. Voris was saying "the Bazillions".

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17390
    • Reputation: +9708/-4263
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #4 on: February 25, 2015, 12:26:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Extremely vulgar and hostile objections to any opposition against homosexuality invariably come from the homosexuals.  Looks like the Basilian order has become infiltrated by homos at the top.


    I'll probably get sued for posting this.  But at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact homosexuals.




    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17390
    • Reputation: +9708/-4263
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #5 on: February 25, 2015, 12:32:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • By the way, is Voris wearing pink lipstick in that video (accepted by the tie)?

    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4662
    • Reputation: +2618/-9
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #6 on: February 25, 2015, 12:38:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    By the way, is Voris wearing pink lipstick in that video (accepted by the tie)?


     :roll-laugh2:


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17390
    • Reputation: +9708/-4263
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #7 on: February 25, 2015, 12:55:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Capt McQuigg
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    By the way, is Voris wearing pink lipstick in that video (accepted by the tie)?


     :roll-laugh2:



    Sorry.  I meant to type "accentuated" but got momentarily distracted.

    I'm only partly joking.  Watch the video.

    Contrast it with other Voris videos; that's not his natural lip color.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17390
    • Reputation: +9708/-4263
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #8 on: February 25, 2015, 01:08:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post/something-queer-about-that-face/

    You could ask my wife; I have an extremely high accuracy rate.

    Tim Scott -- check
    Thomas Rosica -- check
    Michael Voris -- check

    Unfortunately, I have similar vibes about a certain number of Traditional Catholic priests, but I won't mention names based on the "gaydar" alone.


    Offline IllyricumSacrum

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 171
    • Reputation: +86/-2
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #9 on: February 26, 2015, 12:46:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post/something-queer-about-that-face/

    You could ask my wife; I have an extremely high accuracy rate.

    Tim Scott -- check
    Thomas Rosica -- check
    Michael Voris -- check

    Unfortunately, I have similar vibes about a certain number of Traditional Catholic priests, but I won't mention names based on the "gaydar" alone.

    [/q




    Much fewer in number than the N.O. But, man, do they stick out.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17390
    • Reputation: +9708/-4263
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #10 on: February 26, 2015, 06:12:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: IllyricumSacrum
    Much fewer in number than the N.O. But, man, do they stick out.


    Yep.  I knew the entire Society of Saint John group before they were publicly exposed; homosexuals are actually quite attracted (via the "queer eye" phenomenon) to the aesthetics of the Tridentine Mass, so Traditional Catholics need to be especially vigilant.


    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3475
    • Reputation: +1810/-231
    • Gender: Female
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #11 on: February 26, 2015, 09:41:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    ... at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact homosexuals.


    How?

    Marsha

    Offline Croix de Fer

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3219
    • Reputation: +2306/-2192
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #12 on: February 27, 2015, 01:46:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Extremely vulgar and hostile objections to any opposition against homosexuality invariably come from the homosexuals.  


    It's similar to sprinkling holy water on a demon or somebody under demonic possession.
    Blessed be the Lord my God, who teacheth my hands to fight, and my fingers to war. ~ Psalms 143:1 (Douay-Rheims)

    Offline Croix de Fer

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3219
    • Reputation: +2306/-2192
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #13 on: February 27, 2015, 02:56:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Marlelar
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    ... at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact homosexuals.


    How?

    Marsha


    Good point. Negative proof is a logical fallacy. A negative really can't be proven. Conversely, a pervert fag can go up to woman and kiss her as a means of displaying that he's "not a homo", but such act would be a charade. Likewise, it cannot be expected of a priest to engage in any sinful act or gesture with a woman in order to prove he's not a pervert fag.

    Good old fashion "Gaydar", discernment, honesty and prudential ability of vocation directors is necessary to weed out the pervert fags from the selection process of entering seminaries. The key is to have a Faithful and loyal member of Holy Mother Church as vocational directors who are intrepid in being on guard against trojan horses of the perverted kind...
    Blessed be the Lord my God, who teacheth my hands to fight, and my fingers to war. ~ Psalms 143:1 (Douay-Rheims)

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17390
    • Reputation: +9708/-4263
    • Gender: Male
    Fr. Tim Scott: STFU Cardinal Burke
    « Reply #14 on: February 27, 2015, 05:23:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Marlelar
    Quote from: Ladislaus
    ... at least it would force the priests to have to prove that they are not in fact homosexuals.


    How?

    Marsha


    Because they would be suing me for implying the contrary.  If they're actually the ones bringing the lawsuit, they have to prove my statements wrong.  I'm talking about the context of a civil suit.


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16