Author Topic: Fr Robinson's new book "The Realist Guide to Religion and Science" (Read 8679 times)

cassini · « **Reply #20 on:** February 25, 2018, 12:29:39 PM »

Foreword to Fr Robinson's book.

https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/be041786-0638-4702-8262-80efb99dfec3/downloads/1c5r4kp28_40515.pdf

It seems Fr Robinson found inspiration in the conciliar popes, Paul VI. John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Pope Francis and Fr Stanley Jaki.

Fr Jaki was a Benedictine priest and distinguished Professor of Physics at Seton Hall University, New Jersey since 1975, indoctrinating his students in a heliocentric cosmology and natural evolution of one sort or another. For his work in synthesising Catholic faith with modern scientism Fr Jaki was awarded The Templeton Prize in 1987, ‘for furthering understanding of science and religion’ they say; a prize now valued at £1,000,000 per annum, winnable only by those who assert theistic heliocentrism and theistic evolutionism of course.

John Paul II said he loved Einstein's relativity but that this did not take from Galileo's heliocentrism. What a contradiction. He also told the flock there are proofs for heliocentrism and that the Fathers and popes who upheld geocentrism were ignorants.

In 1981, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (b.1927) later elected Pope Benedict XVI (2005-15), attempted a creation catechesis for adults in four Lenten homilies in the cathedral of Munich, and later published in a book called In the Beginning.[1] The reason for this subject matter, he wrote, was that the creation account is noticeably and nearly completely absent from Catholic catechesis, preaching and even theology. What he wanted to do was show that the Genesis account of creation in the first book of Scripture could indeed be interpreted in harmony with modern ‘science,’ a task first taken on by Galileo. By doing so, Joseph Ratzinger hoped to give back to Genesis a credibility that would please Catholics of today. Totally ignoring the absurdity of all evolutionary theories that we have discussed earlier in this tome, the Cardinal, by way of his ‘newspeak,’ with its ambiguous euphemistic language, tries to get us to believe that the ‘poetry’ of Genesis can be understood to agree with the exact same theories that ‘science’ invented, theories that are known to have convinced millions there is no God, no need for a God when trying to understand the universe and all in it.

[1] Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger: In The beginning, CFI Bath Press, UK.

Pope francis would baptise a MARTIAN if he asked.

Smedley Butler · « **Reply #21 on:** February 25, 2018, 01:06:16 PM »

If Robinson's book espouses heliocentrism and some sort of evolution, he is teaching heresy and the Society is lost.

Matthew · « **Reply #22 on:** February 25, 2018, 01:22:04 PM »

Quote from: Pax Vobis on January 30, 2018, 11:14:35 AM

The book didn't mention 'sspx seminary' because the sspx leadership wants to get rid of the 'us' vs 'them' mentality. Therefore a catholic seminary is a catholic seminary, whether it's sspx, fssp, novus ordo, etc.

Surely this is another sign that step-by-step, +Fellay is conditioning the faithful for a "deal". May God have mercy on his soul!

*sigh* more proof that the SSPX has lost it.

They did the same thing with some of their recent chapels. They don't want or claim the "Traditional" label anymore.

Fine, I won't attend their Masses then, since I'm looking for a Traditional Catholic chapel -- with a capital T!

Matthew · « **Reply #23 on:** February 25, 2018, 01:43:13 PM »

Quote from: Smedley Butler on February 25, 2018, 01:06:16 PM

If Robinson's book espouses heliocentrism and some sort of evolution, he is teaching heresy and the Society is lost.

The goodness of the SSPX doesn't hang upon the rectitude of one SSPX priest's doctrine.
The SSPX is lost either way.

cathman7 · « **Reply #24 on:** February 25, 2018, 02:52:09 PM »

Matthew, I think you posted this in the wrong place. I'll post it here:

Sean Johnson chimes in:

Friends-

Fr. Paul Robinson (SSPX) has recently written a book titled "The Realist Guide for Religion and Science," for which some information can be gleaned from this website promoting the book:

https://therealistguide.com/

On the following link, you can read an unbelievable 2-page Foreword, which seems to partially rehabilitate JPII, BXVI, Francis, and the deceased modernist Fr. Stanley Jaki as "moderate realists."

https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/be041786-0638-4702-8262-80efb99dfec3/downloads/1c5r4kp28_40515.pdf

Never mind that John Paul II espoused phenomenology (i.e., Objective truths exist, but human reason cannot access them, only their various manifestations, or "noumena.");

Never mind that BXVI was primarily a Hegelian.

Never mind that Francis (Francis!) is completely a-systemic, and the Foreword quotes him thusly:

Quote

Quote

"Pope Francis has also affirmed that realities are more important than ideas, and this flows from the doctrine of the Incarnation."

Let that quote, coming from an SSPX-promoted book, sink in: "Realities are more important than ideas."

This is the pollution coming from Bishop Fellay's ralliement: A practical accord (i.e., a reality) is more important than doctrine (i.e., ideas).

SSPX priests are being infected by their Superior General, and Fr. Robinson very obviously wanted to show the Vatican just how open the new SSPX is to conciliarist modernism.

And the deceased Fr. Stanley Jaki (whose organization has written this Foreword for Fr. Robinson)?

A thorough modernist, for whom science was superior to religion, having made many statements which implicitly deny the possibility of true miracles, such as this one regarding the miracle of the sun at Fatima:

Quote

Quote

"According to St. Thomas Aquinas a miracle in the strict sense is 'something done outside the order of the entire created universe.' According to Jaki, the fact that the event occurred and still inspires the faithful to this day is the greater miracle." http://www.catholicstand.com/fr-stanley-jaki-on-the-fatima-miracle/

And in Jaki's introduction to the English-language translation of Abbe Augustin Barruel's masterpiece "Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism" (which Weishaupt's conspiracy against altar, throne, and society), he makes this bewildering statement:

Quote

Quote

"The teaching of Thomas Aquinas and of Bellarmine, that the people were the ultimate source on earth of political authority and power, was not something that Barruel would fully appreciate." (p. xiv)

Some of you in this email are quite well read on St. Thomas Aquinas, and I should be extremely surprised if he ever taught such a thing!

Nonetheless, these are the people Fr. Robinson wants to promote his book: All of them conciliarist modernists to the man.

Obviously, the neo-SSPX is losing its mind (and its faith).

As time marches on, you can expect much more of this. It is only natural.

Cardinal Cottier would be quite pleased to see the "progress" Menzingen is making towards conciliarism, as he once counseled regarding Campos: "What is important is that there no longer be rejection in their hearts...we must be patient...gradually, we must expect additional steps, like concelebration...reconciliation carries within itself its own internal dynamism [self-censorship]."

Indeed it does, and Fr. Robinson's book is one more piece of evidence of that "dynamism."

Semper Idem,
Sean Johnson

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Fr Robinson's new book "The Realist Guide to Religion and Science" (Read 8679 times)

cassini

Re: Fr Robinson's new book "The Realist Guide to Religion and Science"

Smedley Butler

Re: Fr Robinson's new book "The Realist Guide to Religion and Science"

Matthew

Re: Fr Robinson's new book "The Realist Guide to Religion and Science"

Matthew

Re: Fr Robinson's new book "The Realist Guide to Religion and Science"

cathman7

Re: Fr Robinson's new book "The Realist Guide to Religion and Science"