I just read this on another forum, it was written by Fr. Paul Kramer, a longtime writer for the Fatima Crusader and Catholic Family News.  

"Pope" Francis in Evangelii Gaudium n. 247: "We hold the Jєωιѕн people in special regard because their covenant with God has never been revoked". This text is an explicit profession of heresy, directly opposed to the solemn dogmatic definition of Pope Eugenius III and the Ecuмenical Council of Florence, and the doctrine taught by the supreme magisterium of Pope Benedict XIV in Ex Quo Primum, set forth repeatedly and explicitly citing the definition of Florence, to wit, that the Mosaic covenant has been "revoked" and "abrogated". I have been saying for years that when a "pope" will officially teach explicit and clear heresy flatly contradicting the infallibly defined dogma of the Catholic faith, then you will know that he is the false pope prophecied in many Church approved prophecies and Marian apparitions. St. Robert Bellarmine, St. Alohonsus Liguori, St. Antoninus and Pope Innocent III all teach that when the pope demonstrates himself to be a manifest heretic, i.e. a plainly manifested public heretic, he ceases to be pope (or, if already was a public heretic he was invalidly elected) because he is not a Catholic -- not a member of the Catholic Church. Bellarmine explains that the Roman Pontiff is the visible head of the Church, and the head is a member. One who is not a member cannot be the head, and therefore the election to the supreme pontificate of a public heretic is canonically null & void. The heresy of Bergoglio in no. 247 is such a clear cut case of manifest, public heresy, expressed in stark, unequivocal terms, that it can be said without doubt that if this proposition of no. 247 is not manifestly heretical, then nothing else can be said to be so. It is morally impossible that one who manifestly displays such clearly expressed contempt for a defined dogma of faith by plainly denying it, can be believed to validly hold the office of Roman Pontiff. St. Francis of Assisi foretold of the uncanonically elected pope who would not be "a true pastor but a destroyer". Bergoglio plainly fits the description.

www.facebook.com/paul.kramer.1023611?fref=ts

I hope not either, but his courage for speaking the truth is edifying.  The logic he applies in formulating husband conclusion is airtight.

My last post should have read:

I hope not either, but his courage for speaking the truth is edifying.  The logic he applies in formulating his conclusion is airtight.

 

It's beautifully and succinctly put, guided entirely by Catholic principles with no recourse to novelty.  

Francis isn't the first V2 pope to hold this view.

I know, but maybe others are finally seeing this.  It is heresy to say that the Old Covenant is still in force, and has not been revoked.

Quote from: Ladislaus

Francis isn't the first V2 pope to hold this view.

I know, but maybe others are finally seeing this.  It is heresy to say that the Old Covenant is still in force, and has not been revoked.

It is heresy, but the very unique thing about this particular heresy is that it, probably more than any other, completely and directly undermines Catholicism in toto.

If the Jєωs covenant is not revoked, then just who exactly is this Jesus guy?!  I think we are learning more and more about Francis as time goes on, and now his comments where he seems to put undue emphasis in distinguishing the Father from the Son (There is no Catholic God, Jesus is my teacher, the Father is my light and Creator) are becoming more and more clear.  

He does not believe Christ came to fulfill the law, he does not believe in the New Testament, he does not believe in the Church which Christ founded upon the nullification of the Old Covenant.  He is a miserable, abominable blasphemer and heretic.

You don't see the biggest heresy when he denies the existence of God?

When did he do this?

That's not a denial of the existence of God.  If anything it's a denial of the Catholic Church.  Logic 101 people.

When you say things like that you merely discredit yourself.

That's not a denial of the existence of God.  If anything it's a denial of the Catholic Church.  Logic 101 people.

When you say things like that you merely discredit yourself.

You speak of logic?

There is one God.  That is the Catholic God.  To deny the Catholic God, Who is the only God, is to deny God.  

St Paul teaches that the gods of the gentiles are demons.  There is but One God, and He is the God of the Catholic Church.  To say that this God does not exist is to deny the existence of the one God.