Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Jenkins articulates Moderate (aka Opinionist) Sedevacantism  (Read 7379 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. Jenkins articulates Moderate (aka Opinionist) Sedevacantism
« Reply #20 on: June 25, 2020, 10:46:56 AM »
Uhm, he did not say they are not Catholic, but that they are not TRADTIONAL Catholic.  To my knowledge, he does not refuse the Sacraments to people from dogmatic sedevacantist chapels ... unless there's also a question of the +Thuc line, but that's for a different reason (that I don't agree with).  One would have to ask him precisely what he meant by that, since the term Traditional Catholics has about as many definitions as you have Traditional Catholics.



The author of the quote you're commenting on is not Struthio, but Yeti, see Reply #3.

Sorry if I got that wrong.  Looked like it was quoting you.

Re: Fr. Jenkins articulates Moderate (aka Opinionist) Sedevacantism
« Reply #21 on: June 27, 2020, 02:57:29 AM »
Where is Fr. Jenkins assigned?


Offline Cryptinox

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. Jenkins articulates Moderate (aka Opinionist) Sedevacantism
« Reply #22 on: June 27, 2020, 02:36:08 PM »
Where is Fr. Jenkins assigned?
Immaculate Conception Church in Norwood, Ohio

Re: Fr. Jenkins articulates Moderate (aka Opinionist) Sedevacantism
« Reply #23 on: June 27, 2020, 06:59:43 PM »
This video was from over 6 years ago. He may have changed his thinking somewhat since then.

I think it was last year that Fr. Cekada wrote an article saying that he sees evidence that once Bp. Kelly dies, the St. Piux V Society is likely to be not as harsh against the Thuc-line.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. Jenkins articulates Moderate (aka Opinionist) Sedevacantism
« Reply #24 on: June 27, 2020, 07:13:33 PM »
This video was from over 6 years ago. He may have changed his thinking somewhat since then.

I think it was last year that Fr. Cekada wrote an article saying that he sees evidence that once Bp. Kelly dies, the St. Piux V Society is likely to be not as harsh against the Thuc-line.

I've seen more recent statement where Fr. Jenkins articulates a similar position re: sedevacantism.  I agree that Bishop Kelly has been the strongest impetus against the Thuc line.