Yes Fr. Gruner backed out but Hugh Akins was fine with that at the time, but then (as reported by Hugh) Fr. Gruner decided that it was time to publish the book and lend his public support to Hugh's book, (also, it was about this time, most likely that he told Fr. Kramer to write a book about Pope Francis not being the pope) but then Fr. Gruner died before he could more forward with those plans. What would happen if Fr. Gruner did not die and he went ahead with both plans?
It sounds like someone had a good motive for killing Fr. Gruner by causing
his massive heart attack, which can be done using a pen-like instrument
that sprays a chemical developed by the KGB directly into the eyes.
With the recent death by poisoning of several Russian spies who worked for the
British, these sudden deaths by heart attack, cancer, and poisoning are no
longer a conspiracy theory, but a reality.
Who would oppose the printing and public support of Hugh's book?
And who would oppose the revelation that Francis was not the true pope?
It had to be someone who supported both the SSPX and Pope Francis.
Most likely John Vennari was also slipped some cancer causing agent.
He seemed like he was recovering only to become seriously ill once again.
His swift aggressive cancer could easily have been induced by several
cancer causing drugs or poisons that the Communists, the Mafia, and the
CIA have.
Again, follow the money. John Vennari was hitting hard at the Vatican II church
and brilliantly exposing all their freemason ties and lies. With his death and
that of Fr. Nicholas Gruner, any anti-Vatican II news stories would be stopped.
And indeed, the Fatima Center has been careful not to attack Francis or any of
Rome's previous popes. The voice of the Fatima Center, and the voices of Father
Gruner and John Vennari have all been silenced.
Curiously, the Fatima Center recently published
The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita and sent it to all on their mailing list. Was this a cover up to hide the
possible murders of Father Gruner and John Vennari?
Think about this. If the Fatima Center republished an expose written by John
Vennari in 1999 that was anti-freemasonic, then would not this suggest that they
were for John Vennari and had no motive for killing him?
Not likely. In 1999, Pope John Paul II was still the pope. The Roman Church had not
deteriorated to the state that it is in now. The SSPX was not dancing in step with
Francis in their attempt to have reunion with the Vatican. If John were alive today,
this very work would have been updated and would have caused waves.