Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Gregory Hesse website  (Read 2229 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline StLouisIX

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1351
  • Reputation: +1013/-116
  • Gender: Male
Fr. Gregory Hesse website
« on: April 26, 2020, 09:48:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I found this website some days ago, and thought that people here would appreciate it:
    https://www.gregorius-hesse.at/

    It seems to be an Austrian or German website dedicated to Fr. Gregory Hesse. Most notably, it seems that they are still selling his tapes, although these tapes are of conferences given in Germany and Austria back in the 90s and early 2000s, and mostly cover the subjects he discussed in his tapes/videos that were recorded in the US. However, it seems that there is also a collection of Fr. Hesse's sermons (in German) and also a series of pastoral letters he wrote explaining the liturgical year. I have been curious as to what Fr. Hesse's sermons were like, so I am glad to find that some were preserved via recording, even if they are in a language I don't understand. Also, this site contains a fair amount of biographical information as well as vintage photographs of Fr. Hesse.

     I hope one day that a user who is knowledgeable in the German language can properly translate the contents of this site, as the Google translate option seems to produce somewhat wacky results. 

    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2355
    • Reputation: +1523/-91
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Gregory Hesse website
    « Reply #1 on: April 27, 2020, 07:36:01 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • https://gregorius-hesse.at/person/


    To the person
    It is certainly unusual to dedicate a home page to a "simple" priest, who has remained unknown to many even in the circles of the traditional Catholic movement.

    Col. Hesse bags his colt

    But the career and personality of Dr. Gregorius Hesse are equally unusual. As a doctoral theologian and canon lawyer, he gave up his predetermined career in the Vatican when he realized that he could neither or wanted to come to terms with modernism, which prevailed in Rome.

    Without financial security, he lived in his Viennese homeland and had to earn his living through lecture tours and translation work. On the other hand, however, he enjoyed the freedoms that the emergency laws that came into force as a a rising act as a a force of the church crisis.

    Dr. Hesse distinguished the rare combination of great scholarship with the ability to pass on his knowledge in a comprehensible and engagingly entertaining way. –

    "Don Gregor's" friends will also be remembered for his unique, dazzling character:
    Just as Dr. Hesse was "professionally" a great admirer of Our Lady of Fatima, Popes Innocent III and Pius X, and Archbishop Lefebvres, he was privately an equally passionate tram driver, model railwayman and northern era. He was notorious for his food and drink resistance.

    And also visually Dr. Hesse fell out of his age:
    "The Talar is the correct uniform for the army of Christ, this garment has unfortunately become very life-threatening for me. Reasons for taste force me to return to the 19th century, because as every morally excellent person knows, the 20th century has not added anything to the culture of humanity in terms of clothing – on the contrary."


    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2355
    • Reputation: +1523/-91
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Gregory Hesse website
    « Reply #2 on: April 27, 2020, 07:40:26 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I have read Mein Kampf, I have also read the Koran and the Second Vatican Council. All three books have this in common: a deep truth, then complete nonsense, then a deep untruth, then again complete nonsense and then again a deep truth – really erratic. I therefore dare to assume that both the Koran and Mein Kampf, as well as the Second Vatican Council, have the same author.
    The most common word in the Council is the word "but".

    Offline CatholicMonarchist

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 132
    • Reputation: +40/-52
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Gregory Hesse website
    « Reply #3 on: April 27, 2020, 08:05:40 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • May God have mercy on Fr. Hesse. He was a great priest and a wonderful orator.
    Wonder is the desire for knowledge

    St. Thomas Aquinas

    Offline Kazimierz

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7680
    • Reputation: +3915/-88
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Gregory Hesse website
    « Reply #4 on: April 27, 2020, 11:38:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I have read Mein Kampf, I have also read the Koran and the Second Vatican Council. All three books have this in common: a deep truth, then complete nonsense, then a deep untruth, then again complete nonsense and then again a deep truth – really erratic. I therefore dare to assume that both the Koran and Mein Kampf, as well as the Second Vatican Council, have the same author.

    The most common word in the Council is the word "but".

    I had to study the V2 dysentery several times during my studies and that particular conjunction does appear in copious amounts.
    Jesus Christ is the Son of God but......  
    ( not actually said but the spirit of that heretical thought permeates the text, like doggy doo on newspaper)
    I gave my V2 texts the V2 treatment.(wink nudge)
    Never could manage the “Aloha Snackbar guide to killing infidels”
    Read Mein Kampf a few times during my academic studies. Mr Hilter  ;) and his plan pretty much spelled out therein. 
    Da pacem Domine in diebus nostris
    Qui non est alius
    Qui pugnet pro nobis
    Nisi  tu Deus noster


    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3283
    • Reputation: +2433/-420
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Gregory Hesse website
    « Reply #5 on: April 28, 2020, 07:28:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I have read Mein Kampf, I have also read the Koran and the Second Vatican Council. All three books have this in common: a deep truth, then complete nonsense, then a deep untruth, then again complete nonsense and then again a deep truth – really erratic. I therefore dare to assume that both the Koran and Mein Kampf, as well as the Second Vatican Council, have the same author.

    The most common word in the Council is the word "but".

    I'm sure MK was much more closer to the truth than the pedophilic rantings of the lunatics that authored VII and the Qu'ran. ::)

    Offline StLouisIX

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1351
    • Reputation: +1013/-116
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Gregory Hesse website
    « Reply #6 on: April 28, 2020, 10:08:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for the translations, Mr G!

    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2355
    • Reputation: +1523/-91
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Gregory Hesse website
    « Reply #7 on: April 28, 2020, 10:14:49 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Passion Sunday (April 6, 2003) 

    Today's Gospel is one of the most important of all, because Christ here bears clear witness to His divine nature by identifying with himself the name of God, EGO SUM, I AM: "Before Abraham became, I AM." Nevertheless, this is not the only lesson in this somewhat longer quotation from John, but rather one of the most difficult questions of our time is answered here:

    How is it possible that over three thousand(!) Bishops follow the supposedly ecuмenical Council of 1962-1965 and thus manifest contradictions with the Gospel and the teachings of the Church, not to mention their tolerance, promotion or even participation in an ever-increasing number of the most horrible sacrileges such as hand communion, intercommunion, communion with animals, consecration of practicing ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs or Protestants, etc.? (I can prove this and much more). How is it possible?

    Some, few and probably highly intelligent bishops know that they are trying to destroy the Church and they want it. The mere fact that Pope Leo XIII already had a secretary of state who was a Freemason and that one of the post-conciliar secretaries of state refused the sacraments at the deathbed proves this willingness to serve Satan.

    Other bishops – and there are many – are simply too stupid or too uneducated to see the contradictions and to consider the change of eternal truth impossible. After fifteen years in Rome, I can confirm from personal experience the large number of bishops who are incredibly stupid. This is so obvious that a former secretary of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura asked me the joke question: "Quid requiritur ad episcopatum" (What is needed for the episcopate?) and immediately added: "Respondeo: nihil" (I answer: nothing). A cardinal, for whom I worked for a short time, came to his office one day in a gloomy mood, and I asked him why. He mentioned the cardinal commission in which he had just participated, and with his face in his hands, he lamented, "They know nothing, they know nothing." Cardinals! Yet many of them are honest, pious, and even in some ways – ignorance is rarely completely innocent – sacred.

    But what about the bishops, who do not knowingly and willingly serve evil, nor are they stupid or ignorant, that is, with those who see the contradictions – to varying extent – but simply carry on without wanting to destroy the Church?

    Today's Gospel explains this phenomenon precisely using the example of the Pharisees:

    "If I tell you the truth, why don't you believe Me? He who is of God listens to God's word; therefore you do not listen to it, because you are not of God."

    What is the meaning of these words? It is quite obvious that Christ does not mean here the friendship of God, which results exclusively from the life of grace, which did not exist at that time, at least not in the sacramental sense. Who is then of God? Whoever listens to God's word says Christ, but why? To what quality of God does this word refer?

    To answer this question, we cannot use the absolute simplicity of God, which is fully explained in His real name I AM, we must resort to the description of the individual attributes, which are identical in God, to our sake: before we go through the whole Catechism, let us put it simply: of the many qualities of God, Christ refers to three in particular. He doesn't say, "I'm simplicity," "I'm perfection," or "I'm good." Nor does he say this—to preserve the order of Thomas Aquinas—about His infinity, immutability, eternity, unity, omniscience, justice, and mercy, but He says, "I am the way, the truth, and the life" (Jn 14:6). Of course, He is the life that comes only from God and can only be fulfilled in Him, and He is the only way to this completion. Our question is answered with the word 'truth'. Precisely because Christ himself is the truth, so is His Word truth.

    That is the crux of the matter. The bishops in the above and questionable category are simply people to whom other things are MUCH more important than the Word of God, the truth. Let us take the case of Germany as an example (it would be excessive to discuss all countries). Here one has to address a sore point in the German Christian soul, namely the church tax invented by Adolf Hitler, which he himself paid until April 1945(!), although as chancellor exempted from any tax. This church tax, which represents a huge minimum income, allows the dioceses to secure salaries, health insurance, pensions and expenses. This alone guarantees the seminarian – who is concerned about his future – the necessary adjustment, which is hammered solely by the abstruse theories of modernist theologians and the deeply rooted subconscious that the Second Vatican Council was "a new Pentecost." The parish practice with its "calming" security and various human vanities then leads for the "best" to the episcopate with its political power, improved material living conditions and public prestige. Which general or minister would make his office available because he is to obey a command that is against God's will??? Many certainly not (the general is probably still the most likely).

    It is a horrible error to think that the grace of the status can replace nature when Thomas says: "Gratia praesupponit naturam" (Grace presupposes nature).

    When one then asks the bishop why the seminaries are empty, the churches are becoming more and more empty and the faith in Germany is lost, they answer: "That is not so bad", "This is just the present day", "The Holy Father already knows what he is doing", "Do you want to doubt the wisdom of the Second Vatican Council?" If they were honest, they would say, "Yes, but that's why I'm not giving up my power, my palace, my prestige, my income, my age and health insurance, and most importantly my TV appearances!"
    Once you have spent three-quarters of your life in this basic setting, you are hardly open to the truth. Thus were the Pharisees hardened in their caste and power, so are the bishops today:

    "If I tell you the truth, why don't you believe Me? He who is of God listens to God's word; therefore you do not listen to it, because you are not of God."

    But this is only the second main reason, because after all, the Catholic is distinguished by LOVE, thus also by the LOVE to the truth:
    "And if I soed the gift of prophecy, and know all the mysteries with all knowledge, and if I had all faith, that I might set mountains, but i would not have love, I would be nothing" (1Cor. 13:2).

    Only from this love can our interest come: whoever loves God must think about Him!
    • Back• OverviewNext . . . . . . .


    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2355
    • Reputation: +1523/-91
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Gregory Hesse website
    « Reply #8 on: April 28, 2020, 10:16:13 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ascension Day (25 May 2006) 


    The Lord reproaches the hardness of the disciples' hearts. First Mary Magdalene came with the message applied by the angel in the grave, but they did not believe, then the disciples of Emmaus (Easter Monday) tell their message, "but they did not believe them either." So the Lord Self had to come.

    You can see how God is writing on crooked lines. The first high priests of the Catholic Church had to look back shamefully at their own difficulties of faith at the beginning. This is where the Lord hooks up and gives them the mission mission for the whole world. The expression of faith, which the Apostles so much lacked, is baptism. This faith, whose acceptance or rejection determines the eternal fate of a human being, will be confirmed by appropriate signs. However, these signs will only be granted to apostles or disciples who have "accepted the faith." This does not mean people for those for whose faith is something quite nice to live with, and in general, the alternatives are not so beautiful and so on. No. To those who, like the apostles, have fought their way through all the doubts of faith imposed by hard-heartedness or the devil, they will have the strength to work miracles.

    We have to set a bracket here. The Evangelist Mark writes in the spirit of a love unknown to most of us, which must have felt those who had gathered around the Son of God for seven years (apart from Judas). In the case of the people concerned, therefore, love and hope can be presumed, their problem is faith. In the more recent age of the Church, faith is a problem from time to time, Jansenists, Pietists, rationalists, modernists, neomodernists, they are a minority in the large number of Catholics, but the love that is lacking in the Church from head to toe! How could Pius X be canonized after forty years? What did he do? As pope, he threw away the 1,500-year-old breviary order, worked his way into the Messbook to the limit of what was permitted, and on the other hand had the modernists monitored with a newly established secret service, that is, an average pontificate. What was the great thing about him? He did not go, he did not make atonement nights, no pilgrimages, no rosary parades, no prayer marathon events, no three-hour sermons, no fasting cures of the Spanish model (he became thicker and thicker). What was it?

    As chaplain, pastor, canon, regens, bishop, patriarch, pope, step by step on the ladder of responsibility, he never did anything other than his duty. Then one would have to canonize the faithful officials?

    The difference was the extent of Giuseppe Sarto's love. He not only did his duty, he tore himself apart with love for his own. He was given the grace to work in his lifetime some of the miracles announced in this gospel. As a pastor, he imitated the multiplication of bread in his granary, and as pope he healed blind-born people. At that time, this love was still a prerequisite in the Apostle days!
    Let us now look at the announcement of miracles. It is not necessarily necessary to take their name. Finally, Christ may also speak in parables as a Risen One (though noticeably shorter). "Talking in new languages" existed and will be, but the real meaning of the expression is convincing speech. Every person has his language, phrases, words, words, memories, ideas that are his own as an individual. We must not forget, at a time when fashion dictates clothing not only against any sense of shame, but also against all reason, so much so that today you can see women without a hat even in rain, hail and two degrees plus. But man, who is controlled by his soul and not by television, is all the more different from others than his soul is in control. A conformist saint? Madness! A conformist individual? Madness! The art of the apostle (from Paul to Lefebvre) now lies in convincing this individual, not a lot of idiots. He must be a Roman to the Romans, the Greeks a Greek. That was Pius X. Allen, that's what Lefebvre did in Africa. This is the real meaning of "speaking in languages," not the nonsense that the indemnified charismatics dream of.

    Drinking "snakes" and the "death-defying" is similarly understood. Isn't it talking about "touching a hot iron" today? Oh, how many priests want to avoid that. They turn on their monotonously sourpend ingessay and ladlladlladln twenty minutes about the Mother of God, who would have fallen asleep here on earth if the Blablah. Faced with a controversy, they cowardly flee into a – non-existent – majority that finds such a thing inappropriate. They may get their sheep, but they have no growth. Worse still, they rebuke the doubter and urge him to "not think, but to believe" (the main thing he donates!). These are priests who can be replaced by a tape recorder on the pulpit, no one would notice the difference. The real apostle touches the hot iron, he lifts up the serpent. The martyrs did it and Pius X did it with the modernists. Archbishop Lefebvre began his struggle in retirement!

    Similar to poison drinking. Whoever has faith AND LOVE cannot be put off by heresy. One can sometimes be confused, but one does not lose one of God's most precious gifts, namely the sensus catholicus, the sense in which one of the naturally given common sense says: "Stop, this is not Catholic." The basic condition for this state of affairs, however, is the perfect possible opening to the truth. Whoever reads his truths in any, usually stupid tables, or – God shall beware – in his selfishness, does not have this sense. Chesterton has already said that the humility is to reduce yourself to one point. The mathbook says that this is a thing without deflating. When you get there, a blade of grass seems just as amazing in creation as asequoia gigantea. Only the insatiable quest for perfect truth gives one the opportunity to overcome the poison of heresy. One must love the truth, more than oneself, AND IF THE HIRN IS IN IT, for Christ did not say, "I give you the truth," but "I am the truth."

    Today we also want to commemorate the holy martyr Pope Urbanus the First, the patron saint of winegrowers. We need its protection in a special way. He is the patron of the second matter of holy mass, so he is one of the pillars of the Mass. In the unfortunate, purely Protestant prohibition in the USA (1919-1933), the winegrowers were at least still allowed to produce wine for measuring and self-consumption. But next time? The risk of us losing wine is low, but is that true for all countries? Saint Urbanus is also symbolic of the Mass as such! Let us pray, let us pray IN TIME that a criminal EU does not classify them under the heading 'sects'.
    • Back• Overview

    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2355
    • Reputation: +1523/-91
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Gregory Hesse website
    « Reply #9 on: April 28, 2020, 10:35:03 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for the translations, Mr G!
    You are welcome, here is another:
    Fourth Sunday after Pentecost (6 July 2003) 
    The first thing that must be noticed by today's gospel is the beginning: "At that time the people urged themselves to Jesus to hear the word of God." The people are crowding for Jesus, not the Pharisees! These divinely inspired words reveal the falsehood of those who say, "Let the priests think, you must just follow and obey, do not break your head." What a hubris, what a mistake. If they, these believers, had followed their priests, they would all have been lost.

    Now, however, it is not only the case that we are not allowed to follow today's Pharisees, those bishops who place "the civilization of love and peace" in place of Christ's truth (John Paul II, 1.1.2001), but we are in a similar situation to the people of that time: we want to hear (I hope) the word of God and we often do not know where we can find it. The Pope does not give it to us, for his message is that of his inaugural encyclical, Redemptor Hominis (no. 10:2): "The astonishment at the value and dignity of man is called The Good News, Gospel. It is also called Christianism." The latter sentence was even censored in the official German translation, it was evident and even this translator, since Paul VI, too much of a hard subject. This message of John Paul II is pure and unashamed humanism in the worst variant, not humane, but godless.

    Let us not receive the word of God from the bishops, for there are at least five different worldviews in ten bishops, and as far as priests are concerned, the cloak of love is to be covered over their emptiness. Nothing is to be expected from there.

    So where do we find the Word of God? The twenty ecuмenical councils (among which the 1962-1965 is certainly not to be counted) give us the answer: 1. In the Scriptures, especially in the New Testament; 2. In the doctrine of the ecuмenical Councils; 3. In the teaching of the popes, provided that it is infallible or does not contradict tradition on any point.

    Does the last sentence burden us with the duty to study theology? May the answer be in the spirit of St. Thomas Aquinas: distinguendum est (one must distinguish):

    Of course, not all can study theology, where? Almost all universities are decomposed by heresy, and in the few circles where tradition has remained, there is virtually nothing that can approach a former university degree. Nevertheless, we have our teachers: the Holy Scriptures (I repeat myself), the encyclicals of the popes, which are available in German, and the priests who follow this only true tradition, whether that is the hw. Mr. Father Milch in his immortal sermons, or the priests of the work of Archbishop Lefebvre. In no case, however, can our minds retire:

    Those who love God must think about Him.

    "And He sat down, and taught the people from the ship."

    How refreshing these words must have been for a crowd that only ever heard the monotonous singing of Pharisees, whose most important teachings were their own holiness and the embarrassingly accurate observance of largely nonsensical Sabbath rules! Although the Pharisees and scribes were educated, their complacent, condescending, and superficial sermons must have conveyed little knowledge, for the blindness that comes from pride deprives any education of its benefit.

    Then Christ commands the fish to go into the net to Peter and others. The reaction of Peter, who was certainly not the most intelligent apostle, shows his great heart. In exemplary love and humility, he throws Himself at Christ's feet and cries out, "Lord, go away from me, I am a sinful man!" In view of the wonderful event, the instinctive thought of this humble fisherman is: "Oh Lord, I am not worthy...!" What a magnificent example of humility! How much this basic attitude is lacking for all those , especially in "our circles" – who seem to consider themselves worthy enough to receive miracles, visions and messages from heaven. How much this humility is lacking for those of us who had not been confessing for some time and yet are carefree after a memorably said domine era non sum dignus... approaching the greatest of all miracles, the Lord himself in the host!

    Like all miracles of Christ, this one is the illustration of another mystery: "... from now on you shall catch men."
    The meaning of this saying seems to have been lost for good in the twentieth century: as I know from passionate anglers, baiting is an art and, as I know from fishermen, net-throwing. You don't catch fish by scaring it or doing nothing. But that is the fault of today. The priests and the faithful have always driven out the fish through arrogance, lovelessness and stupidity, but it was not system! Although until the fifties a canonized father of the mission, Marcel Lefebvre, could still set true records of the mission, as Hans Jakob Stehle proves, Eastern politicsbegan as early as 1917. In the end, ecuмenism, which was raised to the goal in 1965, developed into the one already on March 19, 1930 (!!!), in which, sung in St. Peter's Basilica, the Filioque had fallen victim during the creed!
    Without love and without truth, one cannot fish as much as without a boat and without a net. Even if the net – the truth – is holey, nothing will be caught. This is precisely the doctrine of today's Gospel: Christ tells Simon: "... throw out your nets to catch." And although last night was unsuccessful, Simon replies, "In your words, I will throw out the net." Christ shows the future Apostles what a spectacular success they will have if they obey Him and do their duty. If the net had been holey now, they would not have caught anything, if the boat had not been kept tight, they would have sunk.

    In the past, the mission has often failed because it was loveless, now it is just a name, because actually the fish are told to stay at sea.

    We must also remember the nets and the boat: if we want to convert our Lutheran neighbor, we will not succeed if we confirm to him in a "hierarchy of truths" that he believes the most important thing anyway, even if we prophesy hell to him fiercely and from above. For human fishing for conversion, the boat is love and here above all prayer, patience, feeling, and the net is the uncompromising, complete truth. In prayer we implore the gift of God, faith, in patience we hear the questions AND the responses, with emotion we try to draw attention to eternity. As far as the truth is concerned, we must never give in anywhere, not give up Iota Unum, but produce something well: the Sanctifying Grace and its source, the sacraments.

    What else is missing?

    "And they... left everything and followed Him."