Consider the possibility, that is if you like most Traditionalists believe, the Church was infiltrated with Masons who had a very powerful AGENDA to fulfill.  He, Francis and his predecessors were never elected.
Read this CAREFULLY!
 

Someday very soon a very good priest as Fr. Chazal will see the truth of the term, sedevacantism.

Your the one who mentioned the words "The pope once elected."  So sad you ignore any comment about what the Church says concerning Simony not only refers to money but benefit; in this case benefit to the Freemasons, Modernists, Communism, Illuminati.

God bless you!

I didn't take you seriously, perhaps you might show me somewhere on the Internet where it alludes to the sedevacantism position in believing the Pope once elected is Divine.  You even capitalize the word Divine?

As a matter of fact, at least C.M.R.I. has a very large library with thousands of books prior to Vatican II, these books were left there when they took possession of the property.  Many are centuries old and tell the issues of bad popes with personal sins, antipopes.  Also is mentioned the solutions of the many antipopes.  We don't use new books published recently that double speak the teachings of the Church, nor books that exaggerate doctrine or stretch it so far it becomes heresy.  

The difference these sins were personal, not taught as a public way of life for the faithful to follow.  

Sedevacantism is only a word that describes what you yourself believe, the Chair of Peter empty, but the Chair is still there, the Papacy the Office is waiting for the resurrection of the Church.  

Sedevacantism does not teach even the past popes were Divine, nor was the Blessed Mother Divine, you should know that!

You are very mistaken Meg, and I realize you are only parroting what you hear from people who parrot from others.  

Everyone in the world, except Mary the White Lily of the Blessed Trinity, is a sinner!

Yes, if we had a true pope and the people think he isn't a pope, which many beliefs do believe that way, and yes it is quite ridiculous.  
What is more ridiculous is when people do believe he is a true pope but crucifix him with their own words, is what they will have to answer for before God.  

Disrespect and calling YOUR pope is not my idea of becoming holy, according to the Church and lives of the Saints.  

Since you know this truth you posted above you may find yourself guilty before God because you are responsible to obey and submit to the pope, the True popes throughout the history of the Church and when you recognize an infiltrator, Freemason, Communist, Modernist, Illuminatist as a True Pope your are not submitting to the past true Popes because these evil men contradict the true popes, you are therefore failing in your allegiance to the papacy.  Furthermore when you recognize that the Church has been infiltrated with the ilk of the above they according to the Church have no power.  In otherwords, we are not expected to submit to someone who is not the pope just because the world says he is.  We as Catholics are called to obey GOD RATHER THAN MAN.  

The church in the past has been without a pope for many years.  It is the papacy, the office that sedevacantist recognizes during these periods.  

************

Simony can be money, gift, profit or benefit etc.  
Fifth Lateran Council 1512-17 A.D.

SESSION 5
16 February 1513
[Bull renewing and confirming the Constitution against not committing the evil of simony when electing the Roman pontiff]

election of the Roman pontiff is made or effected by the person who is elected, or by one or several members of the college of cardinals, giving their votes in a manner that in any way involves simony being committed — by the gift, promise or receipt of money, goods of any sort, castles, offices, benefices, promises or obligations — by the person elected or by one or several other persons, in any manner or form whatsoever, even if the election resulted in a majority of two-thirds or in the unanimous choice of all the cardinals, or even in a spontaneous agreement on the part of all, without a scrutiny being made, then not only is this election or choice itself null, and does not bestow on the person elected or chosen in this fashion any right of either spiritual or temporal administration, but also there can be alleged and presented, against the person elected or chosen in this manner, by any one of the cardinals who has taken part in the election, the charge of simony, as a true and unquestionable heresy, so that the one elected is not regarded by anyone as the Roman pontiff.