Just thought some who are curious to see whats allowed by Rome, because that Conciliar priest has not been reprimanded, excommunicated, anything.

He'll never be reprimanded since it is not only allowed by Rome, the video you posted is actually an example of the new "mass" fully understood and implemented. I often wonder why all the new "masses" are not like this.

Fr. Wathen nailed it in 1971........
....Some may say, you are identifying the abuses with the "New Mass" itself. I am saying that the "New Mass" IS the abuse of the True Mass! I am saying that, with the jettisoning of both the law and the spirit of Quo Primum, by that very Act, the Pope has not only substituted something totally different from the Mass, but that it is of the very essence of the "New Mass" to permit every form of profanation, because the "New Mass" makes the good pleasure of the people its "liturgy."

Intrinsic to the very idea of the "New Mass" is that the people are more important than Christ the Savior, than His Sacrifice to His Heavenly Father, than the Church, His Bride. In the "New Religion" THE PEOPLE IS BAAL! Is it not they who must be entertained, accommodated, and emoted over?


I am constantly amazed that there are still people out there who identify themselves as "Traditional Catholics" and who've been to the True Mass yet fail to differentiate the True Mass from it's blasphemous mockery, the new "mass". Some would consider the video you posted as an extreme case - to which Fr. Wathen goes on......... Yes, I know some will say, "You are going too far. You are talking about the most extreme cases." No, that is where you err. I am talking about those places where the "New Liturgy" has been truly understood and fully implemented. Your mistake is that you are thinking of those places where the priests and people have as yet failed to do so.