Author Topic: For all sedevacantists and conclavists (Read 7832 times)

Caminus · « **Reply #10 on:** June 27, 2009, 01:23:52 PM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

Quote from: Caminus
Any opinion that theoretically forces one to separate oneself from other traditional catholics is an evil fruit of said opinion. When this opinion leads to condemnation of other traditional catholics or causes one to view other traditional catholics with suspicion and/or contempt, it is another evil fruit.

This is exactly what the SSPX et alii (and, in the final analysis, ALL trads of whatever stripe) do with regard to the Novus, and rightly so. So...?

What happens accidentally is not the same as that which happens formally and intentionally. To adhere to tradition it happens accidentally that a separation occurs from the normal diocesan structure. On the other hand, theoretical sedevacantists separate themselves intentionally, not from that which is evil, but that which is good, because of their private opinions.

roscoe · « **Reply #11 on:** June 27, 2009, 03:39:57 PM »

There is no such thing as a 'sede vacantist'.

roscoe · « **Reply #12 on:** June 27, 2009, 08:11:42 PM »

What is a conclavist?

Raoul76 · « **Reply #13 on:** June 27, 2009, 08:59:51 PM »

I am a sedevacantist, roscoe.

What are you? If you are not a sedevacantist, please lead me in the direction of your Pope. Because Siri is dead.

roscoe · « **Reply #14 on:** June 27, 2009, 09:09:47 PM »

Just because I don't know who the Pope is does not mean that there isn't one.

So you believe That Greg XVII was the Pope until 1989?

btw the trick you pulled attempting to create the impression that I 'worship' John Lennon or that I 'hate' Moors was a pretty low blow.