Do you think this event is associated with evil?
That's a difficult question...But a worthwhile question I may add.
re: bacelets: It just doesn't sit right with Trad philosophy,
AI: SPLC
"...Bishop Richard Williamson (a traditional.. ....Catholic bishop) frequently used his Eleison Comments newsletter to promote end-times and "nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr" conspiracy theories. He often speculated that a global,
cashless society serves as a precursor to the "Mark of the Beast," framing digital finance and government surveillance as mechanisms for an antichrist system designed to control human commerce
https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/fr-salenave-st-thomas-aquinas-talk/msg1029369/#msg1029369"... And Bishop Williamson was not only as simple as a dove, he was also as wise as a serpent and did not restrict himself to doctrinal letters about the Faith, but also explained world events and how the evil one was destroying the social bonds that make peoples and nations. Bishops de Mallerias, de Galarreta, and Fellay did not do these things..."
*****************
So, two traitor bishops will be consecrating 4 new bishops: that is a big problem from the getgo. "bishop V. Huonder set the stage, and pure logic points to the recruiting of a couple more N.O. "bishops", so no state of necessity. There is an undercurrent that is bewildering...NeoSSPX needs to return to 2006 General Chapter " 6 Conditions", so I pray that they would fight the enemy, the EVIL one.
Pray.
I was excited when this was announced Feb. 2, but now I even wonder why some "Resistance" priests are so hopeful... Immediate solution is to wait and see. Perhaps WWIII will delete everything.
Topic: Five new bishops for the SSPX? (Read 12366 times)