Author Topic: Five new bishops for the SSPX? (Read 6094 times)

Twice dyed · « **Reply #35 on:** **Yesterday** at 09:18:09 AM »

https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/culture_society/priestly-fraternity-st-pius-x-switzerland/
Excerpt:
"...Rome, after initially refusing their request, has issued a warning of excommunication should they proceed, saying this action will lead to a ‘perfect schism’. This, however, is not true, since for such a schism to occur, there must be a clear intention to engage in a schismatic act and to create, alongside the new bishops, a hierarchical jurisdiction that runs parallel to that of the Roman Catholic Church, similar to the present-day Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association (CCPA) established by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 1957.

The eye-opener is that the Vatican recognizes the appointments of CCPA bishops by General Secretary of the CCP, Xi Jinping, and, at his behest, the creation of new dioceses in China. All things being equal, unlike other ‘traditional’ groups within the Church, the Fraternity of St. Pius X takes a public, yet respectful, stand against the doctrinal errors that presently ravage the Church and society.

One might assume that this matter is solely an internal concern of the Catholic Church. However, it is essential to consider the historical significance of the Church’s crucial influence on the development of Western society, which today, due to its lackadaisical stance towards Christianity, has resulted in a societal disintegration. While the Fraternity may not represent the last stronghold of Christendom, it undeniably serves as a bulwark for Christianity within society.

OABrownson1876 · « **Reply #36 on:** **Yesterday** at 10:58:20 AM »

Assuming that there are 600 G traditional Catholic SSPX faithful, four bishops are not enough. I remember Bishop Williamson would fly from Rochester, WI to Australia for confirmations. That is insane. He dreaded that flight; I think it was 22 hrs.

The SSPX should issue a directive, "We will have absolutely no communications with Rome until Rome returns to the Faith and the valid sacraments."

Considering the amount of distance that these bishops will be travelling, I say they need at least 2 bishops in North America, at least 2 in Europe, 1 in South America, 1 in the Philippines, 1 in Australia, at least 1 in Russia (if Russia has an SSPX Mass). We are already at 7-10 bishops.

TomGubbinsKimmage · « **Reply #37 on:** **Yesterday** at 12:07:39 PM »

The resistance has seven bishops. Sspx faithful and priests can just avail of ours

Twice dyed · « **Reply #38 on:** **Yesterday** at 03:16:28 PM »

Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Yesterday at 12:07:39 PM

The resistance has seven bishops. Sspx faithful and priests can just avail of ours

Good point TGK. What is their reasoning for refusing to use Resistance, valid bishops? Faithful can use any bishop in the present "State of Emergency", aka Supplied jurisdiction. But SSPX doesn't tolerate our 6-7 bishops. Why?
Therefore Rome could accuse the SSPX of lying, because the SSPX is putting forward that there are not enough bishops for the sacraments. Their argument doesn't hold water. All our bishops recognize the Pope.

In Vigano's situation, that exco status is difficult to iron out.

CNN.news

Sea!!?? Even the boat is snickering...

Incredulous · « **Reply #39 on:** **Today** at 04:48:45 PM »

Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Yesterday at 12:07:39 PM

The resistance has seven bishops. Sspx faithful and priests can just avail of ours

Faure, Thomas and Zendejas were docuмented Consecrations but what proof that Vigano and the others were consecrated?

Vigano won't admit it publicly so it amounts to an amalgamation of "ghost Bishop's" in a surreal "crypto-Resistance".

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Five new bishops for the SSPX? (Read 6094 times)

Twice dyed

Consecrations 2026, SSPX bad ? but K0mmunis+s approved by Pope Leo XIV ?

OABrownson1876

Re: Five new bishops for the SSPX?

TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Five new bishops for the SSPX?

Twice dyed

Re: Five new bishops for the SSPX?

Incredulous

Re: Five new bishops for the SSPX?