Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Five new bishops for the SSPX?  (Read 1543 times)

1 Member and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: Five new bishops for the SSPX?
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2026, 09:34:23 PM »
They should consecrate the best parish priests, who are still actively parish priests.
Yes, the older priests have a ton of contacts and pure experience. Remember +Faure, around the time he was consecrated, some were reminding +W about the new Code and the age of bishops, for mandatory retirement. + Faure wrote something to the effect that : 'The N.Ordo church just wants to remove experienced knowledgeable bishops. Traditional Church didn't act that way because the older bishops had treasures of wisdom etc.'

*****************

Another opinion:
https://www.facebook.com/100001345673649/posts/from-la-nuova-bussola-quotidianaaccording-to-our-sources-five-priests-will-be-or/25595022996792538/
Feb 4, 2026 Italian News Outlet.

From La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana:
"According to our sources, five priests will be ordained as bishops by Bishop Bernard Fellay and Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta on 1 July, one more than the bishops ordained by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre on 30 June 1988."

LNBQ is opposed to the step, but in any case, the information and links herein are valuable.




Re: Five new bishops for the SSPX?
« Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 01:14:41 AM »
I have been told by an SSPX priest that they will consecrate 4 bishops, under the ages of 45


Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: Five new bishops for the SSPX?
« Reply #17 on: Yesterday at 11:13:33 AM »
https://infovaticana.com/en/2026/03/25/in-econe-and-from-on-high-the-fsspx-announces-the-agenda-of-the-consecrations-while-leo-xiv-insists-on-ignoring-them/
Excerpt:
"...given the volume of faithful expected to attend this summons.

   The decision to advance on this calendar continues without signs of institutional dialogue with a Rome that has opted for snubs and silence, a dynamic that has characterized the first year of Pope Leo XIV’s pontificate. Problems? What problems! Between embracing babies and calling for the prohibition of aerial bombings (we don’t know if land and naval ones are more legitimate), the Pope shows a special tendency to turn his back on what is contingent, perhaps in the naive hope that everything will resolve itself. 

   There is no record, for now, of any approach or formal reception on the part of Pope Leo XIV, while recent contacts have been limited to second-level interlocutions that, far from reducing tension, have introduced new elements of friction. The public accusation of schism directed against the Fraternity by Prefect Víctor Manuel Fernández has not been accompanied by concrete canonical development, leaving the qualification on a more rhetorical plane with little legal basis from the author of the infamous docuмent Mater Populi Fidelis.

   In this scenario, the FSSPX consolidates a de facto position: its own structure,..."



Re: Five new bishops for the SSPX?
« Reply #18 on: Yesterday at 01:30:39 PM »
With the US/Israel war against Iran escalating, I doubt many will be attending these ordinations come July.