Author Topic: Fisher More College banned by bishop from saying Latin Mass (Read 12393 times)

claudel · « **Reply #25 on:** March 04, 2014, 04:34:09 PM »

Quote from: Thurifer

Dr. Dudley's lecture has been removed.

I found it here. I recommend it to all. It's an excellent piece of work: closely argued, carefully reasoned and sourced, analytic, dispassionate—not at all the sort of intemperate and extreme outburst that the sanctimonious fraud Taylor Marshall claims it is.

The passage that has the Newchurchers and the mushy-soft pseudotrads up in arms may be found on page 11. Happy reading.

Matto · « **Reply #26 on:** March 04, 2014, 04:39:24 PM »

I didn't read the entire PDF yet, but I read the offensive part of it. I like it so far and since now it has been noticed by a wide audience, I expect Dr. Dudley to be fired.

Geremia · « **Reply #27 on:** March 04, 2014, 05:01:08 PM »

Quote from: Matto

I didn't read the entire PDF yet, but I read the offensive part of it. I like it so far and since now it has been noticed by a wide audience, I expect Dr. Dudley to be fired.

I hope not. Also, all those who disagree with Dr. Dudley have already been fired or quit.

Meg · « **Reply #28 on:** March 04, 2014, 08:35:53 PM »

The lecture by Dr. Dudley is excellent, and it's worth taking the time to read it. I hadn't really understood the emphasis from the pulpit at the NO parishes on peace and luv, without any mention of sin (except for the sin of not being charitable) before reading this. It makes more sense now.

He makes a good case for chucking the Council altogether. I can see why a typical diocesan bishop might have a problem with this, if the bishop has read this.

Dr. Dudley explains his position very well in an articulate but easy to understand manner.

Geremia · « **Reply #29 on:** March 04, 2014, 11:09:35 PM »

Quote from: Meg

The lecture by Dr. Dudley is excellent, and it's worth taking the time to read it. I hadn't really understood the emphasis from the pulpit at the NO parishes on peace and luv, without any mention of sin (except for the sin of not being charitable) before reading this. It makes more sense now.

He makes a good case for chucking the Council altogether. I can see why a typical diocesan bishop might have a problem with this, if the bishop has read this.

Dr. Dudley explains his position very well in an articulate but easy to understand manner.

Yes, it was a good lecture.