Author Topic: Fisheaters trashy posts. (Read 31916 times)

roscoe · « **Reply #330 on:** September 03, 2010, 12:24:22 AM »

OK-- what I am asking is--- if U have time-- pls give us your evaluation of the general effectiveness of the drug laws in USA? Do U support they way things are now?

Roman Catholic · « **Reply #331 on:** September 03, 2010, 02:17:00 AM »

Quote from: roscoe

OK-- what I am asking is--- if U have time-- pls give us your evaluation of the general effectiveness of the drug laws in USA? Do U support they way things are now?

What do you mean exactly?

You want me to make generalized and sweeping statements evaluating the "general effectiveness" and "way things are now"?

What do you mean exactly?

About everywhere in USA or just in some or most parts?

Can generalized comments be made concerning everywhere?

Federal or state legislations?

Against traffickers, users, dealers, or heavy users, aiders and abettors?

What contitutes heavy or light use?

"Soft" or "hard" drugs? -- What contitutes hard or soft drugs?

Effective in what ways? -- Punishment, deterrence, rehabilitation?

There are many more aspects and considerations too.

It is more complicated than your question implies.

And even if we cleared up all your imprecisions, I would not have time to do all the research required and then write a valid evaluation.

Sorry mate.

roscoe · « **Reply #332 on:** September 03, 2010, 12:06:30 PM »

If someone will proclaim that they are following the attempted dialogue between RC and moi, I will continue to debate him. If not then I will give up.

Roman Catholic · « **Reply #333 on:** September 03, 2010, 11:33:39 PM »

Good idea Rosco.

Perhaps you are getting the hint, that I am not prepared to run off on another fruitless discussion with you, especially while you will not deal with some outstanding business.

You see, you still have not explained something that a few of us have asked you about many times...

We are still waiting for you to explain exactly what we have written that causes you to label us as Jansenists or Jansenistic.

Please explain, if you can.

How exactly does opposition to your pet ideas (that have nothing to do with Catholicism) constitute heresy --- namely Jansenism?

When we use our free will to disagree with you, how is that a denial of free will, and smacking of heresy?

You see, you can't just go araond calling people heretics without supporting your charges, and then expect them all to continue wasting time on you.

Some will in a limited fashion, but don't expect any willingness to fully engage with you.

I hope you understand.

scipio_a · « **Reply #334 on:** September 04, 2010, 02:20:11 AM »

Quote from: roscoe

If someone will proclaim that they are following the attempted dialogue between RC and moi, I will continue to debate him. If not then I will give up.

I was not reading it, but I was getting a kick out of someone getting all up in arms about the notion that folks should be allowed to smoke some weed. I mean really, who cares? Legalize....legalize....get the feds out of it.

Roman Catholic · « **Reply #335 on:** September 04, 2010, 02:28:24 AM »

Quote from: scipio_a

I was not reading it, but I was getting a kick out of someone getting all up in arms about the notion that folks should be allowed to smoke some weed.

quote]

Did someone get all up in arms about the notion that folks should be allowed to smoke some weed?

BTW, Roscoe does not lke people referring to the sacramental as "weed" -- you need to speak much more reverently about it, or he may call you a Jansenist.

Roman Catholic · « **Reply #336 on:** September 04, 2010, 04:44:13 AM »

Quote from: roscoe

If ............ I will continue to debate him.

We were not really having a debate anyway.

scipio_a · « **Reply #337 on:** September 04, 2010, 04:45:26 AM »

Quote from: Roman Catholic

Quote from: scipio_a

...or he may call you a Jansenist.

That would be a new label I cloud add to my sig line.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #338 on:** September 04, 2010, 12:52:21 PM »

Why does roscoe think weed is sacramental?

roscoe · « **Reply #339 on:** September 04, 2010, 12:59:58 PM »

Quote from: Roman Catholic

Quote from: roscoe
If ............ I will continue to debate him.

We were not really having a debate anyway.

It is kind of hard to debate someone who can't decide if S rev around E or E rev around S.

Hey SS-- why do U believe RC when says I think weed is sacramental? Can't U read my posts for yourself? I have never said anything even close to that. BTW-- I smoke grass-- not weed.

SS --aren't U the one who actually takes Classicom seriously?

roscoe · « **Reply #340 on:** September 04, 2010, 06:45:25 PM »

Quote from: clare

Quote from: roscoe
Quote from: clare
Quote from: Roman Catholic
The resident :smoke-pot:-head categorizes early Beatles music as classical music, not rock. :rolleyes:

Well, that's a heresy for a start. Early Beatles stuff is an untidy din! Ban him, I say!

What does 'untidy din' mean?

Untidy means messy, and din means noise. It was the best description I could think of.

I prefer a more polished sound.

While My Guitar Gently Weeps is quite nice. She Loves You and Love Me Do are a bit of a din.

IMHO!

btw Clare i am of the op that the disturbing, screeching 'untidy din' heard in WMGGW was put there on purpose as some sort of subliminal program.

The only stereo version of the classic SLU is found on the American CD remasters-- not the current 09 releases.

Roman Catholic · « **Reply #341 on:** September 04, 2010, 07:52:02 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

It is kind of hard to debate someone who can't decide if S rev around E or E rev around S.

Rosco, none of us decide if the Earth revolves around the Sun or vice versa.

God decided it long ago.

The subject is not included in the list of what Catholics must know to be saved.

I never told you if am pro-geocentrism, pro-heliocentrism, or other.

Please don't do your usual accusation act and begin to accuse people who have no opinion, or an opinion that differs from yours on the subject, of being Jansenists or of being any other type of heretics.

Have a good:smoke-pot:weekend.

roscoe · « **Reply #342 on:** September 04, 2010, 08:22:49 PM »

Quote from: Roman Catholic

Quote from: roscoe

It is kind of hard to debate someone who can't decide if S rev around E or E rev around S.

Rosco, none of us decide if the Earth revolves around the Sun or vice versa.

I have decided that the scientific evidence proves that E rev around S.

Caraffa · « **Reply #343 on:** September 05, 2010, 09:41:16 PM »

Quote from: scipio @FE

Show them that you do not have to change your life to be a trad, you don't have stop doing the things you love to do

Well this remark is actually pretty close to Lutheranism, Calvinism, and the position of certain modern day Anabaptists. The one thing it is not, is Catholic.

Quote from: scipio

since people have needs and sometimes give in to temptation

So some people's "felt needs" are more important than God's law? Therapeutic Deism anyone? A low view of sin?

scipio_a · « **Reply #344 on:** September 05, 2010, 11:03:48 PM »

That arguement is at FE, your concerns were already addressed in the OP.

But if you want to discuss or argue it...kept Candyland at FE...someone might get back to you.

I encourge you top post to Candyland...