Author Topic: Fisheaters trashy posts. (Read 35352 times)

roscoe · « **Reply #330 on:** September 03, 2010, 12:24:22 AM »

OK-- what I am asking is--- if U have time-- pls give us your evaluation of the general effectiveness of the drug laws in USA? Do U support they way things are now?

Roman Catholic · « **Reply #331 on:** September 03, 2010, 02:17:00 AM »

Quote from: roscoe

OK-- what I am asking is--- if U have time-- pls give us your evaluation of the general effectiveness of the drug laws in USA? Do U support they way things are now?

What do you mean exactly?

You want me to make generalized and sweeping statements evaluating the "general effectiveness" and "way things are now"?

What do you mean exactly?

About everywhere in USA or just in some or most parts?

Can generalized comments be made concerning everywhere?

Federal or state legislations?

Against traffickers, users, dealers, or heavy users, aiders and abettors?

What contitutes heavy or light use?

"Soft" or "hard" drugs? -- What contitutes hard or soft drugs?

Effective in what ways? -- Punishment, deterrence, rehabilitation?

There are many more aspects and considerations too.

It is more complicated than your question implies.

And even if we cleared up all your imprecisions, I would not have time to do all the research required and then write a valid evaluation.

Sorry mate.

roscoe · « **Reply #332 on:** September 03, 2010, 12:06:30 PM »

If someone will proclaim that they are following the attempted dialogue between RC and moi, I will continue to debate him. If not then I will give up.

Roman Catholic · « **Reply #333 on:** September 03, 2010, 11:33:39 PM »

Good idea Rosco.

Perhaps you are getting the hint, that I am not prepared to run off on another fruitless discussion with you, especially while you will not deal with some outstanding business.

You see, you still have not explained something that a few of us have asked you about many times...

We are still waiting for you to explain exactly what we have written that causes you to label us as Jansenists or Jansenistic.

Please explain, if you can.

How exactly does opposition to your pet ideas (that have nothing to do with Catholicism) constitute heresy --- namely Jansenism?

When we use our free will to disagree with you, how is that a denial of free will, and smacking of heresy?

You see, you can't just go araond calling people heretics without supporting your charges, and then expect them all to continue wasting time on you.

Some will in a limited fashion, but don't expect any willingness to fully engage with you.

I hope you understand.

scipio_a · « **Reply #334 on:** September 04, 2010, 02:20:11 AM »

Quote from: roscoe

If someone will proclaim that they are following the attempted dialogue between RC and moi, I will continue to debate him. If not then I will give up.

I was not reading it, but I was getting a kick out of someone getting all up in arms about the notion that folks should be allowed to smoke some weed. I mean really, who cares? Legalize....legalize....get the feds out of it.