http://www.christorchaos.com/PleaseHelpBishopFellayFindHisHermeneuticOfContinuityPartTwo.htm

Old news to some, I know.  But interesting nonetheless:

Bishop Bernard Fellay, the Superior General of the Society of Saint Pius X, has engendered a good deal of controversy with those who exercise strong influence over almost all things conciliar, that is, adherents of the тαℓмυd, whom he termed "enemies of the Church" in his meandering talk on December 28, 2012, the Feast of the Holy Innocents, in Toronto, Canada:

    And the same with the Church!  It’s OUR Church!  It’s sick, we pray for it, we do what we can.  We try not to be burned, once again.  So we take our.. our.. our.. precautions.  We must – there’s no other way. Now, when will the time come?  This is very difficult to answer.  I frankly, personally, I don’t think that this is possible until the head is in our favor.  Because the fight is too, too heavy.  And the head, that means the Pope, must be absolutely convinced of the necessity of Tradition.  The fight might continue in the Church, but as long as we don’t have that, I don’t see really any concrete, serious possibility to go ahead, because it’s too dangerous, too dangerous.  We have many enemies, many enemies.  But look and that’s very interesting.  Who, during that time, was the most opposed that the Church would recognize the Society?  The ENEMIES of the Church.  The Jєωs, the Masons, the [Modernists]!  The most opposed that the Society would be recognized as a Catholic:  the ENEMIES of the Church!  Interesting, isn’t it?  More than that, what was the point?

    What did they say to Rome?  They said, “You must oblige these people to accept Vatican II.  That’s also VERY interesting, isn’t it?  People whom [sic] from OUTSIDE the Church, who were clearly during centuries, were enemies of the Church, say to Rome, if you want  to accept these people, you MUST oblige them to accept the Council.  Isn’t that interesting?  Oh, it is!  I think it’s FANTASTIC!  Because it shows that Vatican II is THEIR THING!  Not the Church’s – THEY see, the ENEMIES of the Church see THEIR benefit in the Council.  Very interesting!  And so, I may say that’s the kind of argument we’re going to use with Rome.  Trying to make them reflect.. trying to make them reflect. (Transcript of Bishop Fellay's Meandering Musings, December 28, 2012.)

     

These comments are perfectly accurate.

They are accurate theologically.

They are accurate historically.

They are a precise and a most accurate account explaining who has been most opposed to the Society of Saint Pius X's "regularization" as a full member within the counterfeit church of conciliarism.

Had such a "regularization" taken place--and Bishop Fellay still held out some hope in this December 28, 2012, that it such a "regularization" can still take place, the Society of Saint Pius X would have been placed aside such communities as the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter, the Apostolic Administration of Saint John Mary Vianney of Campos, Brazil, the Institute of the Good Shepherd and, among others, the Institute of Christ the King, Sovereign Priests, each of which is permitted to offer or stage (as the case may be) the ever-modernizing version of the Immemorial Mass of Tradition (termed the "Extraordinary Form" in the lexicon of the conciliar revolutionaries) in exchange for silence about the sacrileges, apostasies and blasphemies perpetrated by the conciliar revolution. Adherents of the тαℓмυd hate the Society of Saint Pius X precisely because its leaders quite indeed represent what they hate and what they have sought to eradicate: the immutable teaching of the Catholic Church concerning the Social Reign of Christ the King and of the necessity to seek with urgency the conversion of al non-Catholics to true Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order.

Yes, тαℓмυdists have worked overtime to oppose all efforts on the part of the conciliar revolutionaries to "regularize" the Society of Saint X and have expressed concerns over the formulation of Good Friday Prayer for the Jєωs (see Bishop Donald Sanborn's Genuflecting to the Jєωs). Howls of protest were let loose four years ago following what Bishop Richard Richard Williamson has more or less admitted publicly were efforts on his part to speak the truth in his interview with Swedish television that just happened to air on Wednesday, January 21, 2012, three days before the official announcement from the Occupy Vatican Movement that the "excommunications" imposed against the four priests (Richard Williamson, Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Alfonse de Galaretta) who were consecrated by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and co-consecrated by Bishop Antonio de Castro Mayer in Econe, Switzerland, on June 30, 1988 (see (see Those Who Deny The h0Ɩ0cαųst, Disciples of Caiphas, Under The Bus, Nothing New Under the Conciliar Sun, Story Time in Econe, Yes, Sir, Master Scribe and No Crime Is Worse Than Deicide).

There is no need to beat a dead horse on this matter.

There is no need to quote what has been cited on this site in numerous articles concerning the conciliar belief that the Mosaic Covenant is still in force and that it has never been revoked (see Propagating Only What His Boss Believes and Teaches, part one, Propagating Only What His Boss Believes and Teaches, part two, On The Terms Of The Enemies Of Christ The King, Saint Peter and Anti-Peter, For Fear of the Jєωs and, among so many others, To Be Loved by the Jєωs).

Perhaps just this one reminder will suffice to explain that the only kind of Catholicism that is considered "acceptable" to the тαℓмυdists" is the conciliar corruption of It

It is not, of course, to be "anti-Semitic" to oppose the enemies of Christ the King and the immutable truths contained in His Sacred Deposit of Faith. It is our duty to be opposed to Judaism and to be opposed to all false religions precisely because we have true charity for the souls of those steeped in those false religions, those who, of course, are not on the path to eternal salvation and who serve as instruments of fomenting the kind of social disorder that the good God uses to chastise us for our own infidelities and lukewarmness (see Chopped Liver No More and Chopped Liver No More Update).

Quite in contrast to Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI's constant references to the crimes committed by agents of Adolf Hitler's Third Reich against adherents of the тαℓмυd that he uses to justify a new "definition" of what he thinks is the Catholic Church's "relationship with the faith of Israel," Father Denis Fahey provided us with a cogent piece of Catholic truth about how the term "anti-Semitism" is used by many adherents of the тαℓмυd to fill Catholics with guilt and to keep them on the "conciliar reservation" that they have so generously staked out for them:

    The term “anti-semitism,” with all its war connotation of nαzι cruelty, is now having its comprehension widened to include every form of opposition to the Jєωιѕн nation’s naturalistic programme. Forgetfulness of the disorder of Jєωιѕн naturalism is keeping Catholics blind to the consequences of accepting the term with its Jєωιѕн comprehension. According to the leaders of the Jєωιѕн nation, to stand for the rights of Christ the King is to be an αnтι-ѕємιтє. (Father Denis Fahey, The Kingship of Christ and the Conversion of the Jєωιѕн Nation.)

 

There is an irony in all of this, my good and disappearing readers, in that Bishop Fellay is now in trouble for having antagonized the conciliar church's "elder brothers" and minders, something that he has gone to great lengths to castigate Bishop Richard Williamson for having done. Yes, I think that it is very necessary to help Bishop Fellay find his own "hermeneutic of continuity."

Although many examples, which you can find in the articles written in early 2009 after Bishop Williamson's interview was aired on Swedish television, could be provided of Bishop Fellay's public criticism of Bishop Williamson's comments about the events of World War II and of the conciliar teaching on the Jєωs and Judaism, it is sufficient for present purposes to simply remind you that Bishop Fellay is suffering at the present moment for doing precisely what he excoriated Bishop Williamson of doing in "happier times" in his relationship with the conciliar authorities: antagonize the Jєωs for speaking the truth in charity about them. Somewhere out there, yes, beneath the pale blue sky, Bishop Williamson must be enjoying himself.

What is truly said about this, of course, is the fact that Bishop Fellay still believes there is "hope" for the "regularization" of the Society of Saint Pius X by the lords of conciliarism even though his own meandering talk gives ample proof that the conciliar religion is false and is just as hideous and repugnant to the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, as the тαℓмυdic brand of Judaism and all other false religions.

The Catholic Church cannot give us error, ambiguity or confusion. That point has been made many times on this site, including in yesterday's article.

The Catholic Church cannot give us liturgies that are incentives to impiety. Once again, good readers, let me provide you with the teaching of the Council of Trent on this point:

 

         

    CANON VII.--If any one saith, that the ceremonies, vestments, and outward signs, which the Catholic Church makes use of in the celebration of masses, are incentives to impiety, rather than offices of piety; let him be anathema. (Session Twenty-Two, Chapter IX, Canon VII, Council of Trent, September 17, 1562, CT022.)

There is really no need go on, is there? Those who don't want to be convinced that there is no need for there to be any "super-magisterium" to "convert" a true pope to the perennial truths of the Holy Faith won't believe any amount of evidence that is placed before them that the following explanation of our ecclesiastical situation is the correct one:

    A legitimate pope cannot contradict or deny what was first taught by Christ to His Church. An essential change in belief constitutes the establishment of a new religion.

    The attribute of infallibility was given to the popes in order that the revealed doctrines and teaching of Christ would remain forever intact and unchanged. It is contrary to faith and reason to blindly follow an alleged pope who attempts to destroy the Catholic Faith--for there have been 41 docuмented antipopes. Papal infallibility means that the Holy Ghost guides and preserves the Catholic Church from error through the succession of legitimate popes who have ruled the Church through the centuries. All Catholics, including Christ's Vicar on earth, the pope, must accept all the doctrinal pronouncements of past popes. These infallible teachings form a vital link between Christ and St. Peter and his successors.

    If a pope did not accept and believe this entire body of formulated teachings (the Deposit of Faith), he could not himself be a Catholic. He would cease to belong to Christ's Church. If he no longer belongs to the Catholic Church, he cannot be her Head. (Fathers Francisco and Dominic Radecki, CMRI, Tumultuous Times, p. 274.)

    "Do not be misled by various and passing doctrines. In the Catholic Church Herself we must be careful to hold what has been believed everywhere, always and by all; for that alone is truly and properly Catholic." (Saint Vincent of Lerins, quoted in Tumultuous Times by Frs. Francisco and Dominic Radecki, CMRI, p. 279.)

     

Perhaps the bishops and priests of both of the Society of Saint Pius X and of the Society of Saint Pius X of the Strict Observance will come to recognize that a conciliar "cardinal" got it entirely correct eight years ago when he said the following:

 

    It is true that the canonical doctrine states that the see would be vacant in the case of heresy. ... But in regard to all else, I think what is applicable is what judgment regulates human acts. And the act of will, namely a resignation or capacity to govern or not govern, is a human act. (Cardinal Says Pope Could Govern Even If Unable to Speak, Zenit, February 8, 2005.)

How do we know what is heresy? The supposed "unknowability" of heresy has been denounced by the Catholic Church (see an appendix in yesterday's article of Mr. Michael Creighton's superb summary of this point)

Well, if you don't know by now, perhaps you can review the late Mr. Jerry Meng's Heresy: What Is It? and to review, if you have not done so already, Gregorius's The Chair is Still Empty.

Saint Paul the Apostle prophesied on these times as follows:

    [6] And now you know what withholdeth, that he may be revealed in his time. [7] For the mystery of iniquity already worketh; only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way. [8] And then that wicked one shall be revealed whom the Lord Jesus shall kill with the spirit of his mouth; and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming, him, [9] Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders, [10] And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying:

    [11] That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity. [12] But we ought to give thanks to God always for you, brethren, beloved of God, for that God hath chosen you firstfruits unto salvation, in sanctification of the spirit, and faith of the truth: [13] Whereunto also he hath called you by our gospel, unto the purchasing of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. [14] Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle. [15] Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God and our Father, who hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation, and good hope in grace, [16] Exhort your hearts, and confirm you in every good work and word. (2 Thessalonians, 2: 6-12.)

 

The Catholic Church simply cannot be an agent of any kind of "operation of error."

True Popes Never Need to Convert to the Faith.

Got it? Good.

In the midst of this "operation of error" that abounds in the midst of the counterfeit church of conciliarism (could anyone imagine the necessity of the bishops under Pope Saint Pius X arguing with him on the prohibition against the taking of innocent human life in the womb in any circuмstance at any time?), we need to ask Our Lady to help us remain with our true bishops and true priests who make no concessions to conciliarism. Any shepherd who does not warn his faithful to stay completely and totally away from the conciliar wolves is exposing them to the deceits of the devil represented by likes of Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI and his henchmen, among whom are Rino Fisichella and Federico Lombardi.

The tree of conciliarism is indeed rotten from its very top to its very poisonous roots

Our Lady's Immaculate Heart will indeed triumph in the end. May we persevere in our praying of as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit so that we, unworthy though we may be, might be able to plant a few seeds for the day when Catholics can say "so long" to the conciliar revolutionaries and their perverse liturgies and their corrupt doctrinal and their false moral teachings and "hello" to true popes and true bishops who are defenders of the entirety of the Catholic Faith, including the Social Reign of Christ the King.