No, the quasi-heretical R&R falsely appropriate Archbishop Lefebvre to their side. Archbishop Lefebvre agreed that it's not possible that a legitimate pope could do these things because he would be protected and guided by the Holy Spirit. He simply fell short of openly declaring it out of deference to the Church's authority. There are many citations and a long audio recording of the Archbishop saying these things. Fr. Ringose posted the audio when he became sedevacantist.
Do you agree with the Archbishop that a legitimate pope cannot pepetrate this degree of destruction because he's protected by the Holy Spirit?
As expected, you did not answer the question again so I will go through the motions and ask it again.... +ABL spelled it out nicely, what exactly do you disagree with?
I do not expect you to answer, I am merely pointing out to you the bs R&R deal with by having pertinent questions that challenge sedeism, consistently, completely and conveniently for sedes, ignored - which must be due to that intellectual pride thing DL mentioned.
Whether +ABL said that or not I do not know, nor does it matter who, if anyone, ever said it - no, I do not agree with it and I base my disagreement with that idea on V1's dogmatic teaching, I do not base it on my opinion or anyone else's opinion. (See, it's easy to give a clear answer to a clear question - just fyi).