None of the theologians you mentioned was even beginning to theorize about a situation like the one we have faced these last several decades.
They didn't quite see this particular crazy Crisis, but they still debated about how to deal with a heretical pope. Here's a paragraph from the last chapter of Fr. Chazal's book, "Contra Cekadam":
Quote: "Let us leave the last word to Catejan: "If somebody for a reasonable motive holds as suspect the person of the Pope, and refuse his presence, even his jurisdiction, he does not commit any delict of schism, nor any other delict as long as long as he is ready to accept the Pope if he were not suspect. It is obvious that we have the right to avoid what is causing damage and to prevent dangers." Catejan does not say that one has to refuse the jurisdiction of the suspect Pontiff, as you contend, but that someone could, with good reasons. He differed with Bellarmine on the question of the heretical Pope, but understood, almost prophetically, what could happen in our sorrowful years." (end quote)