Anymore to me, it is more amusing than anything I think - like DL saying R&R is a contradiction is amazing.
NOers and Sedes believe the Church teaches popes are divinely protected so they cannot do harm to the Church, and that popes are always automatically infallibly safe to follow - this they believe is what the Church teaches, or actually, is what they only say they believe the Church teaches - I do not believe any sede really believes it.
Instead of them realizing this is NOT what the Church teaches, they determine that popes are not popes based on this heretical teaching.
But if it was what the Church teaches, then the conciliar popes and the NO and all the other crap of V2 is infallibly safe to follow - this must be. The reason this must be is because so says the Church, whoever disagrees needs to argue with the Church, let her know that she teaches error ----something the sedes say is impossible while their postings reveal that they do not really believe it themselves. Talk about a contradiction, this one's the mother of them all.
As if that's not enough, the conciliar popes themselves actually, really and truly believe they are always infallibly safe to follow and are divinely protected from doing harm to the Church, just like the sedes - which is why the conciliar popes are eccuмaniacs, doing whatever they can to grant salvation to literally everyone - the more the better. And why wouldn't they since they believe that whatever they do, they're always automatically infallibly safe to follow?
Topic: Feb 2nd 2022, The Day RnR Admit Antipope Francis is Not in the Church? (Read 15568 times)