Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Feb 2nd 2022, The Day RnR Admit Antipope Francis is Not in the Church?  (Read 15512 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Feb 2nd 2022, The Day RnR Admit Antipope Francis is Not in the Church?
« Reply #100 on: February 07, 2022, 07:16:00 PM »
Chapter 12 of Daniel:  The Sacrifice of the Mass will come to an end.  We are nearly there.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Re: Feb 2nd 2022, The Day RnR Admit Antipope Francis is Not in the Church?
« Reply #101 on: February 08, 2022, 05:14:21 PM »
Sedevacantism is no easy fix.

No take on the crisis is a fix at all.  One can only hope to ascertain what is, in fact, the present situation.  It seems rather clear that, after 55+ years, the only "fix" will come via Divine intervention -- something that has been foretold countless times over the course of several centuries.


Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Re: Feb 2nd 2022, The Day RnR Admit Antipope Francis is Not in the Church?
« Reply #102 on: February 08, 2022, 05:18:14 PM »
What is Gammarelli? Must be a sedevacantist term that I'm not familiar with.

No, it is a well-known supplier of high-end clerical garb.  I am sure +ABL wore their handiwork.

Maybe you could show some sense next time and use a search engine before you toss out a thoughtless jab that not only misses the mark, but makes you out to be an ignorant, mud-slinging bum?

Re: Feb 2nd 2022, The Day RnR Admit Antipope Francis is Not in the Church?
« Reply #103 on: February 08, 2022, 05:21:08 PM »
Chapter 12 of Daniel:  The Sacrifice of the Mass will come to an end.  We are nearly there.
I'd say we've been living that prophecy for over 50 years now.

https://schismatic-home-aloner.com/abomination-of-desolation-machabees/

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Re: Feb 2nd 2022, The Day RnR Admit Antipope Francis is Not in the Church?
« Reply #104 on: February 08, 2022, 05:22:27 PM »
I can see that you are offended by Fr. Chazal's description of sedevacantism as reducing the papacy to a cardboard cutout. However, he is FAR more charitable in his analysis of sedevacantism that you are of R&R. You are easily offended, but he is not. That's one of the reasons why R&R is superior to sedevacantism.

It ins't a question of being offended, sweetheart.  My skin is very thick, although I don't suffer idiocy very well.

It is called irony, as the take on the crisis which most reduces the Sovereign Pontiff to a cardboard cutout is your own beloved R&R.

FWIW, I hold to sede-privationism, not SV.  Whatevs...