CathInfo.com

It's amazing how thoroughly jewChurch propagandists have distorted &  buried the memory of Father Leonard Feeney.

Father was one of the few brilliant priest in the 1940's who knew the Faith and was prepared to fight for it.

When jew-masonry using American tax dollars and technology nuked Japan annihilating civilian populations, he immediately protested. 

Here's an article he wrote in "The Point" in 1952 describing the American Catholicism.
No other Catholic leaders had the guts to write the truth like this:

THE CHURCH MILITANT AND THE CHURCH DILETTANTE

.........

Every Catholic boy longs somehow for a crusade. He knows that that is what the Faith is meant to be — a glorious campaign for the love and honor of Jesus and Mary. And its fruits should be zeal, and courage, and sanctity, and greatness. But a Catholic boy in America does not find these things.

Instead of the Faith being the most important thing in his life, something to give himself to wholeheartedly, something to fight for and to die for, the Faith is made to seem to him humdrum, and routine, and not nearly as exciting as most other things. He is told that the Faith is something that he is required to hold, but that others are not. He is told that people who are plainly enemies of Christ and His Church are fundamentally good-willed and are trying to serve God according to their lights.

He is told that his primary duty is not preaching and protecting the sacred dogmas of the Faith, but is rather some cause like “brotherhood” that he has in common with those who reject such dogmas.


To an American Catholic boy, there seems to be no reason, no incentive for a crusade. The Church in America does not seem to need him to fight for it, or to want him to. It seems to be an organization that is politically powerful, wealthy, successful — and religiously unnecessary. It fights no battles and wins no victories. It produces no saints and inspires no heroes. It has no Don Johns, no St. Pius V’s, no Lepantos.

You're just playing semantics, you moron.  There's a natural analogue to justification, just as there are natural analogues to faith, hope, and charity, and there can be a natural version and a supernatural verison, just as there can be natural faith and supernatural faith.  Trent speaking about the one kind doesn't rule out the existence of another kind.

I've already mentioned the case of infants in Limbo.  They are in a state of natural justifice or friendship or non-enmity with God.  Yet they lack supernatural justification.

It's a marvel how you could be so stupid while accusing others of stupidity.

By which words, a description of the Justification of the impious is indicated,-as being a translation, from that state wherein man is born a child of the first Adam, to the state of grace, and of the adoption of the sons of God, through the second Adam, Jesus Christ, our Saviour.

Justification. In its active sense, Justification is the act of God declaring and making a person just; in its passive sense, it is the change in a soul which passes from the state of sin to that of sanctifying grace (q.v.) or justice.