Isn't this basically the same thing that the other thread posted? Or am I missing something?
I'm really not sure. I know something was posting something regarding this topic and the Dimond brothers but I do not know who posted first regarding Novus Ordo Watch which I believe has to be one of the better sites out there. What I particularly like about that site is that the writers are thorough and present undeniable facts while backing it up with authoritative and infallible docuмents that back up their claims. They have an amazing gift of pointing out the inconsistency and ironies of the "R & R" position and the direct contradiction with doctrine by the false V2 "Popes".
What a bunch of hooplah and confusion. People really take the Dimond brothers seriously here. Really!!! And no one seems to know the actual position taken by Fr. Kramer. Just a bunch of people stating things without even caring to see what Fr. Kramer himself says. :smash-pc:
What are you talking about? My information is from Novus Ordo Watch not the Dimonds. Do people actually read the posts or jump in after guessing what was posted? 
Father Kramer rejects the papacy of Frances but still accepts the other conciliar "Popes" as being valid. This has been mad clear.
Clearly if you are quoting someone else why would I be referring to you. Yes I read the posts. Fr. Kramer says the resignation of Benedict was not valid. His official position is una cuм papa nostro Benedicto. Just so you know.
I would imagine that if a Pope retires a Pope retires. That is one of the three ways the chair can become vacant. The others being death and public apostasy, heresy or schism. Oh yeah. Insanity or I guess if he had a sex change I suppose.
But what reason(s) does he give for Ratzinger's resignation not being a resignation?
The real reason is that he was never Pope in the first place and one cannot retire from a position that one does not hold.
Topic: Father Kramer Reject Francis (Read 5756 times)