Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Father Feeney was a Stubborn Teacher of Heresy  (Read 1362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Father Feeney was a Stubborn Teacher of Heresy
« on: October 06, 2009, 10:36:55 AM »

Father Feeney was a Stubborn Teacher of Heresy
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2009, 10:45:24 AM »
 :argue: :jumping2: :dancing-banana: :rahrah: :tv-disturbed:


Father Feeney was a Stubborn Teacher of Heresy
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2009, 10:49:49 AM »
Quote from: Lover of Truth
by Griff RubyThey claim the Letter was only written "from two heretical cardinals ... to one apostate archbishop,"


alread addressed, calumny and personal opinion.....Ruby is not a Church authority...

Feeny is dead and gone.Dimonds are unstable (they advertise on Alex Jones/ site...Jones is avowed Baptist and allows posts and articles attacking the Catholic faith....Dimonds,yup, reeal Catholic there!)

Of note, I read Jones, most is decent, but would not advertise on his site....

Moving on along..... :dancing:

Father Feeney was a Stubborn Teacher of Heresy
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2009, 10:55:00 AM »
One quick point, which I have made before, but it deserves mentioning again.  If I was an atheist, I could make the following historical observation:

Quote
From before the time of Saint Augustine until after the time of the Reformation, the Catholic Church believed that all non-Catholics went to Hell.


Find me a historian, secular, atheist, agnostic, religious (can be any religion), or otherwise, who disagrees, and I will reconsider my position.

Father Feeney was a Stubborn Teacher of Heresy
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2009, 01:31:39 PM »
1) Suprema haec sacra refers to doctrines taught, or at least referenced, in Sacred Scripture, and by Tertullian, Origen, and Saints Cyprian, Ambrose, Ursinius, Augustine, John Chrysostom, Gregory nαzιanz, Bernard, Thomas Aquinas, Bonaventure, Robert Bellarmine, and Alphonse Ligouri, explicitly ruled upon in favor by Popes Innocent II, Innocent III, Pius IX, Pius XII, and by both the Council and Catechism of Trent. By contrast, the "teaching" of the eleven "theologican-qualifiers" has no basis in any of Sacred Scripture, the Fathers, the Popes, any Council or Synod of the Church, and no Doctors. While it is true that St. Robert Bellarmine accepted the decision of these "theologian-qualifiers" since they officially spoke for the Holy Office, and the Pope did agree to their declaration the next day (in accordance to standard Holy Office procedure), his acceptance of this clearly came "after the fact" as he no doubt felt honor-bound to submit to the decision of the Holy Office (and thereby, the Pope) and even to do his level best at trying to defend their conclusion, no matter how patently nonsensical he may have even then suspected that it was.

If those guys don't got it right then the Catholic Faith is false.  Divine Revelation was given to the Apostles and Successors.  It ended with the death of the last Apostle.  It had not been fully expounded upon by Augustine or the Reformation.  

Those who do not believe what the Church teaches are like Protestant rigorist or the Orthodox who do not accept any doctrine, such as the Immaculate Conception, which was not fully expounded upon until after the split in 1054.  Maybe you should be Orthodox.

Or found the religion of [insert your name].

I'll "take my chances" with the Fathers, Doctors, Saints and Popes.