Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Vigano: This is proof that sitting on the Chair of Peter is not a pope  (Read 10245 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Archbishop Viganò: Bergoglio and the World Economic Forum are pursuing the same Antichrist agenda - LifeSite

"This is proof that sitting on the Chair of Peter is not a pope but an emissary of the globalist elite, whose mission is to destroy the Catholic Church" +Vigano

It is as if an association of arsonists complimented the fire chief for how he prevents fires from being put out. And instead the Bishops continue to pretend not to see and not to understand – some out of cowardice, some out of blackmail, some out of self-interest – that Bergoglio is a usurper of the Papal Throne, considering him just “a little too progressive." +Vigano

"If however, any one is not friendly, and speaks with those with whom his chief speaks not, such an one belongs to those who seek to exterminate the Church of God; and though he seems to be with you in body, he is against you in mind and heart. And such an one is a much more dangerous enemy than those who are without, and who are openly hostile. For this man under the guise of friendship acts the part of an enemy and scatters and ruins the church." - Pope St. Fabian (b. 20 January 250)

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Vigano: This is proof that sitting on the Chair of Peter is not a pope
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2025, 01:18:16 PM »
"This is proof that sitting on the Chair of Peter is not a pope but an emissary of the globalist elite

.

If he is not the pope than how is he sitting on the Chair of Peter? :facepalm:

Seriously, why is it so hard for him to say "Bergoglio is not the pope"? It's five tiny words!


Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Vigano: This is proof that sitting on the Chair of Peter is not a pope
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2025, 01:20:43 PM »
Bergoglio is a usurper of the Papal Throne
.

Again, this is not a denial of his papacy. The term "usurper" doesn't necessarily mean someone who does not have the authority he claims. There are many instances in history of someone usurping a throne illegitimately, but becoming the actual ruler, such as through assassinating the current king or leading a revolution or something similar.

Saying Bergoglio is a usurper is not equivalent to being sedevacantist.