Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Excellent video from David Bentley Hart which shows not all ecuмenism is bad  (Read 55615 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Banez123

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Reputation: +1/-19
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • A serious problem with modern Traditional Catholicism is that scholars and thinkers (of varying persuasions) are dismissed without serious consideration. Laity and even clergy in Tradition do this pretty often. The claim  that Pope Benedict XVI denied the Resurrection of Christ (a laughable idea for anyone who has actually read his work) is just one example that can be given. If you don't like Hart, Balthasar, Congar, Ratzinger, etc- that's fine. But read them first and develop serious responses to their work. That's all I'm saying. 

    Offline Banez123

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 29
    • Reputation: +1/-19
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Banez123
    Date Registered: September 04, 2024, 02:18:46 AM
    First post: Today at 08:09:18 PM

    This is likely an alternative spare profile from another user, probably the one who's been banned.

    These trolls, they always start with a bang. First post is already controversial.
    I was banned but then unbanned(at least when it comes to my previous account)

    I am a Traditional Catholic who attends the FSSP(I attended Resistance and SSPX back in the day) I don't attend the New Mass and wouldn't even consider doing so. Why should I be banned?


    Offline EternalKeys

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 16
    • Reputation: +7/-6
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • By the way, the question of universalism is a complex theological and philosophical question. It's not something that has a black and white answer. The Church Fathers grappled with it throughout the first millennium
    Judith 16
    "Woe be to the nation that riseth up against my people: for the Lord almighty will take revenge on them, in the day of judgment he will visit them. For he will give fire, and worms into their flesh, that they may burn, and may feel for ever"

    Fifth Ecuмenical Council, Anathemas Against Origen
    "If anyone shall say that all reasonable beings will one day be united in one, when the hypostases as well as the numbers and the bodies shall have disappeared, and that the knowledge of the world to come will carry with it the ruin of the worlds, and the rejection of bodies as also the abolition of [all] names, and that there shall be finally an identity of the γνῶσις and of the hypostasis; moreover, that in this pretended apocatastasis, spirits only will continue to exist, as it was in the feigned pre-existence: let him be anathema"

    Seventh Ecuмenical Council, Session VI (sourced from The Seventh General Council by John Mendham, Pg. 423)
    "If any one confess not the resurrection of the dead, the judgment to come, the retribution of each one according to his merits, in the righteous balance of the Lord that neither will there be any end of punishment nor indeed of the kingdom of heaven, that is the full enjoyment of God, for the kingdom of heaven is not meat and drink but righteousness joy and peace in the Holy Ghost, as the divine Apostle teaches, let him be anathema"
    "This is the confession of the patrons of our true faith — the holy Apostles, the divinely inspired Fathers: this is the confession of the Catholic Church, and not of heretics. That which follows, however, is their own, full of ignorance and absurdity, for thus they bluster."


    Offline Banez123

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 29
    • Reputation: +1/-19
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Judith 16
    "Woe be to the nation that riseth up against my people: for the Lord almighty will take revenge on them, in the day of judgment he will visit them. For he will give fire, and worms into their flesh, that they may burn, and may feel for ever"

    Fifth Ecuмenical Council, Anathemas Against Origen
    "If anyone shall say that all reasonable beings will one day be united in one, when the hypostases as well as the numbers and the bodies shall have disappeared, and that the knowledge of the world to come will carry with it the ruin of the worlds, and the rejection of bodies as also the abolition of [all] names, and that there shall be finally an identity of the γνῶσις and of the hypostasis; moreover, that in this pretended apocatastasis, spirits only will continue to exist, as it was in the feigned pre-existence: let him be anathema"

    Seventh Ecuмenical Council, Session VI (sourced from The Seventh General Council by John Mendham, Pg. 423)
    "If any one confess not the resurrection of the dead, the judgment to come, the retribution of each one according to his merits, in the righteous balance of the Lord that neither will there be any end of punishment nor indeed of the kingdom of heaven, that is the full enjoyment of God, for the kingdom of heaven is not meat and drink but righteousness joy and peace in the Holy Ghost, as the divine Apostle teaches, let him be anathema"
    "This is the confession of the patrons of our true faith — the holy Apostles, the divinely inspired Fathers: this is the confession of the Catholic Church, and not of heretics. That which follows, however, is their own, full of ignorance and absurdity, for thus they bluster."
    The ecuмenical councils must be understood in the way the Church understands them. 

    Here's my understanding. 

    I believe explicit faith in Christ is needed for salvation. However, I also think that God (to display his mercy and greater glory) may at the hour of death come to whomever he wishes and offer them this faith/salvation(either through an angel or Himself)


    Hell does exist, and those who die having committed grave sins will spend time there. However, whether it is eternal or ultimately comes to an end is a serious question. 

    Offline Banez123

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 29
    • Reputation: +1/-19
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • [...] for to this effect have the apostles decreed saying, With the excommunicated no fellowship is to be held. And if anyone, setting aside the rules wittingly, sings with the excommunicated in his house, or speaks or prays in company with them, that man is to be deprived of the privilege of communion. Such persons, therefore, are in all things to be guarded against, and are not to be received, because according to the apostle, not only those who commit such things are condemned, but also those who consent with those who do them."

    Pope St. Fabian (b. 20 January, 250)


    This quote comes from before the schism. The post-schism situation when it comes to the Orthodox is much more complex. 



    Offline AnthonyPadua

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2536
    • Reputation: +1303/-282
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This quote comes from before the schism. The post-schism situation when it comes to the Orthodox is much more complex.
    They deny the Holy Trinity when denying the Filioque, the Filioque is required for the opposition of relations of the Blessed Holy Trinity. Also I heard they (un)orthodox have false beliefs on purgatory and predestination, also their Churches are state Churches, also communism, also they deny the Council of Florence. 

    Quote
    Pope Eugene IV, “Cantate Domino", Council of Florence

    "It firmly believes, professes, and proclaims that those not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart “into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels”, unless before the end of life the same have been added to the flock; and that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation, and do fastings, almsgiving, and other functions of piety and exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward, and that no one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he has remained in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church."


    Offline Giovanni Berto

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1419
    • Reputation: +1149/-88
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was banned but then unbanned(at least when it comes to my previous account)

    I am a Traditional Catholic who attends the FSSP(I attended Resistance and SSPX back in the day) I don't attend the New Mass and wouldn't even consider doing so. Why should I be banned?

    I don't understand how you can start well and then go FSSP. Strange.

    I don't do the banning and I don't think that everybody who goes to the Novus Ordo should be banned. People might be here to learn and not for trolling.

    Anyway, tell us your previous username then, so we can understand your history here.

    Offline EternalKeys

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 16
    • Reputation: +7/-6
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The ecuмenical councils must be understood in the way the Church understands them.

    Here's my understanding.

    I believe explicit faith in Christ is needed for salvation. However, I also think that God (to display his mercy and greater glory) may at the hour of death come to whomever he wishes and offer them this faith/salvation(either through an angel or Himself)


    Hell does exist, and those who die having committed grave sins will spend time there. However, whether it is eternal or ultimately comes to an end is a serious question.
    As expressed in the Holy Bible, Sacred Tradition, papal statements, and ecuмenical councils, the eternality of hell is a dogma of the Catholic Church. 


    Offline AnthonyPadua

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2536
    • Reputation: +1303/-282
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • They deny the Holy Trinity when denying the Filioque, the Filioque is required for the opposition of relations of the Blessed Holy Trinity. Also I heard they (un)orthodox have false beliefs on purgatory and predestination, also their Churches are state Churches, also communism, also they deny the Council of Florence.
    How could I forget, they deny the Papacy.

    Offline AnthonyPadua

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2536
    • Reputation: +1303/-282
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Hell does exist, and those who die having committed grave sins will spend time there. However, whether it is eternal or ultimately comes to an end is a serious question.
    Heresy, Hell is eternal. Or do you perhaps believe that Heaven is not eternal? 

    Offline Banez123

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 29
    • Reputation: +1/-19
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't understand how you can start well and then go FSSP. Strange.

    I don't do the banning and I don't think that everybody who goes to the Novus Ordo should be banned. People might be here to learn and not for trolling.

    Anyway, tell us your previous username then, so we can understand your history here.
    I don't think the past history matters. Lets just say I had a very bad experience with a Trad group (I wasn't blameless in what happened but neither were they) 

    Again, I don't attend the New Mass. I attend the FSSP because the priests are well formed and allow people to think for themselves without intruding on their lives. 

    There are wonderful priests in other groups but I don't like the way groups to the right of the FSSP conduct themselves. I can go into more detail. 


    Offline Banez123

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 29
    • Reputation: +1/-19
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Heresy, Hell is eternal. Or do you perhaps believe that Heaven is not eternal?
    Instead of arguing with you, I'll recommend you read Balthasar for Thomists (a recent book by the Dominican Fr. Aidan Nichols) That will answer your questions.

    Offline Giovanni Berto

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1419
    • Reputation: +1149/-88
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't think the past history matters. Lets just say I had a very bad experience with a Trad group (I wasn't blameless in what happened but neither were they)

    Again, I don't attend the New Mass. I attend the FSSP because the priests are well formed and allow people to think for themselves without intruding on their lives.

    There are wonderful priests in other groups but I don't like the way groups to the right of the FSSP conduct themselves. I can go into more detail.

    So you have a little secret huh?:trollface:

    I don't know any FSSP priests, but their Holy Orders are doubtful. That's why they are out of the question for me.

    Offline Banez123

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 29
    • Reputation: +1/-19
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So you have a little secret huh?:trollface:

    I don't know any FSSP priests, but their Holy Orders are doubtful. That's why they are out of the question for me.
    Not a secret. Just an unfortunate event which doesn't need to be rehashed. 

    As for your comment on FSSP orders, I (and Fr. Pierre Marie of Avrille) would disagree with you. It's a debatable question. 

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33126
    • Reputation: +29433/-605
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is his previous account:
    https://www.cathinfo.com/profile/Banezian/

    Indeed his previous account is in good standing. Why the new account? That's against the rules you know.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.