How many laymen acccuse Francis od heresy, apostasy, sacrilege, abomination of desolation and almost none of the bishops and cardinals?

Indeed.  So the most "bold" of the Cardinals submitted these mealy-mouthed dubia, doubts or basically "uncertainties".  So, let us recall that not only those who deny dogma are heretics but also those who doubt a dogma.  So if you're not sure whether what Bergoglio taught in, say, Amoris Laetitia, is heresy, then you're a heretic too.  But even this weak nonsense they could only get about a half dozen to sign.  That means the rest are in total apostasy.

So, what's happened over time is once you get that first infiltrator "pope" in there, he just appoints other infiltrators as Cardinals and bishops, other Masons, Communists, Jews, etc. ... until after about 50-60 years there's no one left among the Cardinals who's not one of the club.  There are probably some bishops here or there who aren't infiltrators, but probably no Cardinals.

Indeed.  So the most "bold" of the Cardinals submitted these mealy-mouthed dubia, doubts or basically "uncertainties".  So, let us recall that not only those who deny dogma are heretics but also those who doubt a dogma.  So if you're not sure whether what Bergoglio taught in, say, Amoris Laetitia, is heresy, then you're a heretic too.  But even this weak nonsense they could only get about a half dozen to sign.  That means the rest are in total apostasy.

So, what's happened over time is once you get that first infiltrator "pope" in there, he just appoints other infiltrators as Cardinals and bishops, other Masons, Communists, Jews, etc. ... until after about 50-60 years there's no one left among the Cardinals who's not one of the club.  There are probably some bishops here or there who aren't infiltrators, but probably no Cardinals.

For most of the Cardinals or bishops in the conciliar church I don't even think it's a matter of ideological/theological commitment or belief in Vatican II. It's the same mentality you would have found among the bureaucrats of communist countries during the cold war. There's a certain kind of person that adapts easily to whatever system is in place that enables them to advance within that system because they don't question the objectives of said system and are adept at pleasing those above them. You will find such brown nosers in a large department store or insurance company or government agency. 
There are definitely some snakes that knew every step of the way where they wanted to take the Church. Joseph Bernadin was such a saboteur. Then there are others who like the status, having their ring kissed, being called your excellency, staying at fancy hotels for those countless conferences. They are not going to swim against the tide because they have spent a lifetime swimming with the current. They only serve their own ambition. I would probably
put Cupich in this category. He is cunning but doesn't seem very smart, not the kind of guy who reads Albert Pike in his spare time. 

Shouldn't pick Pope from the college of cardinals then. I have a really bad feeling about this conclave and an even bigger disaster befalling the Church. Please God this doesn't happen!! What's the chances of Archbishop Vigano getting elected?

Indeed, even Taylor Marshall identified 18 "Cardinals" who are quasi-conservative or might lean that way, but only 5 that even he considered true conservatives.  Of course, from our perspective, 3 of them were nonsense and were on the list just because they opposed the blessing of sodomite couples (and that does not suffice to make them true conservatives).

Really the only ones who MIGHT be conservative as in favoring Tridentine Mass, being against some of the V2 errors / directions, are Sarah and Burke.  That's IT.  Burke has no chance.

So the Trad, Inc. grifter types have all their hopes on Sarah ... but Marshall made it clear he'd pretty much accept anyone they rolled out (leading to suspicion that he's just a gatekeeper), and would even welcome a few of the quasi-conservatives like Erdo (friendly with Jews, anti-anti-Semitic, loves the New Mass etc.), or Pizzabolla (Ecuмenist, esp. toward Jews, no really comment about Mass, etc.), and one African guy (not Sarah, but name escapes me) who opposed blessing sodomites but has otherwise been fairly Modernist.

THIS IS THE BEST THE CONCILIAR CHURCH HAS.

So, absolutely, not a single one of these are fit to be a Catholic Pope, no, not even Sarah, because for all his "I like the Tridentine Mass" (personal preference for piety and not theological reasons) ... he's done nothing about it.

No current Conciliar bishop is fit to be Pope for the same reasons, not even a Schneider, since Schneider has done damage control for Bergoglio and IMO is controlled opposition, believing that slight corrections to V2 are all that's required.  Again, this is the best they've got.

Until something like the prophecy / vision of Anna Maria Taigi comes to pass, where Sts. Peter and Paul select the Holy Pope to end the crisis, there's no natural hope from the Conciliar Antichurch.  Now, Taigi said that they would pick the "Cardinal" that would be the pope, but that's likely just her interpretation of what she say, thinking that only Cardinals will become pope (which is normally the case) ... but I fully expect them to select someone else, undoubtedly a Traditional Catholic bishop or priest.

Of course, even there, very few Trad clergy understand the true theological roots of the crisis:  EENS and the resulting ecclesiology, and are actually on the wrong side of the issue, or else have a quasi-Old-Catholic R&R viewpoint or else an attitude of papolatry (exaggerated view of infallibility).  I fully expect the selection to come from someone who's currently not widely known to the world.