It's cute and pithy, but what does he mean by "focusing on the subjective"?
Caminus, go listen to it if you can. It is the show from April 26, the first hour (Fr. Sebastian Walshe). He discusses it in the first fifteen/twenty minutes or so before anyone called in. It is the host of the show that asked him about it.
What he doesn't seem to understand is that doctrine cannot pertain to subjectivist concerns, all law, all doctrine pertains to objective truth. That's part of the problem with DH: it is subjectivist.
There's a major distinction involved in this discussion. The external vs. internal forum. The State and the Church can only judge matters in the external forum, according to objective rules and measures. In this case it is the truth of religion. To force the matter into the subjective, internal forum, which is the arena of intention and conscience, is to devastate the formal object of doctrine.
In other words, to consider what people feel and subjectively think about their own religion as a norm of law is to deny objective truth and the revelation of God Himself. A Catholic state doesn't consider subjective feelings, but must consider among other things what really pertains to the common good of their respective society, which is an objective rule. The only objective element in DH is the consideration of public order which is essentially a matter of the security of the State. But there was never any liberal catholic who would have been so insane as to admit a religious liberty which would subvert the security of the State itself. Thus, for DH's defenders to refer to this criteria is immaterial.
Thus, this is not a development of doctrine but a very deep perversion which paralyzes the mind and ends by negating the divine order of creation. For this priest to praise the subjectivity of the Council is to betray a mind utterly lost and detached from reality.