Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38]

Author Topic: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?  (Read 3473 times)

1 Member and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?
« Reply #185 on: Today at 09:25:05 AM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Today at 09:20:24 AM

You're acting like there is some kind of equality of character between Thuc and Lefebvre.

The instability of mind is SUPPORTIVE evidence of possible withholding of intention. Such an accusation was never leveled against Lefebvre. EVER.
Accusations are negative doubts.  Anyone can be accused of anything.  It proves nothing.  I’m sorry you (and Maria) can’t grasp this concept.  This is your major error.  Your secondary one being stubborn and close-minded.  
Logged

Offline Maria Dolorosa

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?
« Reply #186 on: Today at 09:45:31 AM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on Yesterday at 08:51:18 PM
Who cares?  None of this affects +Thuc’s ability to consecrate.  It’s completely off-topic.  With each post, you further prove you don’t understand the principles in question. 
Lol, you cannot even guess why I may have shared this. I cannot help but laugh, this is so silly! Don't be surprised that I am no longer responding to your absurd commentary, especially when you repeatedly prove yourself to have not read the long post I made, which contained important information that shows how the validity of the sacraments, and moral theology, are related.
Logged

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?
« Reply #187 on: Today at 10:13:04 AM »
Quote from: Maria Dolorosa on Today at 09:45:31 AM
Lol, you cannot even guess why I may have shared this. I cannot help but laugh, this is so silly! Don't be surprised that I am no longer responding to your absurd commentary, especially when you repeatedly prove yourself to have not read the long post I made, which contained important information that shows how the validity of the sacraments, and moral theology, are related.
Nobody wants to guess. Act like an adult and make an argument or write your point.  

Sorry, sacramental theology and canon law govern the sacraments not moral theology.  If the matter/form are valid, then the sacrament is valid.  No amount of heresy/schism makes a bishop no longer a bishop.  You’re grasping at straws with your off-topic posts, which show you are woefully uneducated on the topic.  
Logged

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?
« Reply #188 on: Today at 10:18:45 AM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Today at 09:22:21 AM
Those who try to deny the obvious craziness of Thuc are motivated by their bias in trying to prove that his line had no problems.

They are not objective.
Wrong again because I have no bias whatsoever, you 're the one with the bias. You only have this bias because you believe a lie about the man, really, that's all there is to it. Nothing against you personally, but it's not too surprising. But if you stop to actually think exactly what it is you're bent on trying to convince everyone of, seems like you should see how ridiculous it really is.  

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38]
« previous next »