Author Topic: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid? (Read 3093 times)

Lazarus · « **Reply #155 on:** **Today** at 05:05:41 PM »

Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Today at 05:03:09 PM

Public letters retracting his Catholicism and publicly participating in the Novus Ordo.

Perfectly normal in your view.

ok so.

Apostasy isn't insanity, though. Otherwise, every Vatican-II believer would be insane.

TomGubbinsKimmage · « **Reply #156 on:** **Today** at 05:08:13 PM »

Quote from: MonsieurValentine on Today at 07:06:59 AM

When it comes to the Thuc detractors I'm reminded of the Stalin quote, "show me the man and I'll show you the crime."
No other bishop in the history of the Church has been subjected to the same degree of scrutiny. If every bishop had then most
would probably suffer under the same specter of doubt.
I can't help but think this controversy comes down to politics more than canon law. There are those who feel threatened by
the theological positions of some Catholic sects and want to cast doubt, with a vengeance, on the validity of their leaders.
These are essentially indirect ad hominem attacks. By destroying Thuc, they destroy Sanborn, Pfiefer, Mckenna, Roy, etc.
It disgusts me

Over 400 bishops are descended from him.

He repented of his traditionalism,

He said the Novus Ordo later and we have photos.

He DETRACTED HIMSELF.

Dont be a sanctimonious retard please. Its rather pathetic.

TomGubbinsKimmage · « **Reply #157 on:** **Today** at 05:10:38 PM »

Quote from: Pax Vobis on Today at 03:19:05 PM

Ahhh, I see the confusion. Who knows if +Thuc even wrote a letter. ?? The Angelus is responsible for posting it. They should've included it along with their article. But they didn't.

What is wrong you with you.

You're not paying attention at all to what's going on.

Pax Vobis · « **Reply #158 on:** **Today** at 05:11:13 PM »

Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Today at 05:08:13 PM

Over 400 bishops are descended from him.

He repented of his traditionalism,

He said the Novus Ordo later and we have photos.

He DETRACTED HIMSELF.

Dont be a sanctimonious retard please. Its rather pathetic.

None of this invalidates the sacraments.

TomGubbinsKimmage · « **Reply #159 on:** **Today** at 05:12:37 PM »

Quote from: Lazarus on Today at 05:05:41 PM

Apostasy isn't insanity, though. Otherwise, every Vatican-II believer would be insane.

those are not the only things. But the most obvious.

And it's compared to what he was before rather than people who were duped all along.

Your cope is not going to wash with most people.

There's an entire article written by infotradicion on the subject.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid? (Read 3093 times)

Lazarus

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?

TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?

TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?

Pax Vobis

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?

TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?