Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?  (Read 395 times)

1 Member and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?
« on: Yesterday at 05:18:42 PM »
Please post evidence which supports the claim that +Thuc ordinations are invalid.  (Please do not include the Palmaranian sect in this discussion. This discussion is about Trad priests.)
Logged

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 09:24:14 PM »
Still waiting for evidence…
Logged

Offline Mr G

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?
« Reply #2 on: Today at 07:43:57 AM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on Yesterday at 09:24:14 PM
Still waiting for evidence…
The closest you are going to get, would be Fr. Jenkin's arguments against Thuc, but there are convincing counterarguments to show that Thuc consecrations are valid. Bishop Williamson and Fr. Chazal, both against the sedevacantists position, admit that the Thuc consecrations are valid, so it seems as you begin your research that you going to find more evidence leaning toward validity. 
Logged

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?
« Reply #3 on: Today at 07:56:57 AM »
Quote from: Mr G on Today at 07:43:57 AM
The closest you are going to get, would be Fr. Jenkin's arguments against Thuc, but there are convincing counterarguments to show that Thuc consecrations are valid. Bishop Williamson and Fr. Chazal, both against the sedevacantists position, admit that the Thuc consecrations are valid, so it seems as you begin your research that you going to find more evidence leaning toward validity.
I agree with you.  Started this thread to expose the slanderous people from the other thread who avoid +Thuc sacraments based on nothing but 5th-hand stories and rumors.  
Logged

Online TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?
« Reply #4 on: Today at 08:20:07 AM »
In a matter so grave as Sacramental validity, we must abstain where the suspicion is credible.

Trying to say that it is about "evidence" is a deliberate (and quite frankly retarded) distraction.


Our Lord Jesus Christ did not choose the Thuc line to preserve his Church, He chose the Lefebvre line. A mentally stable man, with no accusations at all of withholding intention.

Folks, dont be a Thuc-tard. Its pathethic.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
« previous next »