Author Topic: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid? (Read 654 times)

Lazarus · « **Reply #15 on:** **Yesterday** at 08:56:48 PM »

Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Yesterday at 04:38:13 PM

hmmm

Was Our Lord being "Christian" when he attacked the "brood of vipers"

Stop being such a panzy and man up.

You are in communion with a heretic who claims that buddhists and hinduists, when praying to their false pagan idols, are praying to God. You also believe that native americans when praying to the earth goddess are in communion with the Catholic Church. That makes you in communion with Satan himself. It's time for you to face the truth, you are a pagan, worse, you are a satanist !

You lack emotional restraint, you also lack charity, your language is vulgar and goes against proper Catholic behaviour, and to finish this off you are a heretic. It is easy to see the fruits of your false faith, simply looking at your behaviour and your words is more than enough.

A catho-lite such as yourself daring to give moral lectures to others, you are a joke and God hates your guts. How can you dare lecture others, when your own soul is so dirty? You aren't even in a state of grace. If you die of a stroke or anything in the next days, you are going to hell.

Maria Dolorosa · « **Reply #16 on:** **Yesterday** at 09:13:22 PM »

Quote from: Lazarus on Yesterday at 08:56:48 PM

You are in communion with a heretic who claims that buddhists and hinduists, when praying to their false pagan idols, are praying to God. You also believe that native americans when praying to the earth goddess are in communion with the Catholic Church. That makes you in communion with Satan himself. It's time for you to face the truth, you are a pagan, worse, you are a satanist !

You lack emotional restraint, you also lack charity, your language is vulgar and goes against proper Catholic behaviour, and to finish this off you are a heretic.

A catho-lite such as yourself daring to give moral lectures to others, you are a joke and God hates your guts. How can you dare lecture others, when your own soul is so dirty? You aren't even in a state of grace. If you die of a stroke or anything in the next days, you are going to hell.

Are you forgetting that this forum officially supports the Resistance?

Do you really believe that this language of yours would move anyone to repent?

St. Francis de Sales, Introduction to the Devout Life, Rash Judgement

Judge not, and you shall not: be judged (Luke vi, 37) says the Saviour of our souls; ’condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. No, says the holy Apostle (1 Cor. iv, 5) judge not before the time, until the Lord come, who will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts. Oh! how displeasing to God are rash judgements! The judgements of the children of men are rash, because they are not judges one of another, and in judging they usurp the office of our Lord; they are rash, because the chief malice of sin depends on the intention and counsel of the heart, which is a hidden thing of darkness to us; they are rash, because each one has enough to do to judge himself, without undertaking to judge his neighbour. In order not to be judged ourselves, it is equally necessary for us not to judge others and to judge ourselves; for, as our Lord forbids the one, so the Apostle commands the other, saying: If we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. (1 Cor. xi, 31) But, O God, we do just the contrary, for we cease not to do what is forbidden, judging our neighbour at every turn; but we never do what is commanded, which is to judge ourselves.

Lazarus · « **Reply #17 on:** **Yesterday** at 09:30:25 PM »

Quote from: Maria Dolorosa on Yesterday at 09:13:22 PM

Are you forgetting that this forum officially supports the Resistance?

Do you really believe that this language of yours would move anyone to repent?

St. Francis de Sales, Introduction to the Devout Life, Rash Judgement

Judge not, and you shall not: be judged (Luke vi, 37) says the Saviour of our souls; ’condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. No, says the holy Apostle (1 Cor. iv, 5) judge not before the time, until the Lord come, who will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts. Oh! how displeasing to God are rash judgements! The judgements of the children of men are rash, because they are not judges one of another, and in judging they usurp the office of our Lord; they are rash, because the chief malice of sin depends on the intention and counsel of the heart, which is a hidden thing of darkness to us; they are rash, because each one has enough to do to judge himself, without undertaking to judge his neighbour. In order not to be judged ourselves, it is equally necessary for us not to judge others and to judge ourselves; for, as our Lord forbids the one, so the Apostle commands the other, saying: If we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. (1 Cor. xi, 31) But, O God, we do just the contrary, for we cease not to do what is forbidden, judging our neighbour at every turn; but we never do what is commanded, which is to judge ourselves.

Theological acrobatics have a political purpose, rather than a religious one. In private, what they believe is very different from what they preach in public in order to still be able to financially operate.

If you understand that, then you understand that rather than fighting each other, traditionalists are on the same side, but using different strategies in order to win.

As for someone who isn't even a traditionalist but one of those freemasonic leftists posing as christians, their actions and thoughts are abominable in the eyes of God.

Lazarus · « **Reply #18 on:** **Yesterday** at 09:36:37 PM »

Quote from: Maria Dolorosa on Yesterday at 09:13:22 PM

Are you forgetting that this forum officially supports the Resistance?

Do you really believe that this language of yours would move anyone to repent?

St. Francis de Sales, Introduction to the Devout Life, Rash Judgement

Judge not, and you shall not: be judged (Luke vi, 37) says the Saviour of our souls; ’condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. No, says the holy Apostle (1 Cor. iv, 5) judge not before the time, until the Lord come, who will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts. Oh! how displeasing to God are rash judgements! The judgements of the children of men are rash, because they are not judges one of another, and in judging they usurp the office of our Lord; they are rash, because the chief malice of sin depends on the intention and counsel of the heart, which is a hidden thing of darkness to us; they are rash, because each one has enough to do to judge himself, without undertaking to judge his neighbour. In order not to be judged ourselves, it is equally necessary for us not to judge others and to judge ourselves; for, as our Lord forbids the one, so the Apostle commands the other, saying: If we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. (1 Cor. xi, 31) But, O God, we do just the contrary, for we cease not to do what is forbidden, judging our neighbour at every turn; but we never do what is commanded, which is to judge ourselves.

You should read what he wrote, so that you understand my answer in the context of the conversation. Otherwise, your admonishments are not only worthless, but silence would be the superior choice.

Maria Dolorosa · « **Reply #19 on:** **Yesterday** at 10:20:04 PM »

Quote from: Lazarus on Yesterday at 09:36:37 PM

You should read what he wrote, so that you understand my answer in the context of the conversation. Otherwise, your admonishments are not only worthless, but silence would be the superior choice.

I did read what he wrote, before I responded to you.

My post directed to you was not an admonition, I wanted real answers to my real questions.

Sharing something from a saint is just that: sharing something from a saint. I did so because it is rash to say Tom is not in the state of grace, worse than a pagan, and a satanist. He did not accuse you of such things.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid? (Read 654 times)

Lazarus

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?

Maria Dolorosa

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?

Lazarus

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?

Lazarus

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?

Maria Dolorosa

Re: Is there evidence that +Thuc ordinations are invalid?