Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?  (Read 16074 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Meg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6173
  • Reputation: +3147/-2941
  • Gender: Female
Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
« Reply #45 on: September 18, 2019, 11:13:09 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!3
  • But, to be fair to Fr Cekada, the sspx never explained R&R that way, which is problematic, and I believe their wishy-washy theology on this (their failure to call the V2 popes heretics and the failure to say that their spiritual office is impaired) has led to their current situation.  Their lack of fortitude on this (as well as failure to condemn the new mass clearly) is a sign of lukewarmness towards error.  And so, this lack of clarity is rightly corrected by Fr Cekada and others.  ...What a mess!

    So the failure of +ABL (and by extension the SSPX) to pronounce the sedeprivationist view is what has led to the current situation. And their lack of fortitude in condemning the new mass is a sign of lukewarmness toward error, which, as you contend, has rightly corrected by Cekada. Right. The thing is, the SSPX used to take a hardline stance on the new mass. Even so, +ABL did not condemn it outright.

    Fr. Cekada is a dogmatic sedevacantist. Whatever he "corrects" has to be seen in that light. But of course the sedewhatevers will quote him when it suits them. 

    The sedewhatevers (like yourself) criticize +ABL and the SSPX of old, but in fact sedewhateverism hasn't done anything to correct the Crisis and situation we are in. Nothing at all. Just a lot of pontificating and lording it over others.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline MiserereMei

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 174
    • Reputation: +88/-16
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #46 on: September 18, 2019, 11:33:23 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is just a thought... Since there has not been an unanimous opinion among theologians or an official Church pronouncement on this topic (not just recently but through the Church history), shouldn't all these positions be considered "opinions"? Even +MLefebvre, who had much more knowledge than any of us and had personal contact with the Roman hierarchy, couldn't tell with certainty if the pope was still "the pope". At one point in the future when this mess is fixed, everyone will have to yield to one position, the one that the triumphal Church declares to be the true one. In the meantime we need to be charitable among us and keep in mind that our opinion may be one of the wrong ones. Also let's remember that at one point before the 2nd coming of our Lord it will seem that everything is lost (no more bishops?). 


    Offline MiserereMei

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 174
    • Reputation: +88/-16
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #47 on: September 18, 2019, 11:43:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I forgot to add that at least we agree that there is a problem with the official hierarchy and everything contrary to the faith is to be avoided.

    Offline Nishant Xavier

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2873
    • Reputation: +1893/-1750
    • Gender: Male
    • Immaculate Heart of Mary, May Your Triumph Come!
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #48 on: September 18, 2019, 11:57:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Quote from: Meg
    Quote from: Meg I'm glad that you are saying something about the problem of sedeism, because it is a BIG problem in tradition. Good luck trying to get through to them, though (sedes). Most of them are too far gone. Here in the U.S., individualism is rampant, and sedeism is an extreme form of individualism
    Yes, Svism is a problem, that's probably why the SSPX endorsed an excellent book by Salza and Siscoe that thoroughly refutes sedevacantism. https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/sedevacantism-refuted-true-or-false-pope-brian-mccall Nevertheless, I regard most of those who've fallen to the error as Traditional Catholic brothers and sisters. I know quite a few former sedes who are now non-SV Traditional Catholics. For many of them, the consideration mentioned in the OP was decisive. The main problem with SVism is this, when we hold to easy ideas like "all I need to do is say he's not the Pope, and everything will be fine", the end goal of final Restoration in Rome gets delayed. I believe in the next decade, as 60+ year svism becomes increasingly absurd to many, we will see many SVs become non sv traditionalists, and the cause of Restoration will advance quickly. 

    Quote
    However, IMO,....it's not a good idea to make a case, as you do in the above post, that the SSPX either will or does somehow boldly stand for Truth, and as such, clergy in the conciliar church are counting on them to stand for Truth.
    Well, it was docuмented in the OP link I gave that many members of the Catholic Hierachy agreed with His Excellency Bishop Fellay on the "open questions" like ecuмenism and interfaith dialogue, and many had praised and lauded H.E. for fighting them. But here's a more recent interview from Rev. Father Pagliarani, where Father condemns Amazon synod's apostasy, and much else besides. The problem with the Resistance is that they're not really interested in doing anything, as if just condemning is going to be enough. What is really important is this - training an Army of Priests, say at least 10,000 in the next 10 to 20 years. It would be wonderful if all Traditional Fraternities united to do this, "Unite the Clans", or a Holy Alliance.

    https://fsspx.news/en/church-its-head-50632 The Resistance doesn't want to do that. Some Resisters seem to want even to prevent us from doing it. The SSPX continues to condemn error. But right now it is more focused on the goal of forming many holy Traditional Priests.

    Quote from: Pax Vobis
    But you can’t have one foot “under new-rome” and one foot with Tradition
    Riiight. Try finding this in a Traditional Catechism or theology manual if you can. This is what Fr. Gueranger says about such a false attitude, "We, then, both priests and people, have a right to know whence our pastors have received their power. From whose hand have they received the keys? If their mission come from the Apostolic See, let us honor and obey them, for they are sent to us by Jesus Christ, who has invested them, through Peter, with His own authority ... Thus it is that the divine Founder of the Church, who willed that she should be a city seated on a mountain, gave her visibility; it was an essential requisite; for since all were called to enter her pale, all must be able to see her. But He was not satisfied with this. He moreover willed that the spiritual power exercised by her pastors should come from a visible source, so that the faithful might have a sure means of verifying the claims of those who were to guide them in His name. Our Lord (we say it reverently) owed this to us; for, on the last day, He will not receive us as His children, unless we shall have been members of His Church, and have lived in union with Him by the ministry of pastors lawfully constituted."

    You can find the same teaching of necessary subordination to the Hierarchical Teaching Church in Pope St. Pius X's Catechism. See "The Ninth Article of the Creed, Q. 38 to 72." E.g. https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/catechism-of-st-pius-x-1286 45 Q. Who, then, are they who possess the teaching power in the Church? A. The teaching power in the Church is possessed by the Pope and the Bishops, and, dependent on them, by the other sacred ministers. 46 Q. Are we obliged to hear the Teaching Church? A. Yes, without doubt we are obliged under pain of eternal damnation to hear the Teaching Church; for Jesus Christ has said to the Pastors of His Church, in the persons of the Apostles: "He who hears you, hears Me, and he who despises you, despises Me."

    True Tradition is Tradition in Communion with the Church of Rome, the Church of 2000 years, the Church of all time. "Come and attend Mass in this chapel with the priests of the Society, and, in the various centers, bring about a regrouping of the faithful staying with the Society, so that they keep their bond with Rome and with the Church. It is very important that there should always be the bond with Rome if we wish to remain Catholic; even if we do not agree with everything being done in Rome, I think the bond is absolutely indispensable."


    As for liars who call the Society schismatic, who hardly deserve to be answered again, the Pope himself has answered them, "As a result of the Pope’s act, during the Holy Year, we will have ordinary jurisdiction. In the image I mentioned, this has the effect of giving us the official insignia of firefighters, whereas such a status was denied us for decades" https://damselofthefaith.wordpress.com/2015/12/01/ordinary-jurisdiction-for-the-year-of-mercy-bishop-fellay-says/ It is Pope Francis himself who refutes the calumny, and Bishop Fellay has rightly explained, with the indefinite extension of those faculties by the Holy Father, that SSPX Bishops do indeed have Ordinary Jurisdiction going forward. The right path for SVists is to return to Catholic Communion, by recognizing the Pope, obtaining Habitual Jurisdiction from him, and working for the Restoration of Tradition from within the Church. It's not true that Jurisdiction is a human invention; Papal Primacy of Jurisdiction is Dogma. Jurisdiction is Represented in Scripture by the Keys, it is Divinely Instituted. No non-Catholic Bishop can ever have Ordinary Jurisdiction, either "Old Catholic", "Orthodox" or anyone else. Only Catholic Hierarchs can have OJ, by divine law.
     
    "We wish also to make amends for the insults to which Your Vicar on earth and Your Priests are everywhere subjected [above all by schismatic sedevacantists - Nishant Xavier], for the profanation, by conscious neglect or Terrible Acts of Sacrilege, of the very Sacrament of Your Divine Love; and lastly for the Public Crimes of Nations who resist the Rights and The Teaching Authority of the Church which You have founded." - Act of Reparation to the Sacred Heart of Lord Jesus.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #49 on: September 18, 2019, 11:57:57 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Being completely honest, I always defined R&R mentally as “Recognize” the govt office but “Resist” that which I’m not bound to follow.
    .
    Sedeprivationism basically says the same thing, just explains it in formal theological terms.

    Right, the main difference being that classic R&R holds that you still are obliged to follow things that are not bad or harmful, i.e. that they still have authority, but it can be counter-manded on a case-by-case basis.  So, Pope orders A and B.  A is good; B is bad.  We are obliged to follow A but not obliged to follow B, in fact are obliged NOT to follow B.  With sedeprivationism, we are not bound to follow/do EITHER A or B since the heresy of the one commanding him deprives one of authority in general.  This is the main difference that Father Chazal's position had from classic R&R and why it's so closely akin to sedeprivationism.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #50 on: September 18, 2019, 12:03:23 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr. Cekada is a dogmatic sedevacantist. Whatever he "corrects" has to be seen in that light. But of course the sedewhatevers will quote him when it suits them.

    You really need to grow up, Meg, and stop posting these emotional rants.  Grow up and try to look at every point or argument made by anyone objectively.  If you accept it, accept it.  If you reject it, then reject it.  You can't throw the baby out with the bath-water for either side just because you've become emotionally attached to one group or camp.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10306
    • Reputation: +6216/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #51 on: September 18, 2019, 12:14:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    So, Pope orders A and B.  A is good; B is bad.  We are obliged to follow A but not obliged to follow B, in fact are obliged NOT to follow B.  With sedeprivationism, we are not bound to follow/do EITHER A or B since the heresy of the one commanding him deprives one of authority in general.
    I get the distinction between the 2 views.  However, if a pope still has the material/govt office (as both views agree he does), then if he orders us to do A (and A is a good thing), both views would have to follow A, depending on what it is.  For example, a few years ago, Pope Francis asked (he did not order) that everyone fast for peace in Syria.  There's nothing wrong with this, even if it is outside of the material/govt office.  Why would you not follow this?  Probably a bad example, but you get the point.
    .
    If +Francis came out tomorrow and ordered that all catholics must fast on Saturdays in honor of Our Lady, even though I know he's a heretic, i'd probably follow such a rule.  Some might say that i'm being hypocritical, but I'd rather be obedient than not.  ...The good thing is that since V2, we've not had any such tests, and God in His mercy has not allowed such contradictory obstacles, but it's still a unique question.

    Offline ByzCat3000

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1889
    • Reputation: +500/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #52 on: September 18, 2019, 12:15:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'll provide proof of this as soon as you can provide proof that's it's permissible for Catholics to reject a General Council of the Church due to their private interpretation of Catholic doctrine and reject the Rite of Mass promulgated by the Pope as harmful to faith.  There's no "proof" for any of this.  R&R is universally rejected by all pre-Vatican II theological sources.  We're all trying to take principles and apply them, but the crisis itself is unprecedented.  Please refer to the "One Ring" thread posted by Matthew.

    If you want to see the theological reasoning behind sedeprivationism, read the Cacciacuм thesis by +Guerard des Lauriers.

    Those quotes of yours do not directly contradict the thesis.  As per usual, you are missing the generic distinctions.  There's significant historical and theological precedent to argue that the power of appointment or designation is materially tied to the office, while the ability to legitimately exercise it is part of the formal aspect of the power.  That's why Orthodox lines of the Apostolic Sees are considered to in fact have materially descended from those Sees, and the Church doesn't try to fill those Patriarchates.
    I still don’t understand how this logic doesn’t just lead to hermeneutic of continuity rather than either R and R or Sedevacantism though, just by necessity.  And I say that as someone who certainly sympathizes with elements of R and R 


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #53 on: September 18, 2019, 12:23:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I get the distinction between the 2 views.  However, if a pope still has the material/govt office (as both views agree he does), then if he orders us to do A (and A is a good thing), both views would have to follow A, depending on what it is.  For example, a few years ago, Pope Francis asked (he did not order) that everyone fast for peace in Syria.  There's nothing wrong with this, even if it is outside of the material/govt office.  Why would you not follow this?  Probably a bad example, but you get the point.
    Sure, if he says something good, maybe you SHOULD follow it.  But the question is whether your are obligated to do so based on his authority.  So, if Pope Francis were to command, "on March 24 of 2020, every Catholic must abstain, under pain of sin, from meat in reparation for sins against Our Lady", yes, that's a good thing, but ... would you be committing a positive sin if you didn't.  I'm not talking about a sin of omission but a positive sin of failing to be subject to his authority.  If classic R&R, then yes, you would be sinning.  If sedeprivationist, you would not consider this a sin of disobedience ... even if it might be a sin of omission, failure to do something good that you should do.

    Offline Bonaventure

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1238
    • Reputation: +789/-272
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #54 on: September 18, 2019, 12:23:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I believe in the next decade, as 60+ year svism becomes increasingly absurd to many, we will see many SVs become non sv traditionalists, and the cause of Restoration will advance quickly. .

    Well, if ~60 years of it wasn't enough, what's another decade or two?  Don't be surprised if after another 50 years this absurdity still exists.

    Quote
    ...but in fact sedewhateverism hasn't done anything to correct the Crisis and situation we are in. Nothing at all. Just a lot of pontificating and lording it over others.



    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10306
    • Reputation: +6216/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #55 on: September 18, 2019, 12:36:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    but in fact sedewhateverism hasn't done anything to correct the Crisis and situation we are in. Nothing at all. Just a lot of pontificating and lording it over others.
    Neither has R&R.  You obviously miss the point that none of these views is meant to SOLVE the problem (because that's an impossibility); these views are only meant to EXPLAIN the problem so that people can take practical actions to save their souls.  
    .
    As much as I loathe Fr Cekada for many things, he makes some valid points on the problems of the sspx’s type of R&R.  But Fr Cekada’s dogmatism is just as problematic.  
    .
    It’s easy to critique +ABL because hindsight is 20/20, but his lack of clarity was not purposeful nor evil.  +Fellay, on the other hand, I do condemn because he should know better what he’s doing in playing with new-rome’s fire.  Fr Cekada I also blame because his views are born not of a 100% search for truth but contain much division and cause consternation.  
    .
    The views themselves, if you were to split them from the cleric personalities who originated them, all have pros/cons but a consensus among Trads would be reached eventually.  But most people can’t separate the theory from the person, so the debate continues (and mostly it is a waste of time).  Such is human nature than Truth is often obscured by emotion.  And the devil uses this to keep us all in disunity.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #56 on: September 18, 2019, 12:48:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Neither has R&R.  You obviously miss the point that none of these views is meant to SOLVE the problem (because that's an impossibility); these views are only meant to EXPLAIN the problem so that people can take practical actions to save their souls.  

    Exactly, only God can really solve this mess.  It's about how we need to form our consciences about what we are doing.  In normal times, it's an extremely grave thing, putting our souls at risk, to break from communion with the hierarchy.  If I did not have a very reasonable explanation for why I can and should do this, I would find a way to return to full communion with them.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #57 on: September 18, 2019, 12:55:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As much as I loathe Fr Cekada for many things, he makes some valid points on the problems of the sspx’s type of R&R.  But Fr Cekada’s dogmatism is just as problematic.  

    I wish that more people on all sides would have this attitude ... trying to search for the truth and considering one point at a time on its merits, rather than rejecting things out of hand if it doesn't fit into a pre-conceived ideology.  Closing one's mind to possible truth is the surest way to fall into error.  [Note: I do not consider things that go against defined Church teaching in the category of "possible truth".]

    Indeed, Father Cekada has publicly attacked me by name, and yet I have no problem reading what he writes and considering whether it is true or not.  Despite the fact that I do not care for the man, I respect a good argument and will not reject everything he writes out of hand.  He has been known to make some good points.

    Offline ByzCat3000

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1889
    • Reputation: +500/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #58 on: September 18, 2019, 01:11:28 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Matto,
    V2 and the new mass are contrary to Tradition.  Xavier accepts V2 and the new mass (by way of accepting the indult, at the very least).  Therefore he is not a Traditionalist.  
    .
    If one can save their soul in spite of accepting V2 and the new mass, then Traditionalism is schismatic and all Trads will go to hell for their grave disobedience.
    .
    But you can’t have one foot “under new-rome” and one foot with Tradition.  You cannot serve God and mammon.
    You think every single person who accepts V2 and the new mass automatically goes to hell?  Huh 

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Every Pius XII appointed Bishop dead except one - time to move on from SVism?
    « Reply #59 on: September 18, 2019, 01:20:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Neither has R&R.  You obviously miss the point that none of these views is meant to SOLVE the problem (because that's an impossibility); these views are only meant to EXPLAIN the problem so that people can take practical actions to save their souls.  
    .
    As much as I loathe Fr Cekada for many things, he makes some valid points on the problems of the sspx’s type of R&R.  But Fr Cekada’s dogmatism is just as problematic.  
    .
    It’s easy to critique +ABL because hindsight is 20/20, but his lack of clarity was not purposeful nor evil.  +Fellay, on the other hand, I do condemn because he should know better what he’s doing in playing with new-rome’s fire.  Fr Cekada I also blame because his views are born not of a 100% search for truth but contain much division and cause consternation.  
    .
    The views themselves, if you were to split them from the cleric personalities who originated them, all have pros/cons but a consensus among Trads would be reached eventually.  But most people can’t separate the theory from the person, so the debate continues (and mostly it is a waste of time).  Such is human nature than Truth is often obscured by emotion.  And the devil uses this to keep us all in disunity.

    I'm making a point that doesn't necessarily have to do with your point. Not directly anyway. You deride +ABL and the SSPX of old, and yet your views have serious problems too. At least +ABL kept the traditional sacraments alive, with a priesthood ordained in the traditional rite.

    We can't split the views from the cleric personalities who originated them. It would be nice for sedevacantists if that could happen; then it would only be laymen upholding "views" as the Protestants do. But there would hardly be a consensus. The Protestants haven't arrived at one yet.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29