No you are not (furthest Catholic from novus ordo). You share the belief with the Novus Ordo that those in schismatic Churches are Catholic and do not need to convert.
Logical fallacy. First, the novus ordo church is not Catholic, so it does not matter what they think about the Orthodox. You cannot judge the Orthodox based on a non-Catholic sect such as the novus ordo being in approval of them. That's like judging an innocent man because a criminal is in approval of him for whatever reason. Your use of ad hominems by somehow conflating me with the novus ordo fails miserably.
Second, I do know that the Orthodox need to fully accept the Catholic Faith, especially if they want to fully receive the Lord's graces in order for them to grow as close as possible to Him, but despite their defects, they still accept the Faith enough to be part of the Church and saved by Christ. They accept every bit of the Catholic Faith that was solemnly affirmed and defined up to the Great Schism. They are Baptized in Christ through the Catholic Rite. They don't canonically reject the Roman Church's affirmed/defined dogmas since the Schism, but they don't require Orthodox to believe in it, albeit, most Orthodox do reject the post-Schism Dogmas on their own accord, but they're free to believe in them, too.
Example: the Dormition of Holy Theotokos compared to the Assumption. The Orthodox tradition teaches the Mother of God fell asleep, but did not physically die, and she was somehow received into Heaven - mind, body and soul. However, it's not required of them to believe it as a dogma; whereas, the Roman Church dogmatically affirms/defines (after the Schism) that Our Lady was assumed into Heaven (fully awake - not asleep) - mind, body and soul. Moreover, an Orthodox can believe in the Assumption rather than the Dormition if he so chooses, and he would not be reprimanded because it's still along the lines of tradition, but again, most accept the Dormition instead of the Assumption. Again, the Orthodox don't view themselves as having kinetically separated themselves from the Church. Instead, they see Rome as willfully being in schism. Therefore, does not invincible ignorance apply to the Orthodox in this case, especially those many generations that followed the Schism who inherited their defects through no fault of their own? Does your interpretation of the traditional Catholic Church also teach invincible ignorance?
Lastly, Archbishop Lefebvre believed the Orthodox are saved (if they're not guilty of mortal sin). Are you going to
accuse him of thinking like the novus ordo, too? As we all know, he was the
antithesis of novus ordo.
I can think of someone else who is an
Accuser.