Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Dom Landford Defending NOM  (Read 332 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kephapaulos

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1880
  • Reputation: +486/-19
  • Gender: Male
Dom Landford Defending NOM
« on: April 10, 2025, 12:16:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • What do we make of this?

    http://www.trueorfalsepope.com/p/doctrinal-note-on-new-missal-by-dom.html

    Either side of the argument would claim like in that of the Divine Mercy devotion debate that some were taking advantage of Cardinal Ottaviani due to his physcial blindness in his old age. 
    Logged
    "Non nobis, Domine, non nobis; sed nomini tuo da gloriam..." (Ps. 113:9)

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 11946
    • Reputation: +7508/-2250
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Dom Landford Defending NOM
    « Reply #1 on: April 10, 2025, 12:34:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • 1) Why do you care what Dom Landford says?
    2) What is the purpose of a debate on the NOM, in 1970?  The new mass wasn't even "rolled out" fully, in most countries.  The 1970 version isn't what most people got.
    3) Analyzing the new mass in 1970 (which underwent a hurricane of changes since it's 'purest form' early days) is like analyzing a flower before it's bloomed.  The early stages aren't comparable to the finished product.  Less than 1% of new masses were anywhere close to what Ottaviani analyzed (and he had issues with the 1%).  The rest of the 99%, which took longer to implement globally, were so much more modernized than the 1970 version.
    Logged

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46014
    • Reputation: +27097/-5007
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Dom Landford Defending NOM
    « Reply #2 on: April 10, 2025, 12:58:06 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Nobody should care about anything on Salza/Siscoe's site, since they now denounce ALL Traditional Catholics as schismatics, claiming that Bergoglio and Joe Biden are Catholics, while +Lefebvre was not.
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »