Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16]

Author Topic: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies  (Read 20199 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8017
  • Reputation: +2452/-1105
  • Gender: Male
Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #225 on: February 02, 2022, 04:44:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on February 02, 2022, 04:24:18 PM
    Are you (and/or Boca) among the people who were let go for complaining about the school administration?  If you were to disclose that, it may in fact shed some light on this obvious vendetta of yours.

    I believe I already answered this for someone within this very thread.  However, I know none of us necessarily sees/reads each and every post within any given thread.  The above idea completely misses the target.
    Logged
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
    « Reply #226 on: February 02, 2022, 05:16:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: gladius_veritatis on February 02, 2022, 04:44:41 PM
    I believe I already answered this for someone within this very thread.  However, I know none of us necessarily sees/reads each and every post within any given thread.  The above idea completely misses the target.

    If you did, I didn't see it.  And I was just asking a question.  It's obvious that there's a personal animus against Bishop Dolan there ... whatever the cause, and that the subject of his validity isn't being dealt with objectively and outside of that context.
    Logged

    Offline Giacomo

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 17
    • Reputation: +24/-25
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
    « Reply #227 on: February 03, 2022, 08:36:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Ladislaus, you never "disappoint."  I can always count on you to disparage people for trivial reasons.  You tried to do it with Gladius Veritatis (accusing him of being "childish"); and in so doing, you totally embarrassed yourself -- for all the world to see -- that it is you who were childish.  And now (in your reply #241), you are picking on me and "Bocca," criticizing us for the "fonts" that we use.  Well, when it comes to "trivial reasons," that one "takes the cake"!  Congratulations, Ladislaus, you have showcased your childishness once again for all the world to see!
    Logged
    Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16]
    « previous next »