Author Topic: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies (Read 34434 times)

bodeens · « **Reply #170 on:** January 11, 2022, 08:15:55 PM »

Quote from: DigitalLogos on January 11, 2022, 07:09:46 PM

That's Bishop Williamson, you loon.

Impossible to talk to Kelleyites, they will always claim to have a monopoly on the episcopacy.

DigitalLogos · « **Reply #171 on:** January 11, 2022, 08:22:11 PM »

Quote from: bodeens on January 11, 2022, 08:15:55 PM

Impossible to talk to Kelleyites, they will always claim to have a monopoly on the episcopacy.

Ah yes, the Kelleyites, those who will point out the speck in the orders of others but not address the glaring log of being ordained by a Novus Ordo bishop themselves.

Marcellinus · « **Reply #172 on:** January 11, 2022, 08:37:28 PM »

Quote from: bodeens on January 11, 2022, 08:15:55 PM

Impossible to talk to Kelleyites, they will always claim to have a monopoly on the episcopacy.

Oh, he's not a Kelleyite... He's just a wronged man with a vendetta and refuses to let it go.

andy · « **Reply #173 on:** January 11, 2022, 10:04:04 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on January 11, 2022, 11:41:39 AM

So many of the SSPV consider Fr. Dolan not to be a valid priest and therefore not a valid bishop either. I know that the SSPV conditionally confirms people who had been confirmed by Bishop Williamson.

Does not the episcopal consecration brings the fullness of priesthood regardless of validity of ordination?

DigitalLogos · « **Reply #174 on:** January 11, 2022, 10:08:08 PM »

Looks like Bocca got axed.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies (Read 34434 times)

bodeens

Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies

DigitalLogos

Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies

Marcellinus

Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies

andy

Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies

DigitalLogos

Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies