Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies  (Read 34436 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #180 on: January 12, 2022, 09:25:55 AM »
Not I. Bocca Della Verit was one of the few intelligent persons on this board.
Really? What makes you think so? :jester:

Big Mouth was the author of a blog that used to attack all kinds of different clergy, mostly sedevacantist. It's not at all clear that he was a sedevacantist himself, though, as he never espoused any theological position, but would always claim that any clergy that operated outside the structures of Rome were illegitimate. This would include everyone to the right of the Indult groups, I suppose. But mainly his blog was devoted to pointing out misprints and minor errors in newsletters of traditionalist bishops such as Bp. Sanborn and Bp. Dolan, and complaining about various petty faults of different trad priests, and similar childish stories.

He claimed that he had a whole staff of people writing on his blog, and that they belonged to all different persuasions in the trad world, but the style was always the style of one man. After nearly a decade of operation, he started talking about how he was going to start a movement of his own, -- the details were extremely vague -- involving validly ordained traditional bishops from the new church or something like that, I don't even remember. Finally, in 2018 he said he was going to take two weeks off writing the blog to get this new trad congregation (or whatever it was supposed to be) started, and it was going to be the greatest thing ever in the trad world. That was the last post ever posted on that blog, so it's been defunct for three years now.

His religion seemed to be attacking others while never espousing a position of his own. I am glad to see him gone.

Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #181 on: January 12, 2022, 09:30:27 AM »
I was unaware that he had a blog, interesting.


Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #182 on: January 12, 2022, 09:50:00 AM »
Yes, he was banned.

I don't ban all Sedevacantists, but those who are so dogmatic, fringe or extreme that Bp. Williamson is "Mr. Williamson" -- yeah, they're gone. Not welcome here.


I'm not sure he's sedevacantist, actually. I don't think he ever claimed to be. He is one of those people who hates everyone, hence the "Mr." in front of both Bp. Williamson and also sedevacantist bishops.

Offline Emile

  • Supporter
Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #183 on: January 12, 2022, 10:42:33 AM »
Really? What makes you think so? :jester:

Big Mouth was the author of a blog that used to attack all kinds of different clergy, mostly sedevacantist. It's not at all clear that he was a sedevacantist himself, though, as he never espoused any theological position, but would always claim that any clergy that operated outside the structures of Rome were illegitimate. This would include everyone to the right of the Indult groups, I suppose. But mainly his blog was devoted to pointing out misprints and minor errors in newsletters of traditionalist bishops such as Bp. Sanborn and Bp. Dolan, and complaining about various petty faults of different trad priests, and similar childish stories.

He claimed that he had a whole staff of people writing on his blog, and that they belonged to all different persuasions in the trad world, but the style was always the style of one man. After nearly a decade of operation, he started talking about how he was going to start a movement of his own, -- the details were extremely vague -- involving validly ordained traditional bishops from the new church or something like that, I don't even remember. Finally, in 2018 he said he was going to take two weeks off writing the blog to get this new trad congregation (or whatever it was supposed to be) started, and it was going to be the greatest thing ever in the trad world. That was the last post ever posted on that blog, so it's been defunct for three years now.

His religion seemed to be attacking others while never espousing a position of his own. I am glad to see him gone.
Great post, Yeti!

He was/is trying to black pill the entire trad movement, certainly not just sedes. I've never made a firm judgement as to his motivation: is he willing to destroy everything in order to exact revenge on +Dolan or is +Dolan just an excuse to cover a more sinister plot or is he just nuts? At the end of the day I think "Jorge" is the most fitting name for him.

Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #184 on: January 12, 2022, 11:30:23 AM »
I bet he is a home aloner.  Home aloners don't typically identify as sedevacantist.