Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies  (Read 34458 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline DecemRationis

  • Supporter
Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #105 on: December 12, 2021, 09:05:11 AM »
Here they are.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #106 on: December 12, 2021, 09:50:50 AM »
Here they are.

Awesome stuff.  Thank you very much.  


Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #107 on: December 12, 2021, 10:52:23 AM »
Here they are.
Interesting.  Where are there links to the actual source, so we know he really did say this?

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #108 on: December 12, 2021, 11:47:50 AM »
Interesting.  Where are there links to the actual source, so we know he really did say this?

The source is given as Sodalitium, a periodical that was (and maybe still is) published by Fr. Ricossa's group in Italy.  Can past or present issues be found online?  Dunno.

Re: Dolan v. Sanborn - Bp. Sanborn replies
« Reply #109 on: December 12, 2021, 04:38:05 PM »
Has anyone noticed that Bp. Dolan has been doing some "damage control" the past few weeks since Bp. Sanborn's video attacking him? All of a sudden, Bp. Dolan's Sunday sermons (which anyone can listen to at the SGG site) have become quite syrupy and schmaltzy, almost like a conservative Novus Ordo "homily". 

All of a sudden he went from giving his usually very strong Sunday sermons (that always touched on very significant Traditional Catholic topics concerning the faith and the outside world) to subjects such as "Confidence," "Kindness," and "Cheerfulness" (and even drawing these subjects out to several weeks at a time). :facepalm:

Has anyone else noticed this? In my opinion, the sermons have taken too sudden of change in significant topics and quality for it to be merely "coincidental." I think it has to be some sort of "damage control"